kallend 1,651 #1 February 17, 2012 First they mess up the Iowa results. Now this. I doubt these folks could organize a piss-up in a brewery.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewGuy2005 51 #2 February 17, 2012 We have organized a pretty good circular firing squad. Give us credit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #3 February 17, 2012 Quote First they mess up the Iowa results. Now this. I doubt these folks could organize a piss-up in a brewery. You appear to be assuming that they weren't intentionally trying to do this."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #4 February 17, 2012 The greatest advantage Obama has is that he's going against Republicans. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,651 #5 February 17, 2012 QuoteQuote First they mess up the Iowa results. Now this. I doubt these folks could organize a piss-up in a brewery. You appear to be assuming that they weren't intentionally trying to do this. OK, but my 2 year old grandson can organize chaos.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #6 February 17, 2012 QuoteQuote You appear to be assuming that they weren't intentionally trying to do this. OK, but my 2 year old grandson can organize chaos. maintaining Romney momentum is an attempt to organize order, not chaos. What Maine really says is that election results should never be released until all votes are in, even if that's going to be a week later. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,435 #7 February 17, 2012 >You appear to be assuming that they weren't intentionally trying to do this. True. They could be holding out hope that someone electable comes along, at which point they could say "hey, all those other primaries were too close to call/too mismanaged/just too freaking hard to add up, why not just start over with a clean slate?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #8 February 20, 2012 I didn't mean they intended to get caught. I meant they intended to alter the results ..."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,651 #9 February 20, 2012 QuoteI didn't mean they intended to get caught. I meant they intended to alter the results ... Could be hoping for a brokered convention so they can get a halfway decent candidate instead of one of the jokers currently running.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,651 #10 February 20, 2012 www.youtube.com/watch?v=era8KBFSmHU&feature=share... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #11 February 20, 2012 QuoteQuoteI didn't mean they intended to get caught. I meant they intended to alter the results ... Could be hoping for a brokered convention so they can get a halfway decent candidate instead of one of the jokers currently running. More than likely they want to get rid of Ron Paul so that their voters will focus on the candidates they want."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,651 #12 March 1, 2012 They're at it again. Not sure if it's incompetence or gerrymandering this time. www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iYtg8tiC3naKXHfohh5QbB2UeDxw?docId=738326a3d37e4ad2b9a0aa7e9519e7c5... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #13 March 2, 2012 Quote They're at it again. Not sure if it's incompetence or gerrymandering this time. www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iYtg8tiC3naKXHfohh5QbB2UeDxw?docId=738326a3d37e4ad2b9a0aa7e9519e7c5 certainly not the party you'd like to see in charge of a next generation of Diebold voting machines. Santorum is nuts if he wants to call it a tie because of the delegate allocations, but wtf is the GOP going to abide by their own rules? They sure were sticklers back in 2000 in Florida. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
