warpedskydiver 0 #26 February 10, 2007 Get back in your trunk! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #27 February 10, 2007 You could look at it that way, that is a valid point. Do you think there is a difference between people saying what feel he deserves and people saying what they feel his sentence should be? (Assuming a guilty verdict, of course) This isn't a smart ass question, so please don't construe it as such. I feel there is a difference. Edit for spelling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narcimund 0 #28 February 10, 2007 QuoteDo you think there is a difference between people saying what feel he deserves and people saying what they feel his sentence should be? There probably is a difference, but I'd spell it out as the difference between dispassionately considering the matter and getting your blood up. Saying calmly (though perhaps with intense conviction) that a crime is horrible and requires a response to satisfy a specific societal goal is probably healthy. On the other hand, competing to graphically describe increasingly extreme sadism is probably feeding an unhealthy inner urge. While I don't dispute their basic point that people should be discouraged from doing bad things, I wouldn't want them as friends. They're almost scarier than the criminals. There's been a lot of the latter sort of threads here recently. edited to clarify a point First Class Citizen Twice Over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #29 February 10, 2007 QuoteQuoteDo you think there is a difference between people saying what feel he deserves and people saying what they feel his sentence should be? There probably is a difference, but I'd spell it out as the difference between dispassionately considering the matter and getting your blood up. Saying calmly (though perhaps with intense conviction) that a crime is horrible and requires a response to satisfy a specific societal goal is probably healthy. On the other hand, competing to graphically describe increasingly extreme sadism is probably feeding an unhealthy inner urge. While I don't dispute their basic point that people should be discouraged from doing bad things, I wouldn't want them as friends. They're almost scarier than the criminals. There's been a lot of the latter sort of threads here recently. edited to clarify a point Who says they would want you as a friend? Also isn't it nice that you sit in judgement of others? I bet you feel very superior to most anyone, it is a good thing you don't have any flaws at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willard 0 #30 February 11, 2007 QuoteQuoteDo you think there is a difference between people saying what feel he deserves and people saying what they feel his sentence should be? There probably is a difference, but I'd spell it out as the difference between dispassionately considering the matter and getting your blood up. Saying calmly (though perhaps with intense conviction) that a crime is horrible and requires a response to satisfy a specific societal goal is probably healthy. On the other hand, competing to graphically describe increasingly extreme sadism is probably feeding an unhealthy inner urge. While I don't dispute their basic point that people should be discouraged from doing bad things, I wouldn't want them as friends. They're almost scarier than the criminals. There's been a lot of the latter sort of threads here recently. edited to clarify a point If I understand your post correctly then I agree with you. Stating what you feel the punishment should be is one thing, but to get involved in a game of one-upmanship to see who can devise the worst execution is not healthy. I will have to admit that I contributed to that on occasion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites