0
Gravitymaster

Kerry Implodes ????

Recommended Posts

Quote

Oh, I guess maybe that wasn't a lie, since he attributed it to the Britich government and didn't say "I learned..."



No it was not a lie since he had reports saying both....He might have made a mistake to go with the wrong one...

But its not a lie....Its just being wrong.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Try to stay consistent Benny. Above, it was all about the way that Rumsfeld worded it. Now you want to discount how Bush worded his speech. Use logic instead of emotion, it'll be easier to stay consistent.



I think I've been pretty consistent at pointing out how the administration has mislead the American public, regardless of the wording they used. Why did he attribute that uranium claim to the Brits, was it because he thought they really should get credit, or maybe because his speechwriters knew it would give him an out when the shit eventually hit the fan. Absolutely, Rumsfelds wording led the public to believe that he was stating a fact, however this was during an unscripted interview. The SOTU address also gave the impression of fact although it also gave the pres a clever escape to those who would rightfully claim he lied, or was just "wrong", what have you.

Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

He would have been just wrong if he had said, we think we know where they are, but he didn't say that, he said he knew.



Rumsfield's sources told him it was there, so he took it as fact. If anything, Rumsfield is guilty of putting too much faith into the sources.

Look at it from this perspective: If Rumsfield knew the intel was false, and that the WMDs weren't really there, would he have made such a statement knowing it would be brought out as false later on?

Hardly. The man would have to be an idiot to have intentionally lied in making that statement. Despite his fateful phraseology, it was still just a mistake.


. . =(_8^(1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


#1. That is not the same as Bush lying.



How about...

Quote

The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.



Quote

But the CIA official has said that a former US diplomat had already established the claim was false in March 2002 - and that the information had been passed on to government departments, including the White House, well before Mr Bush mentioned it in the speech.



Oh, I guess maybe that wasn't a lie, since he attributed it to the Britich government and didn't say "I learned..."



Try to stay consistent Benny. Above, it was all about the way that Rumsfeld worded it. Now you want to discount how Bush worded his speech. Use logic instead of emotion, it'll be easier to stay consistent.



When someone's consistent you accuse them of beating a dead horse. Try to be consistent, will you?

I think this administration lied with respect to:

1. Existence of WMD in Iraq at all

2. Potential for deloyment of Iraqi WMDs in 45 minutes. Classic scare tactic to get the war drums beating.

3. African uranium when they had been told by the CIA that it was not likely to be true

4. Telling the nation the deficit would reduce while enacting policies that anyone could see would make it increase (and it did).

5. Telling the nation unemployment would reduce while enacting policies that would do the reverse (and did).

6. Claiming to be a "compassionate conservative" while being neither compassionate nor conservative.

7. Campaigning on a platform of reduced government, and then increasing the size of the federal bureaucracy.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

He would have been just wrong if he had said, we think we know where they are, but he didn't say that, he said he knew.



Again all the people that "knew" the world was flat are liars?

How about all the folks that "knew" that fire was an element that was released from materials?

No, you can have say the truth about somethings and it can be wrong.

And you can't PROVE he lied...You might be able to prove he was wrong.



How does that apply to the African uranium? He had been told ahead of the speech that the intelligence was bogus.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Oh, I guess maybe that wasn't a lie, since he attributed it to the Britich government and didn't say "I learned..."



No it was not a lie since he had reports saying both....He might have made a mistake to go with the wrong one...

But its not a lie....Its just being wrong.



So the administration dismisses the CIA intelligence when it's correct, but uses it in all cases when it turns out to be wrong. What an amazing stroke of bad luck! :P Or poor judgement.:P

A simpler explanation is that they lied.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

He would have been just wrong if he had said, we think we know where they are, but he didn't say that, he said he knew.



Rumsfield's sources told him it was there, so he took it as fact. If anything, Rumsfield is guilty of putting too much faith into the sources.

Look at it from this perspective: If Rumsfield knew the intel was false, and that the WMDs weren't really there, would he have made such a statement knowing it would be brought out as false later on?

Hardly. The man would have to be an idiot to have intentionally lied in making that statement. Despite his fateful phraseology, it was still just a mistake.



I like the "idiot" choice myself.

Now, you have absolutely no idea what the actual intelligence provided to the administration was. All you know is what they have released.

I suspect they made a calculated risk based on sketchy and conflicting intelligence and the strong desire that it be true 'cos they were itching for a fight, dismissed the conflicting part when they made the case to Congress, and were caught out when their version turned out to be bogus.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kerry was on meet the press just a few weeks ago and said that he believed there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and not just because the current administration said so. He said (I will paraphrase here because I don't have the exact quote in front of me but I'm sure the transcripts are there if you really want to look them up.) that he whent to the cia, fbi, those that were in charge of intellegence when clinton was in office and others and all of them were convinced of the existance of wmd's in Iraq.
So it seems to me that it is an intellegence problem or kerry was in on the lie from the begining.

Death is so permanant, and I'm just not ready for that kind of committment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I suspect they made a calculated risk based on sketchy and conflicting intelligence and the strong desire that it be true 'cos they were itching for a fight, dismissed the conflicting part when they made the case to Congress, and were caught out when their version turned out to be bogus.



Actually, I don't completely disagree with you there.

However, I don't believe the intel was quite as "sketchy and conflicting" as you wish it were. ;)


. . =(_8^(1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I suspect they made a calculated risk based on sketchy and conflicting intelligence and the strong desire that it be true 'cos they were itching for a fight, dismissed the conflicting part when they made the case to Congress, and were caught out when their version turned out to be bogus.



Actually, I don't completely disagree with you there.

However, I don't believe the intel was quite as "sketchy and conflicting" as you wish it were. ;)



We do know what Hans Blix and the UN inspectors reported. And we do know that the Bush administration bad-mouthed them at every opportunity. We know that Powell went to the UN with "intel" that he wouldn't show Blix ahead of time. And we now know that Powell admits it was no good.

In fact, we now know that Blix was right and Bush was wrong. The one time Bush chose to disregard trhe CIA was the one time they were right, if we are to believe the apologists.

I think there's a simpler explanation, one that doesn't defy the rules of probability. The administration lied.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Kerry was on meet the press just a few weeks ago and said that he believed there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and not just because the current administration said so. He said (I will paraphrase here because I don't have the exact quote in front of me but I'm sure the transcripts are there if you really want to look them up.) that he whent to the cia, fbi, those that were in charge of intellegence when clinton was in office and others and all of them were convinced of the existance of wmd's in Iraq.
So it seems to me that it is an intellegence problem or kerry was in on the lie from the begining.



Surmise all you want. The director of the CIA and NSA and the other acronym agencies report to the President, and they only reveal what the administration allows them to reveal.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think there's a simpler explanation, one that doesn't defy the rules of probability. The administration lied.



I think your theory does defy the rules of probability. If Bush and his staff were intentionally untruthful, they would have to have realized that this would eventually become known. Sorry, it just doesn't make sense that they would go down this road knowingly.


. . =(_8^(1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I think there's a simpler explanation, one that doesn't defy the rules of probability. The administration lied.



I think your theory does defy the rules of probability. If Bush and his staff were intentionally untruthful, they would have to have realized that this would eventually become known. Sorry, it just doesn't make sense that they would go down this road knowingly.



A bit earlier I gave 7 examples where Bush or one of his cronies made a statement that later turned out to be untrue or contradicted by his actions. The probability that he was not lying in at least one case is very small. Incidentally, I could have provided more examples.

Regardless, being WRONG in seven important items is strong evidence of total incompetance.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The latest

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004072203,00.html

John Kerry girl tells all



Affair ... Alex Polier




From BRIAN FLYNN
in New York

THE beauty said to have had a fling with presidential hopeful John Kerry has recorded a bombshell tell-all interview.

Journalist Alex Polier taped a talk with a US TV network at Christmas.

The former Washington intern, 27, told all about an alleged fling with the 60-year-old super-rich senator in spring 2001.


Hopeful ... John Kerry

The channel is sitting on the tape until it has enough evidence to back her story. If the sex claims are true, they would shatter his White House hopes. Kerry, a married dad of two, has denied the fling. But Alex told pals she fled to Kenya on his suggestion.

One TV source said: “She wants to tell her story. She has talked at length about her relationship with Kerry. But no one is believing her.”

Kerry was front-runner for the Democratic nomination to take on George Bush in November. His hopes were hit as hints of a scandal emerged.

and:
http://www.nationaudio.com/News/DailyNation/Today/News/mainNews1602200453.html

Kerry intern hiding in Kenya
By NATION Reporter
and Agencies
The young intern at the centre of a furore involving United States presidential hopeful John Kerry is hiding out in Kenya.

Alex Polier, 24, has been in the country for the past few weeks visiting her fiancee, Mr Yaron Schwartzman, who works with FilmStudios, along Nairobi's Ngong Road.

Ms Polier, who could end Senator John Kerry's hopes of becoming the next president of the United States, is alleged to have had a two-year affair with the front-runner for the Democratic nomination.

"This is not going to go away," one American friend of Ms Polier said yesterday. "What actually happened is much nastier than is being reported."

The allegations come at a crucial time for the senator. Polls showed him leading Mr Bush by 52 per cent to 42 per cent, and aides will be anxious to see if the apparent scandal affects his standing among voters.

Ms Polier, a former intern who also spent some time in 1998 doing work experience at the Houses of Parliament in London, is in Kenya staying with Mr Schwartzman.

It was not immediately clear what Mr Schwartzman does at FilmStudios. Efforts to contact the family home in the leafy suburb of Lavington were fruitless.

Miss Polier and her fiance were believed to be hiding at the Nairobi home of Mr Schwartzman's parents, who moved to Kenya from Israel.

Mr Joseph Schwartzman is the chairman of the H Young group of companies. His wife, Hannah, is described by friends to be a devout Jew who was hoping to see her future daughter-in-law convert to Judaism before the wedding ceremony planned for some time later in the year.

The Nation has established, however, that the couple were students together at Columbia University in New York.

Both have refused to make any comment on her alleged links with Senator Kerry, who is married to Teresa Heinz Kerry, heiress to a food empire.

Senator Kerry, a decorated Vietnam veteran dubbed the new JFK, has vehemently denied any relationship with Miss Polier and shrugged off allegations that he had a two-year affair with her from 2001. He said: "I just deny it categorically. It's rumour. It's untrue. Period."

Mr Kerry flatly denied swirling rumours about an extramarital affair, assuring backers that his campaign was not vulnerable to a sudden sex scandal.

Mr Kerry, married once before, was something of a playboy after his divorce, dating starlets Morgan Fairchild and Catherine Oxenberg.

Mrs Heinz-Kerry, who has been a fixture on the campaign trail, is no shrinking violet. She once told a writer for Elle magazine that she would jokingly warn her first husband that if he ever strayed, "I'll maim you. Not kill you, just maim you."

Mr Kerry, 60, has won 12 out of the 14 Democratic primaries and has looked all but certain to seal the nomination to take on President George W. Bush in November's elections.

His aides have blamed a dirty tricks campaign for bringing the allegations about Miss Polier into the public eye; they first surfaced last week on a right-wing internet site, the Drudge Report, which famously first broke the news of Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky.

Ms Polier's parents, Terry and Donna, from Malvern, Pennsylvania, added fuel to the fire by claiming that Mr Kerry did pursue their daughter.

Said Mr Polier: "I think he's a sleazeball. I did wonder if she didn't get that feeling herself. He's not the sort of guy I'd choose to be with my daughter. John Kerry called my daughter and invited her to be on his re-election committee. She talked to him and decided against it."

The Drudge website also quoted retired Gen Wesley Clark, one of Mr Kerry's rivals for the nomination, as having told journalists off the record: "Kerry will implode over an intern issue."

Mr Clark later dropped out of the race and endorsed Mr Kerry.

Miss Polier, a journalist who once worked for Associated Press, apparently met the senator as she was beginning her media career.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The latest

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004072203,00.html

John Kerry girl tells all



Affair ... Alex Polier




From BRIAN FLYNN
in New York

THE beauty said to have had a fling with presidential hopeful John Kerry has recorded a bombshell tell-all interview.

Journalist Alex Polier taped a talk with a US TV network at Christmas.

The former Washington intern, 27, told all about an alleged fling with the 60-year-old super-rich senator in spring 2001.


Hopeful ... John Kerry

The channel is sitting on the tape until it has enough evidence to back her story. If the sex claims are true, they would shatter his White House hopes. Kerry, a married dad of two, has denied the fling. But Alex told pals she fled to Kenya on his suggestion.

One TV source said: “She wants to tell her story. She has talked at length about her relationship with Kerry. But no one is believing her.”

Kerry was front-runner for the Democratic nomination to take on George Bush in November. His hopes were hit as hints of a scandal emerged.

and:
http://www.nationaudio.com/News/DailyNation/Today/News/mainNews1602200453.html

Kerry intern hiding in Kenya
By NATION Reporter
and Agencies
The young intern at the centre of a furore involving United States presidential hopeful John Kerry is hiding out in Kenya.

Alex Polier, 24, has been in the country for the past few weeks visiting her fiancee, Mr Yaron Schwartzman, who works with FilmStudios, along Nairobi's Ngong Road.

Ms Polier, who could end Senator John Kerry's hopes of becoming the next president of the United States, is alleged to have had a two-year affair with the front-runner for the Democratic nomination.

"This is not going to go away," one American friend of Ms Polier said yesterday. "What actually happened is much nastier than is being reported."

The allegations come at a crucial time for the senator. Polls showed him leading Mr Bush by 52 per cent to 42 per cent, and aides will be anxious to see if the apparent scandal affects his standing among voters.

Ms Polier, a former intern who also spent some time in 1998 doing work experience at the Houses of Parliament in London, is in Kenya staying with Mr Schwartzman.

It was not immediately clear what Mr Schwartzman does at FilmStudios. Efforts to contact the family home in the leafy suburb of Lavington were fruitless.

Miss Polier and her fiance were believed to be hiding at the Nairobi home of Mr Schwartzman's parents, who moved to Kenya from Israel.

Mr Joseph Schwartzman is the chairman of the H Young group of companies. His wife, Hannah, is described by friends to be a devout Jew who was hoping to see her future daughter-in-law convert to Judaism before the wedding ceremony planned for some time later in the year.

The Nation has established, however, that the couple were students together at Columbia University in New York.

Both have refused to make any comment on her alleged links with Senator Kerry, who is married to Teresa Heinz Kerry, heiress to a food empire.

Senator Kerry, a decorated Vietnam veteran dubbed the new JFK, has vehemently denied any relationship with Miss Polier and shrugged off allegations that he had a two-year affair with her from 2001. He said: "I just deny it categorically. It's rumour. It's untrue. Period."

Mr Kerry flatly denied swirling rumours about an extramarital affair, assuring backers that his campaign was not vulnerable to a sudden sex scandal.

Mr Kerry, married once before, was something of a playboy after his divorce, dating starlets Morgan Fairchild and Catherine Oxenberg.

Mrs Heinz-Kerry, who has been a fixture on the campaign trail, is no shrinking violet. She once told a writer for Elle magazine that she would jokingly warn her first husband that if he ever strayed, "I'll maim you. Not kill you, just maim you."

Mr Kerry, 60, has won 12 out of the 14 Democratic primaries and has looked all but certain to seal the nomination to take on President George W. Bush in November's elections.

His aides have blamed a dirty tricks campaign for bringing the allegations about Miss Polier into the public eye; they first surfaced last week on a right-wing internet site, the Drudge Report, which famously first broke the news of Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky.

Ms Polier's parents, Terry and Donna, from Malvern, Pennsylvania, added fuel to the fire by claiming that Mr Kerry did pursue their daughter.

Said Mr Polier: "I think he's a sleazeball. I did wonder if she didn't get that feeling herself. He's not the sort of guy I'd choose to be with my daughter. John Kerry called my daughter and invited her to be on his re-election committee. She talked to him and decided against it."

The Drudge website also quoted retired Gen Wesley Clark, one of Mr Kerry's rivals for the nomination, as having told journalists off the record: "Kerry will implode over an intern issue."

Mr Clark later dropped out of the race and endorsed Mr Kerry.

Miss Polier, a journalist who once worked for Associated Press, apparently met the senator as she was beginning her media career.




The discussion I saw on Fox News today pegged your story as an outright lie to discredit Kerry and indicated the Druge report was nothing more than speculation.
The whole point being to put some pressure on Kerry and see if maybe he'll fold up.

But just for fun lets assume its true, DILLIGAF.

:D


blue skies

Jerry




Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Isn't that horse dead YET!!!!


Yes. however, it seems the esteemed prof is beating it, despite it's putrescence, and various crime scene analysts' drooling all over the forensic evidence of a dead equine.

Ah well....

Does anyone know anything about the following (and if you have links, that'd be good):
~Kerry's early dismissal from the service?
~Kerry's position on terrorism?
~Kerry's committee affiliations?
~Kerry's affiliation with Skull and Bones?

Just curious.

Ciels-
Michele



Instead of making "clever" remarks, how about giving one of your customary logical responses:

A president makes a statement to the nation that the federal budget deficit will be small and short-term.

That president then sends to Congress a proposal for a significant reduction in federal tax revenues (which Congress passes). At the same time he greatly increases the size of the federal bureaucracy and proposes budgets with greatly increased spending to pay for all that stuff (which Congress also passes).

Do you not consider that this president then has primary responsibility if the outcome of his actions is an increase in the federal deficit to record levels into the forseeable future?

And was not his initial statement (small, short-lived...) deliberately misleading in the light of his subsequent actions?





Hey Michele - still waiting for your answer. I know you're out there.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Further, unless we were in his place and had gone through his experiences, who the fuck are we to question it?



Paul,
I was in his place and I went through his experiences. He is a dirt bag and I put him in the same category at Hanoi Jane.
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Back on topic here. Why isn't the press all over this? I remenber when George H. Bush was accused with even flimsier evidence od having an extra-marital affair back in 1992. The media was all over it. Joe Conason even wrote an article for Spy Magazine entitled "1000 Reasons Not to Vote for George H. Bush" number 1 on the list was "He cheats on his wife"

Newt Gingrich, Bob Livingstone etc. seems as if anytime it's a Republican, the media is all over it, but very little with Kerry. Nope, no media bias here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, they were talking about it on "Reliable Sources" yesterday and said the reason they haven't been talking about it (it actually has been in a few media outlets) is that to this point it's completely unsubstantiated. And it may have been a dream but I could have sworn I heard somewhere last night that it had been found to be a complete and total sham.

Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Actually, they were talking about it on "Reliable Sources" yesterday and said the reason they haven't been talking about it (it actually has been in a few media outlets) is that to this point it's completely unsubstantiated. And it may have been a dream but I could have sworn I heard somewhere last night that it had been found to be a complete and total sham.



You may have missed my point. The allegations against GHB were totally bogus, but that didn't stop the media from jumping all over it. Different standard when it's a Republican isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Actually, they were talking about it on "Reliable Sources" yesterday and said the reason they haven't been talking about it (it actually has been in a few media outlets) is that to this point it's completely unsubstantiated. And it may have been a dream but I could have sworn I heard somewhere last night that it had been found to be a complete and total sham.



You may have missed my point. The allegations against GHB were totally bogus, but that didn't stop the media from jumping all over it. Different standard when it's a Republican isn't it?



GHWB was President of the USA at the time. Kerry is still just a Senator.

IIRC, the press was all over Clinton when he was President of the USA.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I suspect they made a calculated risk based on sketchy and conflicting intelligence and the strong desire that it be true 'cos they were itching for a fight, dismissed the conflicting part when they made the case to Congress, and were caught out when their version turned out to be bogus



Again they didn't lie...they might have made a mistake.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0