CanuckInUSA 0 #1 July 24, 2013 Is this the work of the eco-terrorists? Where hiking and biking trails are now being sabotaged, where humans and their best friends (dogs) lives are being put at risk? Read more here. How far are these nut bars willing to go? Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorrinRadd 0 #2 July 24, 2013 CanuckInUSAIs this the work of the eco-terrorists? Where hiking and biking trails are now being sabotaged, where humans and their best friends (dogs) lives are being put at risk? Read more here. How far are these nut bars willing to go? Eco terrorists? Naw. There are some pathological dog haters out there and their hatred has nothing to do with eco-terrorism. We get similar stuff in parks in the city.. people leaving poisoned food for dogs to eat, or pieces of meat with nails in them.... just a bunch of psycho freaks. There's a guy in my building who gets totally bent out of shape any time he sees a dog. He keeps complaining to our property manager about how we need to outlaw dogs. He is rude and mean to dog owners. He could not care less about environmentalism... he just hates dogs.Why drive myself crazy trying to be normal, when I am already at crazy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #3 July 24, 2013 Sure, jump straight to "Eco-terrorist." That seems reasonable. Psychos, pot growers and meth cookers? Naw. Can't be them. Must be "Eco-terrorist."quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darius11 12 #4 July 24, 2013 quadeSure, jump straight to "Eco-terrorist." That seems reasonable. Psychos, pot growers and meth cookers? Naw. Can't be them. Must be "Eco-terrorist." I think using traps in one place would get more attention then the drug dealers would want. But who knowsI'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorrinRadd 0 #5 July 24, 2013 Darius11***Sure, jump straight to "Eco-terrorist." That seems reasonable. Psychos, pot growers and meth cookers? Naw. Can't be them. Must be "Eco-terrorist." I think using traps in one place would get more attention then the drug dealers would want. But who knows Indeed. And most of the pot growers and meth cookers do their work in the city, not up on mountain trails.Why drive myself crazy trying to be normal, when I am already at crazy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #6 July 24, 2013 Maybe it's different up in the Great White North. Down here, sometimes you want to be careful which forest you walk into.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorrinRadd 0 #7 July 24, 2013 quadeMaybe it's different up in the Great White North. Down here, sometimes you want to be careful which forest you walk into. Grouse Mountain is not a forest in the strictest sense. I mean, yes, it is a forest. But it is really more of a glorified park. You can get to it by city transit. Edit: http://www.grousemountain.com/Why drive myself crazy trying to be normal, when I am already at crazy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #8 July 24, 2013 quade Sure, jump straight to "Eco-terrorist." That seems reasonable. Psychos, pot growers and meth cookers? Naw. Can't be them. Must be "Eco-terrorist." You failed to acknowledge and recognize the "?" mark in the title of the thread as well as the content of the words in the thread. It was a question, is this eco-terrorism? It wasn't a statement. Some will think it is eco-terrorism and some won't. But your first reaction was to attack the poster. Why? Do you really have that much hatred in your head? or are you just intolerant towards those who have different opinions than your own. I don't agree with everything BillVon says, but Bill is a fair man. He rarely attacks people on this form. The same can not be said for you. How you got this job of being a moderator is a mystery. But don't worry, keep showing the rest of us how much hate you have in that mind of yours towards anyone who does not see the world through the same colored glasses you use. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorrinRadd 0 #9 July 24, 2013 Sorry CanuckInUSA... just weighing in with my 2 cents, but I don't see the personal attack. It is a strange question to ask.. why would you feel this might be the work of eco-terrorists? Why even bring it up? It is a bad thing to do, certainly... laying wire traps for random people and animals to get caught. But you were the person to mention eco-terrorism. It didn't mention that at all in the article.Why drive myself crazy trying to be normal, when I am already at crazy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #10 July 24, 2013 If you read the comments from the article you will see that some people (not all) think this might be a case of eco-terrorism, hence my question. I repeat from the original post I never made the statement that this was eco-terrorism. It was only a question. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #11 July 24, 2013 CanuckInUSAIf you read the comments from the article you will see that some people (not all) think this might be a case of eco-terrorism, hence my question. I repeat from the original post I never made the statement that this was eco-terrorism. It was only a question. Line of progression: 1) Comment made by conservative-ish poster 2) Narrow view only sees "eco" and then terrorism linked together 3) Immediate "Defense" response. 4) Personal attack against OP 5) Defense of actions regardless of logic. 6) More personal attacks 7) Spelling and grammar attacks 8) Attitude of "What does it matter anyway" 9) Entire thread is derailed and the original subject matter avoided and ignored. 10) The left leaning posters PM each other and pat themselves on the back for a job well done.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #12 July 24, 2013 quadeSure, jump straight to "Eco-terrorist." That seems reasonable. Psychos, pot growers and meth cookers? Naw. Can't be them. Must be "Eco-terrorist." No different than you saying the Republicans are waging a war on women Same bs Different bs channel"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorrinRadd 0 #13 July 24, 2013 rushmc***Sure, jump straight to "Eco-terrorist." That seems reasonable. Psychos, pot growers and meth cookers? Naw. Can't be them. Must be "Eco-terrorist." No different than you saying the Republicans are waging a war on women Same bs Different bs channel and just like that.. BLAM! Thread derailed to partisan bickering, yet again.Why drive myself crazy trying to be normal, when I am already at crazy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #14 July 24, 2013 Quote 10) The left leaning posters PM each other and pat themselves on the back for a job well done. Obama has taught them well"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #15 July 24, 2013 NorrinRadd******Sure, jump straight to "Eco-terrorist." That seems reasonable. Psychos, pot growers and meth cookers? Naw. Can't be them. Must be "Eco-terrorist." No different than you saying the Republicans are waging a war on women Same bs Different bs channel and just like that.. BLAM! Thread derailed to partisan bickering, yet again. The OP was that way Did you read your own subjecy line? sheesh"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorrinRadd 0 #16 July 24, 2013 rushmcQuote 10) The left leaning posters PM each other and pat themselves on the back for a job well done. Obama has taught them well Just wondering if it is in fact possible to have a discussion in SC that doesn't have the words "republican", "democrat", or anything related thereof.Why drive myself crazy trying to be normal, when I am already at crazy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aphid 0 #17 July 24, 2013 QuoteJust wondering if it is in fact possible to have a discussion in SC that doesn't have the words "republican", "democrat", or anything related thereof. Now that's some funny shit, right there. (For the record, I am sympathetic to your statement) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #18 July 24, 2013 NorrinRadd***Quote 10) The left leaning posters PM each other and pat themselves on the back for a job well done. Obama has taught them well Just wondering if it is in fact possible to have a discussion in SC that doesn't have the words "republican", "democrat", or anything related thereof. Sure, instead you can use RWC's, Conservatives, Liberals, Progressives, Wackos, Libtards, Repubicans etc. Did I miss any? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
