Time for TV press to quit being used by Obama

[jerryzflies 0]

Quote

And you just mentioned funding issued by the government... a criterion i adhered to.

Do you know what a straw-man is.... man?

If you can't fix it with a hammer, the problem's electrical.

[peek 20]

OT: "makeithappen40", huh?

Perhaps since you have chosen a user name that is very choose to Jan Meyer's user name, that you might be kind enough to fill in more of your profile.

[penniless 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Y'know, I think it was wrong wrong wrong for Bush to have involved us in two wars. I mean, think of the cost!

We could easily be spending more money unnecessarily. Hell, what is the record for number of wars involved in within one term of presidency? Two? Maybe Obama can beat that record. Cmon nationalism, lets get this party started baby!

Obama's already taken us from a 400B deficit to almost 2T... how much more unnecessary spending do you want?

Unnecessary? Aren't you a conservative? War is always a justifiable means of spending money. Hell, under Bush we got to spend 500 billion dollars a year for 8 years on the national defense budget. That shit is totally ok when you can kill sand people! I bet Obama could easily make that 600 bil a year on Afghanistan alone. Whos with me?

The defense budget isn't discretionary spending - nice strawman, though.

First it was "hypocrite"
www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3594975;search_string=dictionary;#3594975

Now "strawman".

Please invest in a dictionary.

[rushmc 18]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Y'know, I think it was wrong wrong wrong for Bush to have involved us in two wars. I mean, think of the cost!

We could easily be spending more money unnecessarily. Hell, what is the record for number of wars involved in within one term of presidency? Two? Maybe Obama can beat that record. Cmon nationalism, lets get this party started baby!

Obama's already taken us from a 400B deficit to almost 2T... how much more unnecessary spending do you want?

Unnecessary? Aren't you a conservative? War is always a justifiable means of spending money. Hell, under Bush we got to spend 500 billion dollars a year for 8 years on the national defense budget. That shit is totally ok when you can kill sand people! I bet Obama could easily make that 600 bil a year on Afghanistan alone. Whos with me?

The defense budget isn't discretionary spending - nice strawman, though.

First it was "hypocrite"
www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3594975;search_string=dictionary;#3594975

Now "strawman".

Please invest in a dictionary.

neck hurt?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[makeithappen40 0]

Wow, I had no idea. (Honestly. It wasn't my intention to use another person's name.)

[peek 20]

Quote

Wow, I had no idea. (Honestly. It wasn't my intention to use another person's name.)

Sorry, I jumped the gun. You didn't really. Perhaps I was being overly suspicious, since we have seen people that have created user names very close to ones used by fairly well known posters. Carry on! (But filling out your profile is still a good idea.)

(I also thought Jan was the only person that would use that phrase.)

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

And you just mentioned funding issued by the government... a criterion i adhered to.

Do you know what a straw-man is.... man?

Perhaps you and penniless would care to explain how, since his post was the first mention of war or spending, how it is a criteria that *I* brought up.

And, since it IS misrepresenting my position (as I had not mentioned war or spending), yes, it IS a strawman.

Perhaps you, penniless and makeithappen40 (who STILL doesn't have the stones to mention who he was, before) need that dictionary more than I do.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[makeithappen40 0]

Jan...

I looked up that name on the forums here... is there some animosity going on over this person?