0
Richards

Teachers stage fake gunman attack on sixth graders

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Yeah, whatever.



It's hard to respond to an intelligent rebuttal like that. :P


It was as intelligent as suggesting 'duck and cover' is a viable way to save kids in a nuclear war.

So I guess we're even.


Well, I cited actual tests and studies which suggest "duck and cover" is useful, and you responded with, "Yeah, whatever," so I'm pretty sure that actually puts me a few points ahead. B|
I don't have an M.D. or a law degree. I have bachelor's in kicking ass and taking names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Well, I cited actual tests and studies which suggest "duck and cover" is useful, B|



You did??? Where? Saying that there have been studies is not citing them.

--------------------------
Chuck Norris doesn't do push-ups, he pushes the Earth down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Well, I cited actual tests and studies which suggest "duck and cover" is useful, B|



You did??? Where? Saying that there have been studies is not citing them.


I cited the locations of the tests; that's a citation. If I link to a YouTube video of the tests, will that convince you they actually happened? We all know how hard it is for you to believe anything you can't verify via the Internet.

Here's a wild idea: If you really want to discuss the dangers of nuclear war and the history of American civil defense, why don't you do a little research (beyond typing in keywords on Wikipedia) so that you can offer an educated opinion on the subject?
I don't have an M.D. or a law degree. I have bachelor's in kicking ass and taking names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It was as intelligent as suggesting 'duck and cover' is a viable way to save kids in a nuclear war.



It's an embarassing waste of time to explain things to some people.



Point taken. One should argue with the ignorant but never with the stupid or the insane.
I don't have an M.D. or a law degree. I have bachelor's in kicking ass and taking names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>It was as intelligent as suggesting 'duck and cover' is a viable way
>to save kids in a nuclear war.

It's a good way to save SOME kids in a nuclear war.

This reminds me of the whuffo argument against wearing a helmet while skydiving. "If you hit the ground at 120mph, do you really think that helmet is going to save you? You'd have to be an idiot to think that a helmet will help you survive a skydiving accident. Look at all those idiots wearing them fancy helmets! Stupid skydivers."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Oh horseshit!!!! (old fart rant here) Back in the 50s in elementary school, we were subject to atomic bomb attack drills, some in which we were actually told that enemy bombers were already enroute to vaporize us. All the school staff acted like we were all about to die and the only chance we had was to "duck and cover". Yep, there was the expected "crying for mommy" stuff but it did make us aware of what could happen and what, if anything, we could do to protect ourselvs.

Guess what, we all lived over it.



Just because something was done when you were children does not mean it was OK. Even if you did come through.

I have no problems with addressing real world issues with children as they are more capable of hearing straight talk about the real world than many may acknowledge; but running into a classroom telling children that a madman was coming to shoot them epitomised lack of judgement. They could have discussed the issue with the children and gone through practise drills if they really felt this was neccessary.
My biggest handicap is that sometimes the hole in the front of my head operates a tad bit faster than the grey matter contained within.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Apparently, there was nothing 'educational' about it. It was a 'prank' intended to scare the students; an extention of telling ghost stories around the campfire at an outing to a local state park.



Hopefully those teachers are now earning their living by standing at an intersection with a bucket and squeagee.
My biggest handicap is that sometimes the hole in the front of my head operates a tad bit faster than the grey matter contained within.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I've been following this story on CNN and waiting for it to show up in SC. This has to be one of the most egregious lapses of judgment in the history of elementary education. I've made some bad judgment calls and pulled a few stupid pranks in my life, so I keep thinking that if I try hard enough I might be able to get into the mindset of a teacher or a group of teachers who think a staged school/camp shooting would make for a good joke, but I'm at a complete loss. Could these teachers really not see that this was crossing a line and going beyond a friendly "campfire prank?" This is the equivalent of shouting "fire" in a crowded theater. And not only did they cause an undue panic by playing on the very real fears of a bunch of twelve-year-old kids, they've created a potential "Boy Who Cried Wolf" scenario. Now there's a chance that not only the victims of this prank but other kids who hear about it might react to a warning about a real school/camp shooting by saying, "I'm not going to fall for that." I'm usually the first person to come to the defense of someone who finds himself or herself the target of a public outcry--I think most public outcries are born out of over-hyped triflings. But I strongly believe these teachers should be fired. According to the students, these teachers said, "We have a code red,"--apparently that school district's code for an armed intruder--and shouted, "This is not a drill!" I wonder how those same teachers and administrators would have reacted to a student who created a panic with a bogus threat.



That pretty much sums up my opinion.
My biggest handicap is that sometimes the hole in the front of my head operates a tad bit faster than the grey matter contained within.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>It was as intelligent as suggesting 'duck and cover' is a viable way
>to save kids in a nuclear war.

It's a good way to save SOME kids in a nuclear war.

This reminds me of the whuffo argument against wearing a helmet while skydiving. "If you hit the ground at 120mph, do you really think that helmet is going to save you? You'd have to be an idiot to think that a helmet will help you survive a skydiving accident. Look at all those idiots wearing them fancy helmets! Stupid skydivers."



Or those who complain about having to wear helmets on takeoff. "Why would you want to be conscious while you burn". :D:D Same might be said for "duck and cover".
The older I get the less I care who I piss off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for championing this argument. The lampooning of duck & cover advice has always annoyed me when taken seriously outside the realm of standup comedy. It takes less overpressure to blow out glass and shred you than it does to blow down a building and crush you and there are always degrees of damage and debris based on too many factors to count and so there are areas where you might have less of a chance of injury like under a desk.

One would hope this was pretty much self evident, but apparently not. I think these ideas take hold when it becomes politically/socially favorable to repeat them. They grow into myths that go unchallenged for a generation to the point where folks become shocked at any argument & get quite insistent despite the obvious.

Duck & cover.... better than nothing.... sometimes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't read all the replies to this, but I have to throw in my two cents.

It never ceases to amaze me how stupid some school administrators are! The teachers could be fired for insubordination if they didn't go along with some idiot administrator's ideas, so I doubt if it was the teacher's fault. Such a bizarre plan would have to be approved first by the principal or superintendant.

Many of these kids are not going to simply get over this. Many may suffer from Post Traumatic Stress years after. It would be easy to sue for a ton of money over this and win.

There are good school administrators out there, but there's also some real morons.

Let me illustrate another case in point. This past week, here in Montana, there was a woman principal who noticed some 7th grade boys in an area that was clearly off the school grounds. She immediately ran them all into her office, and proceeded to strip search each one of them, in her office. She even had them jump up and down, in their skivies, for her scrutiny.

If that wasn't crazy enough, she physically touched them in places while searching for contraband. All that was found was one wood tick.

Did I mention that their were also several windows in her office where other students and staff could look in while these 7th grade boys were jumping up and down in their underware.

I know this all sounds like fantasy, but I read all this recently in our newspaper, so their must be at least some truth to it. It's still under investigation and this principal was sent home for a while.

I'm almost ashamed to admit that I too work in a public school. Where do they get these idiots, who have a complete lack of common sense, and then make them the head cheese?[:/].....Steve1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0