billvon 2,435 #151 April 20, 2011 >11 Reasons We'd be Better Off with No Government at All All true! But there are like 30 reasons you'd be better off dead. No more waiting through commercial breaks! No more traffic! No more people cutting in front of you in line! No more stale pretzels and watery beer! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimbrown 0 #152 April 20, 2011 [reply Kennedy, would you read the bottom of page 22 and the top of page 23 and then come back and tell us about Federal judges and the income tax? OK, so you found one exerpt from one case not related to tax law. Considering your posts in this thread, I think it would be inappropriate for you claim judges are always correct, don't you? In this case, the judge was wrong. Quote No Kennedy, please just tell us all what that feral judge said and exactly what he said regarding the 16th amendment and how other courts would work with that same knowledge. Please be absolutely truthful as your credibility is relying on it! Besides , I AM(Jim B) WHO AM (Jim B) is watching!! You won't get away with any bullshit! Peace, Jim B. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #153 April 20, 2011 Like I give a fuck what you think about me or my credibility? Not bloody likely! You're the one who thinks courts can't hear criminal cases or cases where any part of the government is a party. I'm not in the habit of quoting judges who are wrong about one topic while ruling correctly on the issue at hand. If you want to quote him, that's your issue, and you'll look even more ridiculous than you already do (and that's saying something). The judge was wrong. If you want to know what the federal judiciary has said about the 16th amendment, look up ruling related to said amendment, not a pretrial motion to dismiss a request for injunction concerning the war powers act.witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #154 April 20, 2011 QuoteThe judge was wrong. Ding. End of discussion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,150 #155 April 20, 2011 QuoteDing. End of discussionHuh? Was the judge Hitler? Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #156 April 20, 2011 QuoteQuoteDing. End of discussionHuh? Was the judge Hitler? No; nor even Godwin. Just wrong. Kennedy already typed out the long version of how/why (either in this thread or the other silly one). Now then: Papers, please. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimbrown 0 #157 April 20, 2011 Quote Like I give a fuck what you think about me or my credibility? Not bloody likely! You're the one who thinks courts can't hear criminal cases or cases where any part of the government is a party. I'm not in the habit of quoting judges who are wrong about one topic while ruling correctly on the issue at hand. If you want to quote him, that's your issue, and you'll look even more ridiculous than you already do (and that's saying something). The judge was wrong. If you want to know what the federal judiciary has said about the 16th amendment, look up ruling related to said amendment, not a pretrial motion to dismiss a request for injunction concerning the war powers act. See here young man, (doesn't that opening give me an air of superiority and athourity? ) You say the judge was wrong. That may be true. Thing is he pretty much aknowledged the point I've been making. When it comes to income tax no federal judge is going to give a defendant a fair shake. That's a federal judge on the bench talking candidly. And still you believe that in tax matters the defendant can get a fair trial? Peace, Jim B. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimbrown 0 #158 April 20, 2011 QuoteQuoteThe judge was wrong. Ding. End of discussion. I think this discussion should continue. Andy, the judge in the Sullivan case candidly admitted that there was no evidence that the 16th amendment was properly ratified. Strike that , he stated that there was ample evidence that the 16th amendment was never properly ratified !!! He goes on to make the point that even if that amendment was never legaly added to the Constitution, no federal court would ever rule that the income tax provision is anything other than law! What say you? If the 16th amendment was not properly ratified , is it law? Peace, Jim B. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,150 #159 April 20, 2011 You and the wrong judge agree. See a pattern? Can we talk about the 45 degree rule for exit separation? Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimbrown 0 #160 April 20, 2011 QuoteYou and the wrong judge agree. See a pattern?Quote I do. I see that you have made up your mind and if a federal judge attempts to enlighten you you just disregard what he says, he is wrong ,end of story. Yes ,Wendy, I do see a pattern! I see a pattern of those entrenched in their ignorance refusing to open themselves to the Truth. Peace, Jim B. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites hairyjuan 0 #161 April 20, 2011 Money is YOU "> we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively wishers never choose, choosers never wish Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,435 #162 April 20, 2011 >Can we talk about the 45 degree rule for exit separation? Why do you want to BAN SKYDIVING? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page 7 of 7 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
hairyjuan 0 #161 April 20, 2011 Money is YOU "> we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively wishers never choose, choosers never wish Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,435 #162 April 20, 2011 >Can we talk about the 45 degree rule for exit separation? Why do you want to BAN SKYDIVING? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
