NOW (better known as the NAGS)

[rushmc 18]

is a fucking joke
and they prove it yet again

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/now-refuses-comment-on-gawkers-christine-odonnell-sex-smear-106140473.html

Quote

NOW refuses comment on Gawker’s Christine O’Donnell sex smear

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/now-refuses-comment-on-gawkers-christine-odonnell-sex-smear-106140473.html#ixzz13hLBca4R

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[happythoughts 0]

They have been a politically expedient organization for decades.

Examples -
Anita Hills makes politically timed sexual harassment
charges against a conservative SC nominee and gets all
kinds of open support.

Five other women charge a President with sexual harassment
and unwanted physical contact, but you could hear
the crickets chirping over at the NOW offices.

They have no problem sacrificing women for the political
purposes. They have done it for decades.

[skipbelt 0]

sad but true . Juanita Broderick raped once by clinnochio , again by now. " here put this ice on your bleeding lip". this from the organization claiming to support women and women's rights. the same organization that declares women don't lie about rape . luckily she didn't get pregnant . now would have been torn asunder trying to decide where they stood on that abortion !

[juanesky 0]

Quote

They have been a politically expedient organization for decades.

Examples -
Anita Hills makes politically timed sexual harassment
charges against a conservative SC nominee and gets all
kinds of open support.

Five other women charge a President with sexual harassment
and unwanted physical contact, but you could hear
the crickets chirping over at the NOW offices.

They have no problem sacrificing women for the political
purposes. They have done it for decades.

But don't you know it was really all about the BJ, and how conservatives don't like that?

"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

[skipbelt 0]

oral sex isn't sex , maybe rape isn't either !

[happythoughts 0]

Quote

But don't you know it was really all about the BJ, and how conservatives don't like that?

People try to divert a discussion that way if they want to avoid the real topic, choice. I support a womens right to choose their sexual partners.The NOW doesn't care about women having a choice if it favors their agenda (the 'greater good' argument, I am sure).

[juanesky 0]

And that is exactly of how I feel about slick's action. In the end, he harrassed not only Paula Jones, but also Lewinsky, by policy definition, by using his position and influence, but, wait...I'm sorry, according to our very Billvon, this is integrity.

"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

[turtlespeed 212]

Quote

I'm sorry, according to our very Billvon, this is integrity.

Exspecially if you can lie about it to almost 300 million people that count on you to be honest.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[rushmc 18]

Quote

Quote

I'm sorry, according to our very Billvon, this is integrity.

Exspecially if you can lie about it to almost 300 million people that count on you to be honest.

Getting back on topic I see NOW is defending O Donnell.
Good for them

It is a start anyway

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[skipbelt 0]

yeah , luckily O'donnel wasn't raped by clinnichio . if O'donnel got the Juanita Broderick treatment , now would throw her under the bus after throwing her down the stairs !