.........but not under oath

[Royd 0]

Quote

What goes around, comes around. Man up and deal with it.

So you're saying it's all about revenge and pay back? How grownup of them.

Quote

US Attorneys were fired and replaced via a newly enacted law that was snuck into the "patriot act" by the sleazebag republicans.

You can't sneak anything into a bill if the legislators are about the business of doing their job.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

What goes around, comes around. Man up and deal with it.

So you're saying it's all about revenge and pay back? How grownup of them.

Quote

US Attorneys were fired and replaced via a newly enacted law that was snuck into the "patriot act" by the sleazebag republicans.

You can't sneak anything into a bill if the legislators are about the business of doing their job.

Yet your side would defend the recent Republican Congressional garbage for shooting down teh federal min wage increase by saying Clinton would have refused to sign the 2nd min wage incr (he did sign and implement the first one) since it had all kinds of tax benefits for the rich packed in it. Clinton did say he would sign a min wage incr if sent up alone w/o the goodies packed in it, so you are contradicting yourself.

[tbrown 26]

It's been barely a week since Alberto Gonzalez stated he was not involved in the firings. It has now been established beyond any doubt that he took part in an hour long meeting on the subject and signed off on the plan.

Whatever conclusions may be reached, it is now plain that sworn testimony must be taken. An off the record, private conversation may have been good enough for the rubber stamp single party rule Republicans who used to run the congress, but it's gone too far now. It has to be got at in public and under oath. And there will be "loyalist" Reublican members of congress present who can ask their own friendly questions and try to put some spin on it.

Either way, the votes for an impeachment aren't there, impeachment is only for blowjobs.

Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity !

[rushmc 18]

Quote

Did you really expect to get a sensable response when you post a degrading, insulting general attack against everyone you disagree with??

Now that is funny

Emphasis mine.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

It's been barely a week since Alberto Gonzalez stated he was not involved in the firings. It has now been established beyond any doubt that he took part in an hour long meeting on the subject and signed off on the plan.

Whatever conclusions may be reached, it is now plain that sworn testimony must be taken. An off the record, private conversation may have been good enough for the rubber stamp single party rule Republicans who used to run the congress, but it's gone too far now. It has to be got at in public and under oath. And there will be "loyalist" Reublican members of congress present who can ask their own friendly questions and try to put some spin on it.

Either way, the votes for an impeachment aren't there, impeachment is only for blowjobs.

Agreed, but impeachment is done by the House and the votes are there. Just like Brownie, Bush will soon shed his backing for yet another crappy appointee.