kallend 1,651 #1 April 10, 2010 online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304222504575173803522442196.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5 Justice Stevens to retire.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #2 April 10, 2010 Quoteonline.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304222504575173803522442196.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5 Justice Stevens to retire.And your point IS?I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #3 April 10, 2010 QuoteQuoteonline.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304222504575173803522442196.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5 Justice Stevens to retire.And your point IS? That there's to be more fun for the Senate. Duh. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,353 #4 April 10, 2010 Quote Quote Quote online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304222504575173803522442196.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5 Justice Stevens to retire. And your point IS? That there's to be more fun for the Senate. Duh. Well, I think the folks having the real fun are going to be the ones spinning why Candidate X is (or isn't) qualified, liberal enough, conservative enough, the right race/gender, old enough, idealogically "pure" enough and on and on. On the positive side, the Senate is going to be busy enough with this that they won't have time to do anything else that's controversial. Anybody want to place bets on which minority (or combination of) this candidate is going to be? Has there been an Asian on the SC yet??"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 58 #5 April 10, 2010 I'm curious, is the POTUS authorized to make appointments to the USSC when Congress is in recess and avoid the confirmation process? If so BHO could guarantee another liberal replacement for Justice Stevens. QuoteQuoteQuoteonline.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304222504575173803522442196.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5 Justice Stevens to retire.And your point IS? That there's to be more fun for the Senate. Duh.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #6 April 10, 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States#Recess_appointments Quote Recess appointments When the Senate is in recess, the President may make a temporary appointment without the Senate's advice and consent. Such a recess appointee to the Supreme Court holds office only until the end of the next Senate session (at most, less than two years). To continue to serve thereafter and be compensated for his or her service, the Senate must confirm the nominee. Of the two Chief Justices and six Associate Justices who have received recess appointments, only Chief Justice John Rutledge was not subsequently confirmed for a regular appointment. No president since Dwight Eisenhower has made a recess appointment to the Supreme Court and the practice has become highly controversial even when applied to lower federal courts. So there you go. The vast liberal conspiracy marches on. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 58 #7 April 10, 2010 Thanks, I forget just how broad and exhaustive wikipedia is. Quotehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States#Recess_appointments Quote Recess appointments When the Senate is in recess, the President may make a temporary appointment without the Senate's advice and consent. Such a recess appointee to the Supreme Court holds office only until the end of the next Senate session (at most, less than two years). To continue to serve thereafter and be compensated for his or her service, the Senate must confirm the nominee. Of the two Chief Justices and six Associate Justices who have received recess appointments, only Chief Justice John Rutledge was not subsequently confirmed for a regular appointment. No president since Dwight Eisenhower has made a recess appointment to the Supreme Court and the practice has become highly controversial even when applied to lower federal courts. So there you go. The vast liberal conspiracy marches on.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #8 April 10, 2010 QuoteI forget just how broad and exhaustive wikipedia is. Indeed it is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_conspiracy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_conspiracy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,651 #9 April 10, 2010 Quote Quote online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304222504575173803522442196.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5 Justice Stevens to retire. And your point IS? Ummm, I wonder what it could be. ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wayneflorida 0 #10 April 12, 2010 Would be a good time to increase to court to 25. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #11 April 12, 2010 QuoteWould be a good time to increase to court to 25. Been down that road already: FDR tried to do it, but got smacked down. No can do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #12 April 12, 2010 http://www.salon.com/wires/allwires/04/12/D9F1G8B02_us_obama_supreme_court/index.html QuotePsst: Sec'y Hillary Rodham Clinton for court? Sen. Orrin Hatch says he's heard Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's name mentioned in connection with the Supreme Court vacancy brought about by the retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens. Hatch didn't elaborate in an interview Monday. Appearing with Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy on NBC's "Today" show, the Utah Republican said only, "I heard Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's name today and that would be an interesting person in the mix." Hatch wouldn't say whether he'd support Clinton. But he did say "I like Hillary Rodham Clinton" and said he thinks she's done a good job for Democrats. Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, retorted: "I think she's done a good job for the country, not just for Democrats." MUUHAHAHAHAAA! Hey, all you fuckers! Your heads will explode! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites