Army Officer Wants You Disarmed: “We Will Pry Your Gun from Your Cold, Dead Fingers”

[RonD1120 58]

jclalor

Has there ever been a negative Obama story that you've been unable to believe because it was just too crazy?

The problem for me is that I am unable to recall a positive Hussein Obama story. He represents the leader of the subversive enemy. Therefore, anything is possible.

Who is the subversive enemy?

Ephesians 6:
The Whole Armor of God

10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. 11 Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. 13 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[rickjump1 0]

AndyBoyd

******http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTO-xVLG5HE

Your proposal is acceptable.

Batemen probably goes through a case of Mountain Dew everyday.

Come again? The character in "Men in Black" that was the sugar freak could be LTC Bateman/Batman or one of Barack's lapdogs that would disarm us for a dog biscuit and a pat on the back. Bet they drink a case of Mountain Dew a day. A cigarette and a Mountain Dew is the "breakfast of champions" in some parts of the country.

Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

[Andy9o8 0]

You don't even try any more. People giggle.

[rickjump1 0]

jakee

******

Quote

and the president can't modify that site to his liking? Puhlease.

You're an idiot.

I like that jakee. Do you run around with a tin cup in your hand?

I don't know what that means. Are you asking if I'm Kevin Costner?

Do you think the President edits Snopes?

Do you think the President is trying to disarm you by military force?

Do you believe that the President is ridding the military of officers who won't shoot US civilians?

Answer yes to any of the above questions (including the Costner thing) and you're probably an idiot too.

When you think of someone with a tin cup in their hand, you think of someone blind or someone giving Jocko the monkey the day off. I'll pass on Jocko. I think you're blind.

Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

[Darius11 12]

I find it hilarious that when Obama was elected there was a huge fear in the gun owners community so they went out and purchased a lot of stuff ammo guns, To the point that even during the economy claps the gun stores were doing great better then ever.

Does it ever occur to anyone that the people who love shit like “they are going to take your guns away” are the gun manufacturers and retailers?

Do you ever wonder why this stuff is on crazy ass right wing websites?

I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain

[Andy9o8 0]

Quote

Do you ever wonder why this stuff is on crazy ass right wing websites?

No.

[rushmc 18]

Andy9o8

You don't even try any more. People Bigots giggle.

FIFY

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[funjumper101 15]

rushmc

***You don't even try any more. People Bigots giggle.

FIFY

Nice try. The actual correction that needed to be made is

Intelligent people giggle at the the moronic bullshit that the RWCs believe.

Hey Ron, how is that practicing Socialism going? You claim to be against Socialism in all of its forms, yet you collect benefits from Social Security and Medicare. That makes you a living example of the absolute hypocrisy of the Reich Wing Conservative philosophy.

[rushmc 18]

funjumper101

******You don't even try any more. People Bigots giggle.

FIFY

Nice try. The actual correction that needed to be made is

Intelligent people giggle at the the moronic bullshit that the RWCs believe.

Hey Ron, how is that practicing Socialism going? You claim to be against Socialism in all of its forms, yet you collect benefits from Social Security and Medicare. That makes you a living example of the absolute hypocrisy of the Reich Wing Conservative philosophy.

Tolerance on display!

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,257]

Quote

I think you're blind.

That's because you're too deluded to notice that whenever you post one of these ridiculous, moronic stories about Barack The Baby Eater I give you reasons that they're not true, reasons that take 2 minutes to find on Google, and you invariably come back with nothing.

Disagree with the man's politics all you want, but this isn't politics. You're so blinded by bullshit that you believe anything you read that supports your view, and each bit of bullshit you believe deepens your hatred and makes you ready to believe the next bit of bullshit and the next, and the next, until you're reposting april fools jokes as if they were gospel truth.

BTW, I notice that you didn't respond to any of my questions. Maybe it's because even you recognise the stupidity of your assertions when they're spelled out like that. But I won't hold my breath on that.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rickjump1 0]

Darius11

I find it hilarious that when Obama was elected there was a huge fear in the gun owners community so they went out and purchased a lot of stuff ammo guns, To the point that even during the economy claps the gun stores were doing great better then ever.

Does it ever occur to anyone that the people who love shit like “they are going to take your guns away” are the gun manufacturers and retailers?

Do you ever wonder why this stuff is on crazy ass right wing websites?

Gun manufactures and retailers are actually in business. Of course they love people who live in fear of their president and government. This is a no brainer, and all they had to do is listen to some of Barack's early speeches when he said the country needs a "civilian defense force" comparable to the US Military in numbers and finance.

Even the Canadians picked up on this:http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/47844Quote:"Four years ago this month—on July 2nd, 2008—Obama delivered a speech in Boulder, Colorado in which he promised the creation and establishment of a “Civilian National Security Force.” He further promised it would be “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the US Military.”



It is well known amongst dictators, the world over, that a private army is necessary to control the great unwashed masses over which they force their rule."

You want to hear him say it? Google it.

Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

[Darius11 12]

I was only commenting on the motivation behind continuing the "they will take your guns fear."


As to the other stuff you mentioned, i have heard all sort of things, from Russian solders on US soil brought just to kill Americans, because they thought US solders would not fire on fellow citizens, TO FEMA death camps, NWO etc etc

I don't know who to believe.

I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain

[jakee 1,257]

Quote

"Four years ago this month—on July 2nd, 2008—Obama delivered a speech in Boulder, Colorado in which he promised the creation and establishment of a “Civilian National Security Force.” He further promised it would be “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the US Military.”

And he further said what he meant by it, and what he meant was about as far from an armed force or authority as it's possible to get.

Google it and find out.

Quote

It is well known amongst dictators, the world over, that a private army is necessary to control the great unwashed masses over which they force their rule.

Even if he meant what you think he meant it wouldn't be a private army, it would be another federal army. And he's already got one of those - it's called the Army.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rickjump1 0]

jakee

Quote

"Four years ago this month—on July 2nd, 2008—Obama delivered a speech in Boulder, Colorado in which he promised the creation and establishment of a “Civilian National Security Force.” He further promised it would be “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the US Military.”

And he further said what he meant by it, and what he meant was about as far from an armed force or authority as it's possible to get.

Google it and find out.

Quote

It is well known amongst dictators, the world over, that a private army is necessary to control the great unwashed masses over which they force their rule.

Even if he meant what you think he meant it wouldn't be a private army, it would be another federal army. And he's already got one of those - it's called the Army.

In his own words: http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=obama+talks+about+private+army&type=2button&fr=uh3_my_web_gs You need to be working for Snopes covering for their guy in the White House.

Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

[jakee 1,257]

Quote

In his own words: http://search.yahoo.com/...amp;fr=uh3_my_web_gs

There's nothing there and you know it. If you actually had Obama saying what you claim he's saying you'd have linked to it directly. But you don't, you've linked to a search page instead so you can claim that the words are in there somewhere.

You should know how transparent you are.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 18]

jakee

Quote

In his own words: http://search.yahoo.com/...amp;fr=uh3_my_web_gs

There's nothing there and you know it. If you actually had Obama saying what you claim he's saying you'd have linked to it directly. But you don't, you've linked to a search page instead so you can claim that the words are in there somewhere.

You should know how transparent you are.

Hold on here

are you saying Obama did not say the quote about the civilian force?
Or are you saying Obama meant some different that what he said ?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rickjump1 0]

jakee

Quote

In his own words: http://search.yahoo.com/...amp;fr=uh3_my_web_gs

There's nothing there and you know it. If you actually had Obama saying what you claim he's saying you'd have linked to it directly. But you don't, you've linked to a search page instead so you can claim that the words are in there somewhere.

You should know how transparent you are.

Transparency? Be patient your transparent hero is a little slow coming on, but he will:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fO-usAlqak How come some of his remarks are different from transcripts of his speeches: http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/3683/obama%e2%80%99s-civilian-national-security-force/ Quote:That little bit from Barack Obama’s speech on national service is not in the transcript of his prepared remarks. So just what does Senator Obama mean by this:


We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Just prior to those two lines, Obama was talking about something quite different. He goes from talking about increasing the size of the US Foreign Service and opening consulates that have been shuttered (without telling us how he is going to pay for it) and doubling the size of the Peace Corps to the mother of all non-sequitors:


We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

What exactly does Senator Obama mean by a “civilian national security force“?

Is he referencing the ATF, FBI, or DEA? Or something new and different say like the Defense of the Revolution Brigades that they have in Cuba and Venezuela where neighbors spy on neighbors? Surely he can’t mean the US Foreign Service and the Peace Corps et al be funded in the billions of dollars. Whatever he is referencing it sounds like a dramatic departure from current practice and current funding. And why did it take the press so long to catch the discrepancy between the speech as delivered and the prepared remarks? Why are the references in the transcript to this deleted or omitted? Should we be worried? He was rather emphatic about it so I doubt that he just got carried away and ad libbed it.

Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

[jakee 1,257]

rushmc

***

Quote

In his own words: http://search.yahoo.com/...amp;fr=uh3_my_web_gs

There's nothing there and you know it. If you actually had Obama saying what you claim he's saying you'd have linked to it directly. But you don't, you've linked to a search page instead so you can claim that the words are in there somewhere.

You should know how transparent you are.

Hold on here

are you saying Obama did not say the quote about the civilian force?
Or are you saying Obama meant some different that what he said ?

Nope.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[jakee 1,257]

Quote

Just prior to those two lines, Obama was talking about something quite different.

Just prior to it, and also just after it. So could it be that this one phrase you've fixated on exists in the context of the other stuff he was saying at the same time, or is it that he just decided to announce his intention to create his own private army in two ssentences unconnected to any of the rest of his speech? Why don't you think real hard about that one.

And once you've thought about it and reached the wrong conclusion yet again, try thinking about this one: why would a Presidential candidate, on the campaign trail, decide to announce that he wants a private army? Moreover, a candidate that you on the right have atacked for being unable to function without a teleprompter and a speech scripted to within an inch of its life? Why would that have been written into a speech?

And once you've dismissed that objection as well, why not move onto this one: in the last 5 years, has the President created a private army?

Quote

Surely he can’t mean the US Foreign Service and the Peace Corps

And yet...

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 18]

jakee

******

Quote

In his own words: http://search.yahoo.com/...amp;fr=uh3_my_web_gs

There's nothing there and you know it. If you actually had Obama saying what you claim he's saying you'd have linked to it directly. But you don't, you've linked to a search page instead so you can claim that the words are in there somewhere.

You should know how transparent you are.

Hold on here

are you saying Obama did not say the quote about the civilian force?
Or are you saying Obama meant some different that what he said ?

Nope.

Ok
So you are not saying anything

Glad things are normal

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[champu 1]

rickjump1

We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

What exactly does Senator Obama mean by a “civilian national security force“?

I was unaware that people were making such a big deal out of this particular quote.

From the context of his speech it's pretty clear he's discussing international actions in the interests of national security. When he says the shift of this needs to be away from the military and to a civilian "force" that can mean a) Department of State b) CIA c) The Peace Corps, the three civilian "forces" that conduct international actions in the interests of national security.

This interpretation is, in my humble opinion, corroborated by his actions since he was elected.

[rickjump1 0]

jakee

Quote

Just prior to those two lines, Obama was talking about something quite different.

Just prior to it, and also just after it. So could it be that this one phrase you've fixated on exists in the context of the other stuff he was saying at the same time, or is it that he just decided to announce his intention to create his own private army in two ssentences unconnected to any of the rest of his speech? Why don't you think real hard about that one.

And once you've thought about it and reached the wrong conclusion yet again, try thinking about this one: why would a Presidential candidate, on the campaign trail, decide to announce that he wants a private army? Moreover, a candidate that you on the right have atacked for being unable to function without a teleprompter and a speech scripted to within an inch of its life? Why would that have been written into a speech?

And once you've dismissed that objection as well, why not move onto this one: in the last 5 years, has the President created a private army?

Quote

Surely he can’t mean the US Foreign Service and the Peace Corps

And yet...

This went over the heads of most mainstream media because, like snopes, their heads were in the clouds for Barack. He said this little paragraph to back up campaign promises? He certainly started buying up large quantities of Ammunition and he woke a lot of people interested in keeping our freedoms that were fought and died for (you Brits probably remember that part). http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/02/17/Feds-Buy-2-Billion-Rounds-Of-Ammunition jakee you're in complete denial about anything that makes Barack look bad. It really shows.

I think the civilian national force is the DHS. Did you remember this administration's talk about mandatory 3 yr. universal service or did that go over your head too?

Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

[jakee 1,257]

Quote

He said this little paragraph to back up campaign promises?

Eh? 1) He said it on the campaign trail; 2) What promise? To create a private army? Why would he want to promise that?

Quote

He certainly started buying up large quantities of Ammunition and he woke a lot of people interested in keeping our freedoms that were fought and died for (you Brits probably remember that part). http://www.breitbart.com/...Rounds-Of-Ammunition

Boom, yet another twist to avoid actually having to think about any objection to your crazy theory. As soon as any assertion is challenged just abandon it and move on to the next one.

So, which of the two proposed explanations in that link do you think is correct: Is it because DHS is preparing for the complete economic and social collapse of the USA; or is it because GWB massively increased the number of federal law enforcement personnel?

Quote

I think the civilian national force is the DHS.

Really? Why don't you think it was the people he was talking about in the speech?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[jakee 1,257]

rushmc

So you are not saying anything

Oh dear, the cold, sharp teeth of the steel trap of logic you set have snapped shut around me!

Or maybe you just need to look up 'false dichotomy'.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 18]

jakee

Or maybe you just need to look up 'false dichotomy'.

Nah
I do not really want to see your picture

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln