mnealtx 0 #101 December 17, 2009 QuoteQuoteWhy do they selectively use some but not all the data? Selective data is not science, it is propaganda. Not true: poor tests = bad data. One always throws out bad data, even if it is slightly corrupt. If the premise of the test is false, you throw out the test. Unless you're a climate scientist, then it's the reverse.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,436 #102 December 17, 2009 >See we can actually agree on something in this thread and life on this planet is >not doomed. Mother Nature will find a way to adapt as she has done in the past. Agreed. There have been ice ages and warm periods before. And although you couldn't claim either one was _good_ for life on this planet (both caused massive extinctions) the remaining life adapted. >Would you agree that the human population growth in the last century is partially >responsible for the damage we have done? There are too many humans ... >especially in the developing world. Definitely. Less humans = less pollution of all sorts, from CO2 to CO to HC to plain old trash. >But Cap and Trade doesn't address this problem . . . Also agreed. It just allows reduction of pollution _without_ killing off people (or more accurately holding the birthrate down through governmental action.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
