Remster 24 #26 July 25, 2014 Quote Now it's up to the Supremes. My understanding is, if that circuit agrees to take on the case as a whole, its past previous decisions are voided until their new ruling comes out.Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #27 July 25, 2014 RemsterQuote Now it's up to the Supremes. My understanding is, if that circuit agrees to take on the case as a whole, its past previous decisions are voided until their new ruling comes out. Yep, that's correct. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 24 #28 July 25, 2014 And hence, the supreme may not have to get involved (until whomever appeals the next decision).Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #29 July 26, 2014 RemsterAnd hence, the supreme may not have to get involved (until whomever appeals the next decision). That's partly correct. If the 2 circuit appeal courts ultimately rule the same way, the Supreme Court does automatically have to get involved, since there would be no tie to break. That said, in this case, given what's at stake, I'd expect whomever ultimately loses in each circuit to appeal to the Supreme Court; and although the Supreme Court can either agree or decline to hear the appeal(s), on an issue of this importance I'd predict the S.C. will agree to hear the appeal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites