Recommended Posts
pajarito 0
QuoteQuote
If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal.
Might have nipped AIDS in the bud with this one.
Wow! That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever read! Any more words of wisdaom?
Where did AIDS originate, Einstein?
never pull low......unless you are
QuoteQuoteQuote
If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal.
Might have nipped AIDS in the bud with this one.
Wow! That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever read! Any more words of wisdaom?
Where did AIDS originate, Einstein?
Theoretically transmitted between primate and man... do you have proof it was sexual? Do you believe everything you hear?
Blog Clicky
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal.
Might have nipped AIDS in the bud with this one.
Wow! That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever read! Any more words of wisdaom?
Where did AIDS originate, Einstein?
Theoretically transmitted between primate and man... do you have proof it was sexual? Do you believe everything you hear?
Notice the word "might"? No I don't believe everything that I hear, your posts for example.
never pull low......unless you are
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal.
Might have nipped AIDS in the bud with this one.
Wow! That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever read! Any more words of wisdaom?
Where did AIDS originate, Einstein?
Theoretically transmitted between primate and man... do you have proof it was sexual? Do you believe everything you hear?
Notice the word "might"? No I don't believe everything that I hear, your posts for example.
So if I put "might" in front of an asenine statement about, say, the holocaust, that makes it OK?
And, yes, believe my posts... you may learn something!
I'll leave it at that. I don't believe in pissing matches over the internet. Too impersonal. Not nearly as fun as in person...
Blog Clicky
kallend 1,651
Quote
Or are you saying that the government has no business legislating morality, that is up to everyone's own conscience? That the government should mind its own business (the Libertarian viewpoint that I espouse).
It's not clear to me what you are trying to say.
I answered it once but I'll explain the answer. I think that the government should mind it's own business in personal matters. In other words, what two consenting adults (or three) do in the privacy of their own bedroom is no ones business but their own. I personally have no problem with most victimless crimes. If someone wants to ruin their life on cocaine, thats their problem. Crimes that involve other people are another matter. I don't have a problem with gay unions (or gays in general). It does not affect other people. I am in agreement that the are trying to hijack a word that already has a very definite meaning. Beyond that give them the same rights that I have, The gays should be careful what they ask for though they just might get it. Gay divorce is just around the corner.
OK, nothing to disagree with there.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites