0
Meso

Your Photos of the Past Year

Recommended Posts

Fixed.

+2 more to make up for it:

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/_n7lWe_JZn2g/TYildAb0YlI/AAAAAAAAABc/v6hDtR4hWq4/s512/%20Basilica%20S.%20Pietro%201024.jpg

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_n7lWe_JZn2g/TYilkxvONxI/AAAAAAAAABg/PesZIVD4UUQ/s720/%20Basilica%20S.%20Pietro%201.jpg

They look overly sharpened because of the picasa downres. Might soften them up a bit to look better online, but the prints should turn out nicely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some nice shots there, like the first ones lighting a lot.

I went on another nature photographic mission this past weekend and got a few more.

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5259/5543079804_af63bd48a4_z.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5100/5543075434_474e626109_z.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5180/5543076330_a520a50298_z.jpg

My new camera body also arrived yesterday (Canon 550D), so hoping to test it out this coming weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Loving the 550D so far. It was a good upgrade from the 350D. The AF is a lot better, the LCD is almost double the size, and much clearer in displaying the current settings. It can also be used for live view which can come in handy. The HD video recording mode is great, with good sound quality too- and allows for taking photos while filming. The body itself fits nicely in the hand, quite similar to the 350D in that aspect.

I'm currently saving for a Canon 400mm L 5.6 prime lens. The budget sigma 70-300mm just isn't sharp enough for me anymore, especially with my increasing interest in wildlife and bird photography.

Some shots from the 550D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice shots, what lens you shooting with?

That bird on the rock is pretty. And that giraffe and tree make a great scene. (I'd probably have tried to compose it so they were on the right of the image with white space on the left, but I'm a sucker for white space)

I'm trying to organize to make a trip to other countries in Africa in the next odd year. Lots to see in Botswana too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the info.

Was up in Bloemfontein earlier this year for a music festival and ended up coming across 2 giraffes crossing the road about 20 feet from us, one can't really appreciate their size until you experience them with your own eyes :)

I've been looking at all the options for a new telephoto lens lately. Between the 70-200 with extender, the 100-400mm L IS or the 400mm 5.6 prime.

Finally settled on the 400mm prime (one of the sharpest pieces of glass ever made). While not having IS, I've only heard good things about it. Apparently really good handheld as well which will suit me well with bird shots.

The 70-200mm offers some good speed if you only need 200mm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if I could afford it, I would have a few long primes :)

but most of my shots are landscape and sports, so I stick with 17-55 2.8 IS and a 70-200 2.8 IS and various extenders.

Primes cannot be beat for sharpness, and as a birder you will most likely be always looking for the longest piece of glass.

here's a really, really, REALLY nice one : http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=130498765133
I am sure you will be very happy with it !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah the primes are great and the 400mm L 5.6 isn't that badly priced considering. (Probably around $1200 or less). I would love the 600mm primes (or better yet the one in your link haha). But I could save for the rest of my life and still probably not be able to afford one.

I'm really into landscapes as well (storm chasing and storm cell structures), I recently purchased the Sigma 10-20mm. Though if one has the bit extra cash the Sigma 8-16mm looks great as well. Not as quick as a 2.8 so wouldn't be ideal for sport, though at that width it's solely for landscape anyway, but a very nice looking piece of glass the 8-16mm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I love the giraffe picture (1st one). They're all great, but that one just strikes me. I really like the shadow on the subject, a bit different than normal composition and contrast.

How much sharpening/other PP do you do? I absolutely hate PP and don't do anything behind simple sliders in Lightroom. It was kind of a waste to buy photoshop cs3, but I figure if I learn some basic stuff to do with it, I might actually start to enjoy playing around with some photos.

But whatever I do, I'm never really satisfied with how sharp my photos are - I'm pretty sure it's all user error, lack of understanding of light, and not very good settings in post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll chirp in with the sharpness topic - My close up animal portraits are currently shot with a sigma 70-300mm which is extremely soft at the 300mm end. Until recently I had done some post-processing on my shots such as temperature balance, light fill etc. The typical RAW post-processing.

But spending more time on photography sites lately, I've noticed that almost every professional photographer (specifically wild-life photographers) use sharpening quite a lot if an image appears soft. Even when they're shooting on 600 primes they sometimes add a touch of sharpening.

I have lightroom and photoshop CS5 (cs5 is amazing compared to the older versions). I'd definitely recommend CS5, the panoramic area of the program is greatly improved over older versions, and the content-aware area deletion is sometimes very useful, random bird flying past ruining the composure of a landscape shot is no longer a problem.

The Camera RAW editor is extremely useful though, giving one full flexibility over your photos (if you shoot in RAW, which I try do each time). Lightroom does offer you with a lot of useful abilities and sometimes I just use lightroom.

Anyway, back to sharpening. It will always help to sharpen your images, in essence all it's doing is correcting your lenses shortfallings, and as long as one doesn't go crazy with the sharpening, it doesn't look un-natural in any way. Camera RAW offers several methods of sharpening, a JPEG image can be sharpened with the Unsharp Mask which works well too, though prefer the flexibility of RAW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sick shot! That noise should be quite easy to remove though, at least I found it to be fairly easy with my old lightning shots (using Rebel XT and Kit lens).

Setting up photoshops noise reduction setting sliders to the right value. (The default sucks, I remember finding good settings on some tutorial sites). And then running 2 or 3 noise reduction passes should get 80%+ of that noise out the way, and not have to soften the edges too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0