uberalles

Members
  • Content

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Community Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Hello poster 18C....... Welcome to the Forum :) uberalles
  2. Aren't you talking about the Reno letter that was sent to the Reno News just days after the Hijacking ?
  3. The Letter to a newpaper with the CODE was not the one you mentioned above. It was the one with the CODE in it which said if you can decipher the Code then you can find me. Perhaps it was not the Reno paper, but I have the notes and my communications and records of my phone call to a man with the California newspaper that received it. Interesting that this article has not been mentioned in so far as the one publicized by this thread and by Galen Cook. Hi Jo, do you have any more info, leads, anything on hidden messages/codes in the letter you are talking about?
  4. On page 118 of Robert Blevin's Book there is a side view of Christiansen. Pretty much the exact angle Mitchell would have been looking at .. for those three hours he was not getting the girl This pic is from just a few years before Norjack BTW What is his call on Christiansen??
  5. I am wondering how many have now listened to the Mitchell interview.. (not just read the transcript) but actually listening to the wav file where you hear Mitchell in his own words http://collections.washingtonhistory.org/details.aspx?id=122559 Wouldn't it make sense that he has already made a call on everyone that has been called out (here there and everywhere as a possible suspect) ?? What if the FBI has done everything right ? What if the answer Mitchell gave was...... NONE OF THE ABOVE ??? could it be? Wouldn't that explain why the bureau is not interested in entertaining 'evidence' on ANY suspect it knows already is not Cooper ? See you guys at Ariel. Mark, Uncle Brucie, anyone else from Cooperland. I will make sure I have my name tag on
  6. pretty much lays it out about the DNA.....
  7. Mitchell's description is spot on, If he says no on a suspect, that suspect gets excluded. Vicky, I would say your missing Dad is not out of the running yet? Cooper wasn't trying to look good, he was wearing a disguise
  8. Doesn't E. Vicki's dad have that chin characteristic? Why not show Mitchell a lineup of photos? Round up the usual suspects. 377 I would highly suspect he has already seen and made a call on any and all persons of interest If it turns out Mitchell says NO on all the favorites... you know what that means.. Can we all please dispel our personal feelings and just listen to what Mitchell says ?? he is putting us on the plane right next to Cooper He is used to getting attention from cute girls (not on this three hour flight ) Hell yes he is focused on Coopers appearance and we should be too
  9. Here is the link to the Mitchell interview http://collections.washingtonhistory.org/details.aspx?id=122559 Cooper was indeed a scrawny, white turkey neck, fake looking hair, geeky, suit wrinkled, intimidated by Mitchell, RAGBAG Mitchell gives every detail of his experience w/ the bureau post touchdown...
  10. Looking forward to Ariel Meanwhile....what is Mitchells take on all the other favorites ??
  11. Have no idea who this witness was. Mitchell was too young for Tina and the other man who got a decent look at Cooper - was unknown to me. Strange I have never heard the expression of ragbag stated regarding Cooper. Did you get that from the records made available recently of just an opinion? I cannot download the records recently made available - just have dial-up. Due to all of the recent silence on the part of the FBI and others - it makes one wonder what the Hell is going on! Hi Jo, I talked to the Woman at the museum. she was the tour guide and set up some of the exhibits. She was talking about the witness across the aisle from Cooper. She expressed specifically to me that this witness (a young man) was jealous because the FA was paying so much attention to Cooper. This same witness said everything about Cooper was cheap wrinkled messy Ragbag: Wrinkled messy disheveled like maybe his clothes were in a paper bag and he changed into them at the airport ??
  12. Hi Jo, you are saying he did not give Cooper much notice, but apparently he told the museum he was definitely looking Cooper over. What about his response to the other suspects pictures... of course he has looked ??
  13. AND...... we are still not allowed to know where the plane actually was The bureau took the entire seat assy to DC for hair fiber fingerprint analysis... I am betting they have hair samples that belong to Cooper and have yet to see a match to any of the favorite suspects When I went to the museum in Tacoma, the young lady giving the tour talked about a male passenger who sat across the aisle from Cooper & Tina, he remembers wondering why is she sitting with him ?? He was jealous, no doubt felt he was a much more attractive guy Guys, think about it... this would make him a great witness right?? He says Cooper was a complete ragbag. Maybe spent 20 minutes staring at Coopers side view profile ..... Tina is not talking, but I bet this guy will......
  14. I did the last three Ariels. After the last one, I decided I had enough of it for a while. It's almost three hours each way from my house, you know. I started taking a look at where I was spending time, and priorities. I determined it was Cooper-Heavy. I'm happier now than I have been in quite a while. Cooper has become not completely boring to me, but it's definitely taken a back seat to other, more interesting things. You only WISH you had my life, baby. I'm not sure how Revenge Story will do at Amazon. Forget Cooper. He's getting to be a bore. And I'm starting to believe the case will never be solved anyway. Maybe that's how it was supposed to end all along... I guess the real truth is this: Since most of the work I did on the case concerned Kenny, if it turns out he wasn't the guy, then I guess I don't care that much. Probably turn out to be someone no one's ever heard of before anyway. Really ??? You are not going to be there w/ all the posting you have done? what are you doing here ? Is that even a question.. Just the latest in a very long string of things that just don't add up about this case. Look forward to meeting folks at Ariel who are actually interested in separating the facts from the fabrications. uberalles
  15. Reply: Galen was banned, apparently permanently, in December 2008 under very unusual circumstances. One day in December 2008, he asked Ckret if he was posting on the DZ during company time. I remember reading the post when it first appeared and I thought it a legitimate question, since Larry was posting many times a day, morning, noon and night, even 4 am. The next thing that happened, Galen received an email from Quade saying that he was being invited to take a permanent vacation from the DZ. I consider it quite unfair, and places Quade's credibility into question. At the time, I thought he had acted improperly in protecting Larry's reputation and position in the office at the Seattle FO. Later, I became more circumspect as I learned Quade was not a big supporter of Ckret. Further strangeness occurred soon after when Qaude banned Snowmman. Granted, Snowmman is often rude, crude and thoroughly obnoxious. But he is damn smart and brings a ton to the Norjak table. As a result, converations here are somewhat truncated, and certainly less robust than they had once been. As for you, Robert, I still don't see any apology from you on behalf of Kenny, acknowledging his responsibility for threatening to kill 42 people on Novemebr 24, 1971. By the way, Robert, you are often rude and nasty on the DZ. Why is that? You seem to bait people with insults. It's like you're on a fishing trip for a reaction. What's that all about? Also, I agree that calling Tina under false pretenses is not a lofty or proper act. Yet, the result does show the true nature of Jo and Tina. Thanks 'Uncle Brucie' !!