0
bodypilot90

war hungry?

Recommended Posts

Quote

What does Kinaa think we expect from France for helping liberate them? As far as I know we have never asked them for squat except common courtesy.



Well, obviously we expected them to support us in something they think is a bad idea. Or am I missing something here? Do you really think they said no because it was the US, or do you think that they were protecting their interests. That's what countries do. It's their job.

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"The folks that blasted you represent only 30% of the American population according to the latest polls. You shouldn't let it bother you as it seems you are the one that is more in touch with mainstream America."

Hmmm . . .just read something today that puts a wobble on your "spin".

"NEW YORK--Now it's official: most Americans are idiots.

Decades of budget cuts in education are finally yielding results, a fact confirmed by CNN's poll of March 16, which shows that an astonishing 51 percent of the public believe that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) was responsible for the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

There is no reason to think that. None. True, George W. Bush has asserted the existence of indirect links between low-level Al Qaeda operatives and Iraqi intelligence officials--a lame lie repeatedly denied by the CIA (news - web sites )--but even our professional prevaricator has never gone so far as to accuse Saddam of direct involvement in 9-11. Despite their increasingly tenuous grasp on reality, not even the Bush Administration's most fervent hawks deny that the secular dictator of Iraq (news - web sites) is a mortal enemy of the Islamist extremists of Al Qaeda. No mainstream media outlet has ever reported otherwise.

So why do these pinheads think such a thing?

Simple: the official Bushie pretexts given for launching a unilateral invasion of Iraq don't stick. If Saddam was going to launch nukes or anthrax missiles in our direction, he would have done so during the last dozen years, while American warplanes were pulverizing his military installations with weekly bombing raids. He'd certainly let us have it this week, now that Bush is revving up the war he wanted all along--but he won't, because he can't."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=127&e=13&u=/ucru/the_moron_majority
“Keep your elbow up!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Do you really think they said no because it was the US, or do you think that they were protecting their interests. That's what countries do. It's their job."

Thinking like a "patriot": No, they hate us for our freedom.

Shuhhhh . . . .
“Keep your elbow up!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0