0
philh

religion and morality

Recommended Posts

I have heard many time from religious people that religion is required for morality. The question is often posed to me as a non beliver, why dont I go out and kill if I do not believe in god? My answer is simple, that we have evolved brains that can work out that constant violence is not in our mutual interest. Morality evolves, it has been and will continue to do so.
But on a dull day at work with nothing to do I decdied to put something to the test. If as theists claim adandoning god leads to ruin then there should be some direct evidence of this. I decided to corrleate non beliefe with the murder rate in the worlds 15 weaalthiest nations. In order to try and compare like with like I chose the top 15 wealtheist nations in the world, I ignored small banking islands by excluding any nation with less than 1 mio people and ignored countries who were not democracies. This I believe enables us to compare similar socio economic conditions. If the theists are right there should be a high correlation between unbelievers and the murder rate. I used data from Wipedia and average data from
http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html

what did I get? a negative correlation of -.317. I then thought maybe I can make my results more accurate. After all there is easyly accesible data on gdp per head rates. Its not unreasonbale to assume the richer one is the less likely one is to commit a murder. So I adjusted the crime rates to be wieghted by the differential gdp rates. That way I believe my comparsion is even more "like with like". What did I get then? -.37.
So next time a theist says religion is needed for moralty ask them why I didnt get a high positive correlation, indeed why did I get a negative corrleation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I have heard many time from religious people that religion is required for morality. The question is often posed to me as a non beliver, why dont I go out and kill if I do not believe in god? My answer is simple, that we have evolved brains that can work out that constant violence is not in our mutual interest. Morality evolves, it has been and will continue to do so.
But on a dull day at work with nothing to do I decdied to put something to the test. If as theists claim adandoning god leads to ruin then there should be some direct evidence of this. I decided to corrleate non beliefe with the murder rate in the worlds 15 weaalthiest nations. In order to try and compare like with like I chose the top 15 wealtheist nations in the world, I ignored small banking islands by excluding any nation with less than 1 mio people and ignored countries who were not democracies. This I believe enables us to compare similar socio economic conditions. If the theists are right there should be a high correlation between unbelievers and the murder rate. I used data from Wipedia and average data from
http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html

what did I get? a negative correlation of -.317. I then thought maybe I can make my results more accurate. After all there is easyly accesible data on gdp per head rates. Its not unreasonbale to assume the richer one is the less likely one is to commit a murder. So I adjusted the crime rates to be wieghted by the differential gdp rates. That way I believe my comparsion is even more "like with like". What did I get then? -.37.
So next time a theist says religion is needed for moralty ask them why I didnt get a high positive correlation, indeed why did I get a negative corrleation?

My god man. You're doing WAY to much thinking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Like my mothers holier than thou religous ex-partner that would preach christianity and morality and question my self an my brothers ethics for not attending church and the mother fucker blames my brother (that is open about his liking of porn) on the 'teen' porn found on my mums computer.
he lied to try to cover his ass but didn't realise the honesty within our family and made himself look like a schmuck, he then dumped my old lady for another unsuspecting woman and still preaches his faith and morality.:S

the bible can forgive any sin if it is interpreted in your favour.

not all christians are like that but many are!
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Religion is simply a roadmap. It is not necessarily needed for morality (people's standard). God's moral law is written on the hearts of all people whether they believe or not. However, ALL fall short of God's standard and are guilty (including Christians).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Given that In Chrstian belief god created us and our nature maybe he set the standard too high if everyone falls short?



Perhaps "The Designer" just did a rotten job.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Thats lucky, 'cos a lot of the moral law written in the bible is atrocious.



There's civil, ceremonial, and moral law recorded in the Bible. They differ.



I seem to remember that god was hot on striking down those who disobeyed his moral laws back in those days. The israelites were never punished for their shockingly evil civil laws, ipso facto God approved of them.

They may not be moral laws that the bible obliges us to follow today, but they are examples of behaviour that god finds morally acceptable.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Thats lucky, 'cos a lot of the moral law written in the bible is atrocious.



There's civil, ceremonial, and moral law recorded in the Bible. They differ.



Unfortunately they do not seem to be well differentiated, and different people differentiate them in different ways.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Thats lucky, 'cos a lot of the moral law written in the bible is atrocious.



There's civil, ceremonial, and moral law recorded in the Bible. They differ.



Unfortunately they do not seem to well differentiated, and different people differentiate them in different ways.



That too.
As an aside to Paj - the hotel that hosts the British Parachute Ass'n AGM (and pissup) has a 10 foot high statue of Poseidon in their foyer. Is that one of the ten most immoral things they could do?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is a conversation I had with a religious person ...

Person: Without religion, what is to stop you from killing someone?

Me: The fact that I would be killing someone.

Person: But there aren't any repercussions, you won't go to hell.

It is frightening that there exist people who believe that without religion there would be no morality (and would kill someone if they didn't fear going to hell).
"That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I seem to remember that god was hot on striking down those who disobeyed his moral laws back in those days.



Still is. He's just withholding judgment now.

Quote

The israelites were never punished for their shockingly evil civil laws, ipso facto God approved of them.



There's a difference between tolerance and approval.

Quote

They may not be moral laws that the bible obliges us to follow today, but they are examples of behaviour that god finds morally acceptable.



It's an example of his long suffering patience. Not his acceptance. All sin will be punished.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

As an aside to Paj - the hotel that hosts the British Parachute Ass'n AGM (and pissup) has a 10 foot high statue of Poseidon in their foyer. Is that one of the ten most immoral things they could do?



Only if it represents what they worship above God. Is it an idol or just a statue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

There's a difference between tolerance and approval.



He chose the Israelites above all others to carry his message. He must have thought they were doing something right. And remember that those 'civil' laws of theirs were based on their religion.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

not all christians are like that but many are!



all that from a sample size of 1.... why aren't you working for MIT or CERN?



Either of those associated with CHAOS?

(That is who I work for).
" . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

God is a "He"? You're joking, right? If God is everywhere, don't you think it transcends gender? God makes much more sense as a verb, rather than a noun.



God has revealed Himself in three ways: In creation, in the Bible, and in Jesus (Rom. 1:18-20; 1 Cor. 15:3; John 5:39; Acts 10:43; Heb. 1:1-3; John 14:9). Jesus was a man. God does transcend gender. However, that's the reason we refer to him in the masculine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0