kallend 1,646 #51 June 16, 2013 normiss wow Pretty sad that you support selective killings. Negates a lot of your arguments. However, in response to your chilling perspective, I would expect their families may. Where did I write that I support it? I wasn't the one suggesting eliminating the mentally ill, either.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #52 June 16, 2013 kallend ***wow Pretty sad that you support selective killings. Negates a lot of your arguments. However, in response to your chilling perspective, I would expect their families may. Where did I write that I support it? I wasn't the one suggesting eliminating the mentally ill, either. One of the most ridiculous, "who me?", non-answer, dodge-the-bullet, misdirection back-pedaling posts ever. Congrats. My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #53 June 17, 2013 kallendWell, maybe the folks who repeatedly bring up Chicago's murder rate will take notice of your point, since it is due overwhelmingly to gang bangers offing each other. (Besides, in terms of murders per 100,000 population Chicago isn't even in the top ten US cities). Oh, but we do! http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/1-Dead-12-Wounded-in-Overnight-Shootings-211673851.html Skews your murder rate a little. What was that about Chi-town and gun laws again?My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,646 #54 June 17, 2013 popsjumper***Well, maybe the folks who repeatedly bring up Chicago's murder rate will take notice of your point, since it is due overwhelmingly to gang bangers offing each other. (Besides, in terms of murders per 100,000 population Chicago isn't even in the top ten US cities). Oh, but we do! http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/1-Dead-12-Wounded-in-Overnight-Shootings-211673851.html Skews your murder rate a little. What was that about Chi-town and gun laws again? Been taking statistics lessons from brenthutch?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,646 #55 June 17, 2013 popsjumper ******wow Pretty sad that you support selective killings. Negates a lot of your arguments. However, in response to your chilling perspective, I would expect their families may. Where did I write that I support it? I wasn't the one suggesting eliminating the mentally ill, either. One of the most ridiculous, "who me?", non-answer, dodge-the-bullet, misdirection back-pedaling posts ever. Congrats. Translation - you can't find anything so you sling mud.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #56 June 17, 2013 kallend Translation - you can't find anything so you sling mud. See? You are a good 'teacher'! I learned it from you and you didn't even realize it's your own normal M.O.! Do I get an A for the class? Whatever happened to your response about skewed numbers and Chi-town's murder rates? Oh, that's right...your M.O. blocked an intelligent response. Quote I wasn't the one suggesting eliminating the mentally ill, either. You're correct. I wouldn't think you'd recognize how wonderful that would be if we could eliminate mental illness.My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,646 #57 June 17, 2013 popsjumper *** Translation - you can't find anything so you sling mud. See? You are a good 'teacher'! I learned it from you and you didn't even realize it's your own normal M.O.! Do I get an A for the class? Whatever happened to your response about skewed numbers and Chi-town's murder rates? Oh, that's right...your M.O. blocked an intelligent response. Quote I wasn't the one suggesting eliminating the mentally ill, either. You're correct. I wouldn't think you'd recognize how wonderful that would be if we could eliminate mental illness. Your post didn't talk of eliminating mental illness. The reference was to "a mentally unstable person". Quote If you had the power to eliminate one OR the other, which one would you eliminate? It appears that you'd keep the unstable and do away with the AR15. Intellectual dishonesty on your part. And still you can't find anything to support the claim so you continue to sling mud.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,646 #58 June 17, 2013 popsjumper Whatever happened to your response about skewed numbers and Chi-town's murder rates? Chi-town isn't even in the top ten US cities: www.policymic.com/articles/22686/america-s-10-deadliest-cities-2012... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #59 June 17, 2013 Last year's numbers, maybe. They are giving this year one hell of an effort though! It's ok though, just them inner city troublemakers we can do without. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,646 #60 June 17, 2013 normiss Last year's numbers, maybe. They are giving this year one hell of an effort though! Chicago homicides DOWN 34% over 2012 for the same period in 2013. FACTS can be so inconvenient. Chicago is not even in the top 10 US cities for murders. I wonder why the gun lobby never mentions Memphis, Birmingham AL, St. Louis or New Orleans, all of which ARE in the top 10. (Well, I don't really wonder).... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #61 June 17, 2013 So long as we have the Second Amendment, I could care less what anybody does. Legal owners are not the problem. Legal ownership is not the problem. Nice weekend in Chicago? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,646 #62 June 17, 2013 normiss Nice weekend in Chicago? Very nice, thanks. Strolled by the lake, flew my plane, spent time with the GF, did some gardening.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,646 #63 June 17, 2013 normiss Legal owners are not the problem. Legal ownership is not the problem. Agreed. Keeping guns away from those who are legally prohibited from having them is the problem.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #64 June 17, 2013 Agreed. I'm curious if this loophole will be closed with ACA - since the gooberment will then have open access to ALL of our medical data, surely they can blacklist someone based on any number of dis-qualifiers. The majority of which will have no logical reasons I'm sure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,646 #65 June 17, 2013 normissAgreed. I'm curious if this loophole will be closed with ACA - since the gooberment will then have open access to ALL of our medical data, surely they can blacklist someone based on any number of dis-qualifiers. The majority of which will have no logical reasons I'm sure. I bet the NSA can access them RIGHT NOW.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #66 June 17, 2013 damn. that's not funny. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #67 June 18, 2013 http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56470467-78/evans-jennings-church-croyle.html.csp mass shooting [mas shoot-ing] n. 1) Any event where a firearm is discharged or firearms are discharged and more than one person is injured or killed (as a result of the firearm discharge(s) or otherwise.) 2) Any event where more than one firearm is discharged, or a firearm is discharged more than once. (note: no one need be injured or killed.) 3) Any event where a firearm is discharged during mass. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
