0
rushmc

If the Foo Bird Shits

Recommended Posts

For all you poll lovers and billvon


Hard to consider Carvile a right wing source dont you think?

Quote




55 Percent of Likely Voters Find ‘Socialist’ an Accurate Label of Obama?

July 09, 2010 9:13 AM By Jim Geraghty
The latest poll by Democracy Corps, the firm of James Carville and Stan Greenberg, has Republicans leading on the generic ballot among likely voters, 48 percent to 42 percent.

Deep in the poll, they ask, “Now, I am going to read you a list of words and phrases which people use to describe political figures. For each word or phrase, please tell me whether it describes Barack Obama very well, well, not too well, or not well at all.”

On “too liberal,” 35 percent of likely voters say it describes Obama “very well,” 21 percent say “well,” 21 percent say “not too well,” and 17 percent say “not well at all.” In other words, 56 percent of likely voters consider Obama too liberal.

When asked about “a socialist,” 33 percent of likely voters say it describes Obama “very well,” 22 percent say “well,” 15 percent say “not too well,” and 25 percent say “not well at all.”

In other words, 55 percent of likely voters think “socialist” is a reasonably accurate way of describing Obama.



http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/230874/55-percent-likely-voters-find-socialist-accurate-label-obama


This is going to play in the up coming elections
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

"If the Foo Bird Shits"

I imagine that makes sense to someone; good luck with that.



It is based on an old joke related to the "if the shoe fits" line
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

"If the Foo Bird Shits"

I imagine that makes sense to someone; good luck with that.



Good come back Bill. Play the ball, not the player.


1. From the OP: "For all you poll lovers and billvon". So the thread started with a personal call-out.

2. The title of the thread: "If the Foo Bird Shits", which the aforesaid callee proceeded to comment upon.

But mostly #1. Personally, I don't think people should call out on other members, by name, who haven't posted to the thread yet, unless they expect the callee to respond in kind.
:|
Or to put it another way, if the foo shits, wear it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

"If the Foo Bird Shits"

I imagine that makes sense to someone; good luck with that.



Good come back Bill. Play the ball, not the player.


1. From the OP: "For all you poll lovers and billvon". So the thread started with a personal call-out.

2. The title of the thread: "If the Foo Bird Shits", which the aforesaid callee proceeded to comment upon.

But mostly #1. Personally, I don't think people should call out on other members, by name, who haven't posted to the thread yet, unless they expect the callee to respond in kind.
:|
Or to put it another way, if the foo shits, wear it.
Bill has been calling me out for months. And I called specifically on polls not billvon
Lucky has been lambasting Reagan for months

You want to be a mod dont you
But then you have indicated through many posts you feel you are smarter than those with whom you disagree

I meant you know all that happens in the courts and why
Just ask yourself:S
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

"If the Foo Bird Shits"

I imagine that makes sense to someone; good luck with that.



Good come back Bill. Play the ball, not the player.



1. From the OP: "For all you poll lovers and billvon". So the thread started with a personal call-out.



And of course the guy being called out did go on to make an actual comment about the content of the post, not just make a jab at the title.

Oh wait, no he didn't. Nice try at justifying it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0