eric.fradet

Members
  • Content

    98
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Feedback

    0%

eric.fradet last won the day on March 3

eric.fradet had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

1 Follower

Jump Profile

  • Number of Jumps
    25300
  • Years in Sport
    32

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. If you think about it . It is the only device which guarantee you the reserve will open only when both risers left ! Otherwise I agree it makes it more complicated to pack and special reserve loops....
  2. Does someone has something to add to PIA document concerning cleaning Tandem equipment from Covid 19 (specially tandem passenger harness) in order to start again the safest as possible ?
  3. hello someone from Skydive Deland (Florida), in attached file the document about Skydive City policy against Covid 19, someone can tell me if Skydive Deland practice the same policy against the virus, specially NOT wearing mask during freefall ? Skydive City Coronavirus Safety Protocols (1).docx
  4. hi Jerry, you want the document Cease and Desist to Sandy Reid, here you go in the attached file; Mister Zwicker should look at it again.... Cease and Desist to Sandy REID.docx
  5. I can prove Sandy uses the Mojo without my permission , it is easy, I cannot prove the same with Airborne so far , there is no public document showing the Mojo inside an Airborne rig, I am working on it...
  6. it cannot be licensed from Airborne since it is already patented by me
  7. hi Jerry, well Airborne also infringed my patent, big companies have not respect for individual as long you do not sue them....
  8. Well Sandy Reid already stole the Mojo from me, The patent office studied my patent and the MOJO device, and found a violation of claim #1, the main and most important one. Instead of working out with me the disagreement, from last November on, Sandy REID has stayed silent, since he knows that he is wrong. I have to go through the legal step of filing a complaint asserting patent Infringement. i surely do, but now, it will be against Sunpath...
  9. they are good in what they are doing, they know their job and they provide the best they can, you can trust them...
  10. M. Fradet is under the impression that the RI MARD is based on the bridle-unfolding principle that is the basis of his patent. __________________________________________________ I am not under an impression, Loic Jean Albert was my team mate and I let him used this technology which falls under my patent US 8,074,934 B2, you should read it before saying anything. In any cases it means, the skyhook does not have to live a long time
  11. Yes Rigging Innovations uses my device with my agreement, and actually I have to say it is a better principle than the Skyhook, UPT made this last one more and more complicated and it is still does not work properly (for instance if the knot on the sealing thread is not tight enough, the skyhook will disconnect instead to hold..)
  12. I cannot tell, we do not have much feedback from the field, at this time, specially it will be interesting to know if it is rigger's friendly ?
  13. Sunrise Rigging could add a Collins lanyard device since the patent is getting over, but it will make the system more complex, and actually this Boost MARD is the best one on the market..
  14. I think you are wrong, when you are in the parachute industry , you are supposed to know who has been invented such device, you ask for the permission to use it, it is not only a matter of money, it is also a matter to be honest with the inventor who is proud of his product and deserve his recognition from others, if it is a good invention. For instance, I do not ask as much money for my invention as Bill Booth sells his, and I pretend my device works better than the Skyhook, which his not reliable, I know that there are many riggers out on the field that absolutely refuse to pack Skyhook because it is so complicated. In this sport, nobody wants to pay for something they can try to get for free, If there is no patent how do you know who was the first one to successfully create something new to move forward ? it will not be fair for someone involving time and money to not be paid off for his effort to make the sport safer. Now you are right on one point : the most beautiful invention are anonymous .. who knows who is the inventor of the single layer canopy with glide ratio is point 9 and flies great in European mountains since 4 years ?