0
Iago

Knife attack in China- 29 dead

Recommended Posts

SkyDekker

Quote

Maybe it's because there are just far less of you than us?



Maybe, but when you look at a ratio per 100, you find out that isn't the case.



What might be interesting to look at (and I very briefly googled but came up short) would be a comparison of population vs. population density for different countries. (i.e. percentage of people in the country that live in an area with population density of 500-999 ppl/sq km, 1000-1499 ppl/sq km, etc.) Obviously it's going to be positively correlated, but it would give you an idea as to the degree of "clumping" that was going on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend


Well, taking back DC in 1814 was clearly a mistake. Should have let them keep it.



the whole reason we gained independence from the fogbreathers back in the 1700s is because they only meant to lose New Jersey and got carried away
cavete terrae.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker

Quote

Maybe it's because there are just far less of you than us?



Maybe, but when you look at a ratio per 100, you find out that isn't the case.



You expect him to be able to perform DIVISION? Get real.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
champu

***

Quote

Maybe it's because there are just far less of you than us?



Maybe, but when you look at a ratio per 100, you find out that isn't the case.



What might be interesting to look at (and I very briefly googled but came up short) would be a comparison of population vs. population density for different countries. (i.e. percentage of people in the country that live in an area with population density of 500-999 ppl/sq km, 1000-1499 ppl/sq km, etc.) Obviously it's going to be positively correlated, but it would give you an idea as to the degree of "clumping" that was going on.

You could. Look at Toronto and compare with New York, LA, Chicago, Detroit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can't just look at a handful of big cities to get a picture of overall density across the country. I'm talking about a bar chart where you, say, normalize the population of the countries to 100,000,000 or whatever, make each bar a bin of population density, and the y-axis log10 of the number of normalized people living in an area with that density.

That would give you a very good picture of how spread out people were in a given country and how clumped up people get when they do clump up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
champu

You can't just look at a handful of big cities to get a picture of overall density across the country. I'm talking about a bar chart where you, say, normalize the population of the countries to 100,000,000 or whatever, make each bar a bin of population density, and the y-axis log10 of the number of normalized people living in an area with that density.

That would give you a very good picture of how spread out people were in a given country and how clumped up people get when they do clump up.



A measure we use in crystallography to determine "clumpiness" of crystal orientations is the (normalized) standard deviation from uniformity.

(I take credit for introducing this in 1970)
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***You can't just look at a handful of big cities to get a picture of overall density across the country. I'm talking about a bar chart where you, say, normalize the population of the countries to 100,000,000 or whatever, make each bar a bin of population density, and the y-axis log10 of the number of normalized people living in an area with that density.

That would give you a very good picture of how spread out people were in a given country and how clumped up people get when they do clump up.



A measure we use in crystallography to determine "clumpiness" of crystal orientations is the (normalized) standard deviation from uniformity.

(I take credit for introducing this in 1970)

Similar idea. With population density in a country I would be interested to see all the bins though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
champu

******You can't just look at a handful of big cities to get a picture of overall density across the country. I'm talking about a bar chart where you, say, normalize the population of the countries to 100,000,000 or whatever, make each bar a bin of population density, and the y-axis log10 of the number of normalized people living in an area with that density.

That would give you a very good picture of how spread out people were in a given country and how clumped up people get when they do clump up.



A measure we use in crystallography to determine "clumpiness" of crystal orientations is the (normalized) standard deviation from uniformity.

(I take credit for introducing this in 1970)

Similar idea. With population density in a country I would be interested to see all the bins though.

How does the low population density in the Northwest Territories affect the crime rate in densly populated Toronto?

Specially when comparing it to other extremely large cities. Toronto is the 5th largest metropolitan area in North America. Crime rate comparisons with other large cities would be valid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker

How does the low population density in the Northwest Territories affect the crime rate in densly populated Toronto?



Why are you stuck on comparing a handful of cities?

SkyDekker

Specially when comparing it to other extremely large cities. Toronto is the 5th largest metropolitan area in North America. Crime rate comparisons with other large cities would be valid.



And Redondo Beach has a similar population density to Toronto, but comparing crime statistics between those two cities doesn't get you any closer to understanding differences in homicide rates or firearm homicide rates between the United States and Canada.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***You can't just look at a handful of big cities to get a picture of overall density across the country. I'm talking about a bar chart where you, say, normalize the population of the countries to 100,000,000 or whatever, make each bar a bin of population density, and the y-axis log10 of the number of normalized people living in an area with that density.

That would give you a very good picture of how spread out people were in a given country and how clumped up people get when they do clump up.



A measure we use in crystallography to determine "clumpiness" of crystal orientations is the (normalized) standard deviation from uniformity.

(I take credit for introducing this in 1970)




Thats hot;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Why are you stuck on comparing a handful of cities?



I am not. Just asking a question.

Quote

And Redondo Beach has a similar population density to Toronto,



That's why I suggested comparing cities of similar size (and population desnity, though Toronto is significantly more densly populated than LA for instance)

But, guess you would prefer to cherry pick to make things work for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Iago

***

Quote

Why are you stuck on comparing a handful of cities?



I am not. Just asking a question.

***And Redondo Beach has a similar population density to Toronto,



That's why I suggested comparing cities of similar size (and population desnity, though Toronto is significantly more densly populated than LA for instance)

But, guess you would prefer to cherry pick to make things work for you.

The US and Canada also report different types and levels of crimes in the various categories. It's like comparing a white seedless grape to a dark blue squeeze grape.

You are right, we tend to classify murder as shoplifting.

So basically we don't know if the US is more violent than Canada. We also don't know if more people (per 100) get shot and killed in which country.

But, we do know that guns have nothing to do with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker

******

Quote

Why are you stuck on comparing a handful of cities?



I am not. Just asking a question.

***And Redondo Beach has a similar population density to Toronto,



That's why I suggested comparing cities of similar size (and population desnity, though Toronto is significantly more densly populated than LA for instance)

But, guess you would prefer to cherry pick to make things work for you.

The US and Canada also report different types and levels of crimes in the various categories. It's like comparing a white seedless grape to a dark blue squeeze grape.

You are right, we tend to classify murder as shoplifting.



" true, from a certain point of view"; Obi-wan Kenobi

"Very similar in most respects"; C3PO
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker

But, guess you would prefer to cherry pick to make things work for you.



...he said... ...in response to the first 25% of a sentence that went on to explain that comparisons of only a couple cities would not accurately give you a good comparison of two countries...

...sigh...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
champu

***But, guess you would prefer to cherry pick to make things work for you.



...he said... ...in response to the first 25% of a sentence that went on to explain that comparisons of only a couple cities would not accurately give you a good comparison of two countries...

...sigh...

After the issue was raised regarding population density. At which point I suggested we compare densly populated cities in the countries in question.

With firearm homicide rates lower in densely populated Canadian cities than in densely populated American cities, that doesn't appear to give you the answer you are looking for.

In response to that you brought up that Redondo Beach is just as densely populated as Toronto, therefor looking at population density alone would not work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker

With firearm homicide rates lower in densely populated Canadian cities than in densely populated American cities, that doesn't appear to give you the answer you are looking for.



Would you please stop arguing against what you imagine is an answer I am looking for?

There are too many confounding problems with comparing cities head to head. I said it "might be interesting" to compare countries head to head while having a way to account for the fact that they have different overall populations, areas, number of cities, densities of cities, etc. while still aggregating over the whole country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0