0
SpeedRacer

The Government could ban something, but that doesn't make it disappear.

Recommended Posts

Government aggression doesn't work for everything.

The government can ban something, but that won't necessarily make the thing disappear.

It will only give that thing an illegal status.

So that thing will still exist, but there will be an illegal industry and/or criminal personalities supporting it.


Something to consider.
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Government aggression doesn't work for everything.

The government can ban something, but that won't necessarily make the thing disappear.

It will only give that thing an illegal status.

So that thing will still exist, but there will be an illegal industry and/or criminal personalities supporting it.


Something to consider.

And it's big bucks for certain countries>http://www.reason.com/blog/show/114164.html
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Government aggression doesn't work for everything.

The government can ban something, but that won't necessarily make the thing disappear.

It will only give that thing an illegal status.

So that thing will still exist, but there will be an illegal industry and/or criminal personalities supporting it.


Something to consider.




Enter prohibition....... the same RW nuts are trying that with drugs and gays..... when will these nuts leave alone the US Constitution and leave it for important issues like due process, slavery prohibition and other universally substantive measures? Yea, banning works.:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Enter prohibition....... the same RW nuts are trying that with drugs and gays..... when will these nuts leave alone the US Constitution and leave it for important issues like due process, slavery prohibition and other universally substantive measures? Yea, banning works



Yet you support others banning firearms?

Quote

just don't think for a second that our ability to legally own firearms is bulletproof.


"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>The government can ban something, but that won't necessarily make the
>thing disappear.

Right. The likelihood of a ban working is directly proportional to the difficulty of creating it and inversely proportional to how much people want it. Thus banning the possession of weapons grade plutonium works well; the banning of marijuana does not work so well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Enter prohibition....... the same RW nuts are trying that with drugs and gays..... when will these nuts leave alone the US Constitution and leave it for important issues like due process, slavery prohibition and other universally substantive measures? Yea, banning works



Yet you support others banning firearms?

Quote

just don't think for a second that our ability to legally own firearms is bulletproof.



Typical lefty. Its OK to ban things they don't like but leave their pet projects alone!
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Enter prohibition....... the same RW nuts are trying that with drugs and gays..... when will these nuts leave alone the US Constitution and leave it for important issues like due process, slavery prohibition and other universally substantive measures? Yea, banning works



Yet you support others banning firearms?

Quote

just don't think for a second that our ability to legally own firearms is bulletproof.



Typical lefty. Its OK to ban things they don't like but leave their pet projects alone!



How is that different from the righties?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you guys are all correct. on the right you have people wanting to use the Alimighty Government to ban drugs & abortion, on the left you got people wanting to do it with guns.
It seems to me that the only fair thing to do would be to strip down the government straight across the board.
And if you want to accomplish any lofty goals for society, do it using methods/institutions OUTSIDE the government.
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see your point but if it were up to me I would not ban anything, drugs included. Tax them heavily and let people choose their poison. Let them choose if they want an abortion. I am opposed to the above two on a personal level but to each his own.
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0