0
ibx

Feds Spend $2.2 Million To Study “Why Lesbians Are Obese”

Recommended Posts

Gravitymaster



Quote

Paying $2.2M to possibly get a benefit in the $Billions is a good deal for everyone. Only someone with a pathological hatred for those different from themselves would think otherwise.



Please point out where you find this "good deal" in the Constitution.



We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You should try reading it, you might find it educational.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gravitymaster

******Being a wealthy Professor, why don't you just pay for the seat next to you? Why do you have to rely on the government to make you more comfortable?



What part of "government of the people by the people for the people" is it that you can't comprehend?

Only a narcissistic boob would think the government should force its citizens to lose weight so that person would be more comfortable on an airplane.

1. I made no mention of force. Try reading instead of reflexively hitting "post".

2. Only an idiot with an agenda would take a secondary comment to attack while snipping and ignoring the main point.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

1. I made no mention of force. Try reading instead of reflexively hitting "post".



And yet, the threat of force provides the weight behind any government action--by the people, for the people, or not.
Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful.
-Calvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***

Quote

Paying $2.2M to possibly get a benefit in the $Billions is a good deal for everyone. Only someone with a pathological hatred for those different from themselves would think otherwise.



Please point out where you find this "good deal" in the Constitution.



We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You should try reading it, you might find it educational.

I think anyone who interprets that to justify a weird type of narcissistic socialism would be well advised to re-evaluate their education.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lefty

***1. I made no mention of force. Try reading instead of reflexively hitting "post".



And yet, the threat of force provides the weight behind any government action--by the people, for the people, or not.

I doubt that would be understandable to the narcissist's as their can only think of how government can serve them and make their lives more "comfortable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lefty

***1. I made no mention of force. Try reading instead of reflexively hitting "post".



And yet, the threat of force provides the weight behind any government action--by the people, for the people, or not.

There was NO threat of force, implicit or explicit, in the funding for the research mentioned in the OP.

You are as bad as Gravitymaster - leaping to unfounded conclusions without actually reading what was written.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gravitymaster

******

Quote

Paying $2.2M to possibly get a benefit in the $Billions is a good deal for everyone. Only someone with a pathological hatred for those different from themselves would think otherwise.



Please point out where you find this "good deal" in the Constitution.



We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You should try reading it, you might find it educational.

I think anyone who interprets that to justify a weird type of narcissistic socialism would be well advised to re-evaluate their education.

Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

*********

Quote

Paying $2.2M to possibly get a benefit in the $Billions is a good deal for everyone. Only someone with a pathological hatred for those different from themselves would think otherwise.



Please point out where you find this "good deal" in the Constitution.



We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You should try reading it, you might find it educational.

I think anyone who interprets that to justify a weird type of narcissistic socialism would be well advised to re-evaluate their education.

Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".

I realize it's become difficult for you to remember what you have said but if you go back a little, you will remember that we were discussing your support for this study so you didn't have to sit next to a fat lesbian on a plane. Does that help jog your memory a little or should I quote you word for word?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend



Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".



Never heard of personal responsibility, huh?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gravitymaster

************

Quote

Paying $2.2M to possibly get a benefit in the $Billions is a good deal for everyone. Only someone with a pathological hatred for those different from themselves would think otherwise.



Please point out where you find this "good deal" in the Constitution.



We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You should try reading it, you might find it educational.

I think anyone who interprets that to justify a weird type of narcissistic socialism would be well advised to re-evaluate their education.

Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".

I realize it's become difficult for you to remember what you have said but if you go back a little, you will remember that we were discussing your support for this study so you didn't have to sit next to a fat lesbian on a plane. Does that help jog your memory a little or should I quote you word for word?

You really are desperate when you snip the main point of a post and cling like a limpet to an aside.

Must be sad to be like that.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
turtlespeed

***

Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".



Never heard of personal responsibility, huh?

Never read the preamble to the Constitution, huh?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***************

Quote

Paying $2.2M to possibly get a benefit in the $Billions is a good deal for everyone. Only someone with a pathological hatred for those different from themselves would think otherwise.



Please point out where you find this "good deal" in the Constitution.



We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You should try reading it, you might find it educational.

I think anyone who interprets that to justify a weird type of narcissistic socialism would be well advised to re-evaluate their education.

Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".

I realize it's become difficult for you to remember what you have said but if you go back a little, you will remember that we were discussing your support for this study so you didn't have to sit next to a fat lesbian on a plane. Does that help jog your memory a little or should I quote you word for word?

You really are desperate when you snip the main point of a post and cling like a limpet to an aside.

Must be sad to be like that.

Nope, you are really desperate when you make stupid narcissistic comments and then try and deflect from what everyone knows you said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

******

Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".



Never heard of personal responsibility, huh?

Never read the preamble to the Constitution, huh?

Yes, did you have trouble understanding it?

I can help if you like.:)
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
turtlespeed

*********

Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".



Never heard of personal responsibility, huh?

Never read the preamble to the Constitution, huh?

Yes, did you have trouble understanding it?

I can help if you like.:)
I seriously doubt that you would ever help anyone, being a GOP supporter.

www.chron.com/news/us/article/10-Things-Making-sense-of-nation-s-bad-bridges-4817270.php

I expect you and your ilk don't need bridges, what with being so personally responsible. Surely you make your own and the Hell with anyone else.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

************

Kindly explain how funding research to improve the health of a significant number of women is "narcissistic socialism".



Never heard of personal responsibility, huh?

Never read the preamble to the Constitution, huh?

Yes, did you have trouble understanding it?

I can help if you like.:)
I seriously doubt that you would ever help anyone, being a GOP supporter.

www.chron.com/news/us/article/10-Things-Making-sense-of-nation-s-bad-bridges-4817270.php

I expect you and your ilk don't need bridges, what with being so personally responsible. Surely you make your own and the Hell with anyone else.

I can see you point here, because the local government builds and maintains all the lesbians that I drive over every day. That is why they did a survey for their obesity.

Do you have anything more relevant to personal responsibility, or are you just here for comic relief?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I bet you are self-educated too. No teachers for you - that would be denial of personal responsibility.

And you only drive on your own private roads.

And I bet you've never taken a single medication developed using federal research funds. Or watched a weather forecast that made use of NWS/NOAA data.

Yep, that would be the GOP way.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend


I bet you are self-educated too. No teachers for you - that would be denial of personal responsibility.

And you only drive on your own private roads.

And I bet you've never taken a single medication developed using federal research funds. Or watched a weather forecast that made use of NWS/NOAA data.

Yep, that would be the GOP way.



I was educated privately.

Roads are there. I take toll roads as often as I can, so I can get off the government owned roads.

The forecast is there, but I subscribe to the sites that pay their way.

I never took the time to research who developed, and with what money, what scripts I use.

Next useless argument?

Can you tell me that this study had anything to do with children, if so, then maybe you have a point.

Or are you now claiming that the fed has its finger in EVERY higher education establishment?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
turtlespeed

***
I bet you are self-educated too. No teachers for you - that would be denial of personal responsibility.

And you only drive on your own private roads.

And I bet you've never taken a single medication developed using federal research funds. Or watched a weather forecast that made use of NWS/NOAA data.

Yep, that would be the GOP way.



I was educated privately.



No teachers then. That wouldn't be doing it yourself.

Quote



Roads are there. I take toll roads as often as I can, so I can get off the government owned roads.



Sure!:S I bet you go out of your way to take toll bridges too.

Quote


The forecast is there, but I subscribe to the sites that pay their way.



Ha ha - all the weather sites use data from the NWS.:P

I bet you even do your own air traffic control when you fly, and you've never visited a National or State Park.

You are just as much a moocher as anyone else, but living in self-righteous denial.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

******
I bet you are self-educated too. No teachers for you - that would be denial of personal responsibility.

And you only drive on your own private roads.

And I bet you've never taken a single medication developed using federal research funds. Or watched a weather forecast that made use of NWS/NOAA data.

Yep, that would be the GOP way.



I was educated privately.



No teachers then. That wouldn't be doing it yourself.

Quote



Roads are there. I take toll roads as often as I can, so I can get off the government owned roads.



>>>Sure!:S I bet you go out of your way to take toll bridges too.

I would do what ever I could to get off the government tit. Can you say the same?

Quote


The forecast is there, but I subscribe to the sites that pay their way.



>>>Ha ha - all the weather sites use data from the NWS.:P
Which One do you subscribe to, or do you take it all for free?

>>>I bet you even do your own air traffic control when you fly, and you've >>>never visited a National or State Park.
Of course not, don't be ridiculous.
Oh, wait, I forgot the source.:S


You are just as much a moocher as anyone else, but living in self-righteous denial.

Your statement is false.
You just go on living in your imaginary world.

Let me know when you stop being more of a moocher as most.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
turtlespeed



Let me know when you stop being more of a moocher as most.



Fail.

I pay more towards running the government than most. In fact, based on IRS data, more than about 95% of Americans and some six times the national average.:P

And I approve my tax dollars going to research on obesity.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***

Let me know when you stop being more of a moocher as most.



Fail.

I pay more towards running the government than most. In fact, based on IRS data, more than about 95% of Americans and some six times the national average.:P

And I approve my tax dollars going to research on obesity.

Let me know when you have a choice in the matter.:)
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
turtlespeed

******

Let me know when you stop being more of a moocher as most.



Fail.

I pay more towards running the government than most. In fact, based on IRS data, more than about 95% of Americans and some six times the national average.:P

And I approve my tax dollars going to research on obesity.

Let me know when you have a choice in the matter.:)
Implicitly acknowledging your FAIL, I see, without the courtesy of actually admitting it.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

*********

Let me know when you stop being more of a moocher as most.



Fail.

I pay more towards running the government than most. In fact, based on IRS data, more than about 95% of Americans and some six times the national average.:P

And I approve my tax dollars going to research on obesity.

Let me know when you have a choice in the matter.:)
Implicitly acknowledging your FAIL, I see, without the courtesy of actually admitting it.

I have no proof, but as much as you are over paid, I can assume that you could be right and gave you the benefit of the doubt.:P
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***

Let me know when you stop being more of a moocher as most.



Fail.

I pay more towards running the government than most. In fact, based on IRS data, more than about 95% of Americans and some six times the national average.:P

And I approve my tax dollars going to research on obesity.

I call Bullshit. More than 95% of Americans? Your last name isn't Rockefeller :|...

You do have the detached demeanor of someone who was handed too much in life, though. If Life hadn't handed you so much. You'd be a lot more particular in how the Government pisses it all away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0