dreamdancer
Members-
Content
4,572 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by dreamdancer
-
Wall Street protesters to occupy foreclosed homes
dreamdancer replied to dreamdancer's topic in Speakers Corner
Good for Oakland! You bet! That's where those germs belong! Chuck your dehumanisation of people is disturbing. along with your fascination with 'hispanic' gangs. reveals a lot... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding -
Wall Street protesters to occupy foreclosed homes
dreamdancer replied to dreamdancer's topic in Speakers Corner
Good for Oakland! that's just one. thousands more are being lined up for occupation... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding -
hey, let's not bother with the moon or mars - let's go straight to the nearest star at lightspeed - the same stupid thing you say every time. keep it up. you've got lots of company to make you feel good... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
makes sense - people aren't machines... http://www.alternet.org/economy/153620/san_francisco_becomes_first_in_nation_with_%2410_minimum_wage_%28and_the_sky_isn%27t_going_to_fall%29/ stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
Let Your Life Be a Counter-Friction to Stop the Machine
dreamdancer replied to dreamdancer's topic in Speakers Corner
science fiction or not... http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/12/30-3 stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding -
It's pretty simple, and obvious to anyone that's had a job with on call responsibilities. When a medic is on call, he or she does not get drunk. A drunk medic is not the savior you think. Same applies to me - I get paid for this time on call and it would be unprofessional to be in a state where I could cost the company millions. And spies on call to find bombs? You watch 24 a lot? Let's get back to the real world, where drunk driving kills tens of thousands of Americans each year. If the spy is that important, he can take a taxi. he can take a taxi - but lose valuable, critical time (ooops i'm into 24 hours land) that bomb goes off... hey, what about my churchill example - should he have been removed from office? Lemme ask you this. I want a straight answer. No beating around the bush, no hedging, just a straight-up honest answer. You up for it? Here goes... Would you honestly want a drunk EMT or doctor working on you if, you were in a wreck? Chuck i'd rather have a drunk one (and there are varying degrees of drunkenness) helping me than no-one at all... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
It's pretty simple, and obvious to anyone that's had a job with on call responsibilities. When a medic is on call, he or she does not get drunk. A drunk medic is not the savior you think. Same applies to me - I get paid for this time on call and it would be unprofessional to be in a state where I could cost the company millions. And spies on call to find bombs? You watch 24 a lot? Let's get back to the real world, where drunk driving kills tens of thousands of Americans each year. If the spy is that important, he can take a taxi. he can take a taxi - but lose valuable, critical time (ooops i'm into 24 hours land) that bomb goes off... hey, what about my churchill example - should he have been removed from office? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
drunk driving isn't defensible - except under 'not normal' conditions. then a judgement call has to be made. for instance this guy should/should not have been allowed to conduct a war... http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2010/sep/02/prime-ministers-and-alcohol stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
he'd had one drink (so not 'drunk') and was quite capable of finding the bomb. however the police sticking to the absolute letter of the law arrested him... As this "what if" game is all fantasy, billvon's fantasy example - not mine... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
and now if the guy/gal is a medic/intelligence officer who has been called to an emergency where dozens are about to lose their lives - do the police arrest the 'drunk' or escort them to the scene of the emergency... horses for courses... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
first they beat our own dictator - saddam. and now they've beaten the us in iraq... It must be a fascinating fantasy world you live in. Someday a shrink or fiction author may ask you about it. Here in the real world, back in 1987 and 1988 Iran used mines and tried to block the strait during the Iran-Iraq war. The US military destroyed all opposing forces that didn't turn tail and run, and then forced a cease-fire between Iran and Iraq. Operation Praying Mantis Do you really think anything present day Iran uses to block the strait wouldn't be destroyed by the fifth fleet? Russia doesn't think so - Russian military official: Iranian Navy no match for US battle group we armed saddam so he was our dictator. he attacked iran for us - and lost. iran now have the upper hand in iraq... You saying it doesn't make it so. Back up your claims with sources. Hell, anyone can say you moved to Thailand to do things that we're banned from joking/talking about on dz.com. Unless they have a source, it's all just hot air and make-believe, isn't it? We armed Saddam? We armed half the freaking world, if not more. Does that mean everyone out there is "our boy"? I wouldn't say so. And if Saddam was so much our boy that he attacked Iran for us, then why the hell did he attack Kuwait and force the US military to attack to remove his army? See Desert Storm. What makes you say Iran now has the upper hand in Iraq? he attacked kuwait because he'd lost the war with iran and thought he'd get kuwait as a consolation prize. iran has the upper hand in iraq as the us got rid of their enemies there... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
we armed saddam so he was our dictator. he attacked iran for us - and lost. iran now have the upper hand in iraq... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
Sure the US can afford it. BHO has just proposed raising the debt limit another $1.2 Trillion. The battle-field is already set. Look at a map. US in Iraq. US in Afghanistan. US fleet in the Gulf. Remember the last time the Iranians mined the straits? It was the excuse Reagan was itching for. This has been coming for awhile. No big news flash here. The recent explosions in Iran are too precise to be simple accidents. i don't know whether china will lend the us enough for another war when that war will also cut off china's own oil supply... The Chinese ain't stupid. They just might join in, like they did in the Sudan. so the us plans depend upon china co-operating... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
first they beat our own dictator - saddam. and now they've beaten the us in iraq... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
So if you were a citizen in North Korea, you wouldn't want someone to depose your leader so that you and all of your countrymen could live in freedom and prosperity like the rest of the world? That wasn't his proposition. He's talking about "from the outside looking in"; while you're asking him about "from the inside looking out". Two very different things. i don't think he can do 'outside looking in'... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
-
another turn of the key... http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/12/29 stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding