rickjump1

Members
  • Content

    3,065
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by rickjump1

  1. Except for the part about her being cum laude from Princeton, a Harvard lawyer and marrying a half-white guy. Didn't she have some problems where she "gave up" her right to practice law. Never heard of a doctor or a lawyer giving up their professional credentials. You give up yours? http://www.wnd.com/2009/08/105998/ What do you make of "court ordered inactive status"? Wrong. Again.: http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/a/Obama-Law-License.htm Are you and regulator in some sort of competition to see who can act the bigger fool (especially) about Obama on these boards? "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you. Nope. No matter what Urban legends or snopes says, it's bs in favor of the Obamas. This is the President of the United States who lied about living with his illegal alien uncle, Benghazi, or Obamacare. This is in line with missing college transcripts and "his" murky past overlooked by you liberals. You believe what you want. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  2. Yeah. It reminds too many people not to steal. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  3. Except for the part about her being cum laude from Princeton, a Harvard lawyer and marrying a half-white guy. Didn't she have some problems where she "gave up" her right to practice law. Never heard of a doctor or a lawyer giving up their professional credentials. You give up yours? http://www.wnd.com/2009/08/105998/ What do you make of "court ordered inactive status"? Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  4. Gee Spence, don't sugarcoat it. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  5. Just prior to it, and also just after it. So could it be that this one phrase you've fixated on exists in the context of the other stuff he was saying at the same time, or is it that he just decided to announce his intention to create his own private army in two ssentences unconnected to any of the rest of his speech? Why don't you think real hard about that one. And once you've thought about it and reached the wrong conclusion yet again, try thinking about this one: why would a Presidential candidate, on the campaign trail, decide to announce that he wants a private army? Moreover, a candidate that you on the right have atacked for being unable to function without a teleprompter and a speech scripted to within an inch of its life? Why would that have been written into a speech? And once you've dismissed that objection as well, why not move onto this one: in the last 5 years, has the President created a private army? And yet... This went over the heads of most mainstream media because, like snopes, their heads were in the clouds for Barack. He said this little paragraph to back up campaign promises? He certainly started buying up large quantities of Ammunition and he woke a lot of people interested in keeping our freedoms that were fought and died for (you Brits probably remember that part). http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/02/17/Feds-Buy-2-Billion-Rounds-Of-Ammunition jakee you're in complete denial about anything that makes Barack look bad. It really shows. I think the civilian national force is the DHS. Did you remember this administration's talk about mandatory 3 yr. universal service or did that go over your head too? Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  6. There's nothing there and you know it. If you actually had Obama saying what you claim he's saying you'd have linked to it directly. But you don't, you've linked to a search page instead so you can claim that the words are in there somewhere. You should know how transparent you are. Transparency? Be patient your transparent hero is a little slow coming on, but he will:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fO-usAlqak How come some of his remarks are different from transcripts of his speeches: http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/3683/obama%e2%80%99s-civilian-national-security-force/ Quote:That little bit from Barack Obama’s speech on national service is not in the transcript of his prepared remarks. So just what does Senator Obama mean by this: We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Just prior to those two lines, Obama was talking about something quite different. He goes from talking about increasing the size of the US Foreign Service and opening consulates that have been shuttered (without telling us how he is going to pay for it) and doubling the size of the Peace Corps to the mother of all non-sequitors: We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” What exactly does Senator Obama mean by a “civilian national security force“? Is he referencing the ATF, FBI, or DEA? Or something new and different say like the Defense of the Revolution Brigades that they have in Cuba and Venezuela where neighbors spy on neighbors? Surely he can’t mean the US Foreign Service and the Peace Corps et al be funded in the billions of dollars. Whatever he is referencing it sounds like a dramatic departure from current practice and current funding. And why did it take the press so long to catch the discrepancy between the speech as delivered and the prepared remarks? Why are the references in the transcript to this deleted or omitted? Should we be worried? He was rather emphatic about it so I doubt that he just got carried away and ad libbed it. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  7. And he further said what he meant by it, and what he meant was about as far from an armed force or authority as it's possible to get. Google it and find out. Even if he meant what you think he meant it wouldn't be a private army, it would be another federal army. And he's already got one of those - it's called the Army. In his own words: http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=obama+talks+about+private+army&type=2button&fr=uh3_my_web_gs You need to be working for Snopes covering for their guy in the White House. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  8. Yeah, but there is no mention of honor killings, the genital mutilation of little girls, nor all those ungrateful immigrants who come here to blow us up. A little lame. Do you think they get away with this in Dallas? Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  9. Gun manufactures and retailers are actually in business. Of course they love people who live in fear of their president and government. This is a no brainer, and all they had to do is listen to some of Barack's early speeches when he said the country needs a "civilian defense force" comparable to the US Military in numbers and finance. Even the Canadians picked up on this:http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/47844Quote:"Four years ago this month—on July 2nd, 2008—Obama delivered a speech in Boulder, Colorado in which he promised the creation and establishment of a “Civilian National Security Force.” He further promised it would be “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the US Military.” It is well known amongst dictators, the world over, that a private army is necessary to control the great unwashed masses over which they force their rule." You want to hear him say it? Google it. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  10. You're an idiot. I like that jakee. Do you run around with a tin cup in your hand? I don't know what that means. Are you asking if I'm Kevin Costner? Do you think the President edits Snopes? Do you think the President is trying to disarm you by military force? Do you believe that the President is ridding the military of officers who won't shoot US civilians? Answer yes to any of the above questions (including the Costner thing) and you're probably an idiot too. When you think of someone with a tin cup in their hand, you think of someone blind or someone giving Jocko the monkey the day off. I'll pass on Jocko. I think you're blind. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  11. Batemen probably goes through a case of Mountain Dew everyday. Come again? The character in "Men in Black" that was the sugar freak could be LTC Bateman/Batman or one of Barack's lapdogs that would disarm us for a dog biscuit and a pat on the back. Bet they drink a case of Mountain Dew a day. A cigarette and a Mountain Dew is the "breakfast of champions" in some parts of the country. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  12. You're an idiot. I like that jakee. Do you run around with a tin cup in your hand? Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  13. Batemen probably goes through a case of Mountain Dew everyday. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  14. Snopes is in the tank for Obama, and it's doubtful that the original leftwing hippies actually own it anymore. They may work there, but that's all. Who pays them to protect Barack Hussein Obama is the big question? Little by little this president is attempting to circumnavigate the US Constitution. Do you think Snopes cares about this or the conspiracies of Barack Hussein Obama to impose socialized medicine on the country or his attempts to disarm us with the use of the military? They will cover Barack until he is gone, and then they will continue protecting the radical left's agenda. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  15. http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/army-officer-wants-disarmed-will-pry-gun-cold-dead-fingers/ "A report earlier this year from well connected philanthropist Dr. Jim Garrow claims that there is a new litmus test for military leadership: I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new 'litmus test' in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. 'The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not'. Those who will not are being removed. Obviously, Lt. Col. Robert Bateman passed the test with flying colors." LTC Robert Bateman is certainly "General" material and will crawl over the Constitution with his Commander-in-Chief to get a star. He, no doubt, feels it's his "duty". Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  16. http://patriotupdate.com/articles/american-schools-underperforming-underfunded/ "My layman’s diagnosis is pretty simple—our schools fail because ours society fails. Every societal ill eventually finds its way into schools, from unwed motherhood to drugs. Too many kids aren’t motivated to learn and too many teachers aren’t motivated to teach. It’s a baby-sitting service." Of course there's more to it than this. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  17. Let's be clear on this though, just because something dates back to biblical times doesn't make it right. Slavery for instance. Are you going to equate tattle tale kids with slavery? Seems a little harsh. Wow, you two are really no good at having a conversation with each other. Yes, but we try. Never give up. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  18. It most certainly did. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  19. This could be another one for Jay Leno. Making the teachers and the administrative staff look stupid could be a start in the right direction. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  20. Let's be clear on this though, just because something dates back to biblical times doesn't make it right. Slavery for instance. Are you going to equate tattle tale kids with slavery? Seems a little harsh. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  21. No wonder there are so many homeschooled kids. Anything with the government attached, is a recipe for disaster. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  22. Tattle tale girls go back to biblical times; like bows and arrows. Maybe the teacher was loosing control of her classroom and "outed" the two boys the quickest way. Kind of backfired on her. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  23. http://lastresistance.com/3949/boy-suspended-possession-imaginary-bow-arrow/"A Pennsylvania fifth grader named Johnny Jones was suspended for shooting an imaginary bow and arrow at a fellow classmate who initiated the fight by “shooting” Jones with his folder. The 5th grader had faced expulsion, but was instead given a one-day suspension. This will remain on his permanent record unless the Rutherford Institute, whom Jones’s parents retained to represent their son, can convince school officials to remove it." Where do these "stuck on stupid" teachers come from? Scary, the thought of them breeding. Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  24. I don't think Allen West hates the US government, but he has some choice words for it's leader. http://allenbwest.com/2013/12/obama-absolutist/ Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.
  25. How do you conclude this when he has deported more illegals than any previous President? JerryBaumchen Jerry, I think both of you are right....It may be more of a paper numbers game with BHO, but it's definitely documented. Who do you trust? Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.