0
ryoder

"How World War II scientists invented a data-driven approach to fighting fascism"

Recommended Posts

Interesting article about WWII era study of what makes people support an authoritarian leader. Some excerpts:


It turned out that people with authoritarian tendencies were more accurately described as ethnocentric. Authoritarians believed their own group was superior and expressed racism against a wide range of other people.
...
Another discovery was that authoritarians tended to distrust science and strongly disliked the idea of using imagination to solve problems. They preferred to stick to tried-and-true traditional methods of organizing society. Many believed that force was the best way to deal with conflict, partly because war is an inevitable outgrowth of human nature.
...
Another personality trait that emerged had to do with sexuality. Authoritarians were rigidly opposed to homosexuality, occasionally suggesting that homosexuals should be killed or at least jailed. But more generally, they were fascinated by regulating other people's sex lives, often speculating about the "wild sex life" of groups they hated, whether those were artists, "weak" politicians, or racial minorities.
...
Overall, the Berkeley group described authoritarians' outlook as "cynical" because of a tendency to believe the powerful would always rule the weak, and it was best to be on the side of the powerful, which is also likely why authoritarians expressed a desire for politicians who would take charge, set rules, and crush dissent.



Article: http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/06/how-world-war-ii-scientists-invented-a-data-driven-approach-to-fighting-fascism/
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it's good, because Berkeley is a bastion of even and unbiased thought

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rehmwa

it's good, because Berkeley is a bastion of even and unbiased thought



An ad hominem attack is the best you got?
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ryoder

***it's good, because Berkeley is a bastion of even and unbiased thought



An ad hominem attack is the best you got?

(pretty much....I didn't even open the link)

Geez, compliment a nationally known educational facility and it's considered an attack?


(although, to be honest, it doesn't matter which university, it seems that articles from any university that try to describe demographics just tend to just be a lazy descent/wallow into a realm of childish stereotypes published under pretension. merely a regurgitation of nonsense from the mainstream and grossly left wing or right wing to the extent that it's worthless drivel except as an example of what writing should never be)

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rehmwa



(although, to be honest, it doesn't matter which university, it seems that articles from any university that try to describe demographics just tend to just be a lazy descent/wallow into a realm of childish stereotypes published under pretension. merely a regurgitation of nonsense from the mainstream and grossly left wing or right wing to the extent that it's worthless drivel except as an example of what writing should never be)



So you discount any kind of research?
How do you propose we advance knowledge?
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ryoder

***

(although, to be honest, it doesn't matter which university, it seems that articles from any university that try to describe demographics just tend to just be a lazy descent/wallow into a realm of childish stereotypes published under pretension. merely a regurgitation of nonsense from the mainstream and grossly left wing or right wing to the extent that it's worthless drivel except as an example of what writing should never be)



So you discount any kind of research?
How do you propose we advance knowledge?

duh - emotionally driven rhetoric.

for the children

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***it's good, because Berkeley is a bastion of even and unbiased thought



Yep, the same place that produced the leaders of the Manhattan Project.

which has killed more people than Chipotle

(I believe Chipotle was an old west posse leader.....)

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***it's good, because Berkeley is a bastion of even and unbiased thought



Yep, the same place that produced the leaders of the Manhattan Project.

The ones who let us pay for the project, and then gave the results to the Soviets for free?

Mighty white of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
winsor

******it's good, because Berkeley is a bastion of even and unbiased thought



Yep, the same place that produced the leaders of the Manhattan Project.

The ones who let us pay for the project, and then gave the results to the Soviets for free?

Mighty white of them.

How many of the spies were from Berkeley?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

*********it's good, because Berkeley is a bastion of even and unbiased thought



Yep, the same place that produced the leaders of the Manhattan Project.

The ones who let us pay for the project, and then gave the results to the Soviets for free?

Mighty white of them.

How many of the spies were from Berkeley?

Didn't the Soviets require credit from Berkeley to spy for them? Maybe one or two got a pass on that requirement.

The CIA is, of course, a Yale shop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0