KennyS1134

Hey guys and gals, I'm pretty new to the photography aspect of skydiving, and can't seem to get stable video I have a Rawa vision, with a sidemounted Cx150, in a cookie cage with an opteka .3x 37mm lens, and a top mounted T2i with the kit lens. I sent back a medium size because it was waaay too tiny, and got a Large. It fits really snug. I can wiggle my head and get a tiny bit of movement. I've put more padding in to counter this and it did not show any difference in flight. Even before I added the still camera, the video was noticeable shaky. I know I'm not just zoning out and letting my head bobble around in the wind. I really focus on good technique. At first I thought the camera was just loose in the box, so I put insulation in the spaces, which didn't help at all. Now that I'm jumping a still, the shakiness has intensified, which I knew would happen...just not this much. My settings are as follow: Focus=manual, wide angle lens setting on, steadyshot off. Am I missing something (I hope so)? I know there are plenty of jumpers with similar top/side mounted cameras that get really stable video....so it's frustrating when I have good still shots, and centered video....but shaky video.

Dear Photography Gods, I have a Canon T2i with kit lens (lame I know), and was wondering what modes/settings would be the best choice for some super badass (and probably out of frame) skydiving shots. I have been playing around with it for 15mins, and so far the camera has defeated me. Once I regain my strength I'll try and tackle it again! I did a lot of research, in order to decide which camera best fit my needs, but now that I have one, the task of learning this discipline seems pretty daunting. I mean, there are soooo many different settings and modes. I've always admired skydiving photographers, but now I have an entirely new appreciation for all the work (and money) they pour into this discipline. Any advice or guidance would be greatly appreciated. Cheers!

Ive read statements that USPA will announce updates/changes on their website soon. Seems like you need to learn and be a bit more patient, instead of searching for decoder rings The same patience that immediately posted new records...one might say this is just reciprocation. All joking aside, there are no sides to this "battle" I see already forming. Rather, just simply trying to learn all the facts. It seems most people in the community are rushing to catch up. This would be a nice place to get all the proper information, so we are all informed. Now who wants ice cream. ::counting raised hands::

All RW formations will soon be retired, due to some formations only having one hand placed on an individual. The new protocol will require both hands to be firmly placed on one individual. That being said, the largest RW formation ever flown is a 6-way Cat/Sidebody. A special thanks to 5 Hour Energy for sponsoring the event.

Hi Kenneth, No rules were changed at this last meeting and no records were retired. I was just on the USPA website because someone else asked the same question and the 68-way is still the current National Record. http://www.uspa.org/USPAMembers/RecordsAwards/ExistingRecords/National/tabid/144/Default.aspx Blue skies, Scott

I saw that too, but can't find anything on the USPA site to confirm it. I just emailed Scott Smith, hopefully he can shed some light on this.

Looks like it's gonna be the pro-mouth switch! Bonus points for being able to take photos with a stupid grin on my face. Thanks for the help!

Has anyone tried all the camera switches - bite, tongue, blow and have a clear favorite? If so why. I'm thinking about getting a blow switch (insert giggle) due to ease of getting multiple shots quickly. Any info would be greatly appreciated, cheers!

Thanks guys! I appreciate it.

I'm thinking about getting a semi stowless bag, and was curious how other wingsuiters felt about using them. I've only known 1 wingsuiter to utilize it, and he loves it. I'm just wondering if the forward speed of a wingsuit could negate the stowless feature? As in, having all the lines come out at once? UPT uses 2 stows and a tuck tab like feature. I've also seen some companies use magnets. I included 2 different brands below. UPT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5c-FW4KMPE&feature=related Magnetiz Lazybag: http://www.compal.be/LazybagEN.html

As mandated by the Unicorn Conservation act of 2009, I'm drug free. Unicorn Boogie is totally happening. We're pretty much just using Andreea's awesome photo for advertisements (Will pay royalties of course). Michael Bay is confirmed for director of cinematography.

I'm glad you mentioned it first. I was just about to.... I attached a picture of a certain someone flying VERY dangerous and careless in a Unicorn-RW flock. There is a laundry list of mistakes: Too close proximity to 'corn horn, possibility of handles being caught/pulled, under the influence of alcohol, utilizing a skydiving rig while proxy flying, trying to dock on the 'corn horn...etc I could be wrong, but I doubt it. This was found, once I zoomed in and enhanced the original photo, which is also attached. Lets learn from her mistakes.

Clearly the First Unicorn will win, as the second one is made of paper, and even arguing that the first is a painting......Canvas owns paper. Jus saying. I know what a majestic unicorn looks like. I've owned 'Corns since late 2001, which are still grazing the skies I might add...so don't lecture me on the dichotomy of power and beauty. However, if you could send an email to the person responsible for the artistry of the origami Unicorn, I would be pleased. I never claimed to be an elitist, I'm still learning from these creatures everyday. I just feel that so many people want to get larger horned unicorns, before they are properly ready for such a task. $200 simply does not cut it. Given the pageantry and illustration of brawn on canvas, I will have to agree with both of you. However, that still doesn't answer how you're caring for these majestic beasts on $200. If you could post photos of your stable, maybe this could shed some light. I'm also currently working on a "Unicorn Boogie", complete with a sunset Unicorn RW flight through space and time. We here a Shorbicorns have been raising and processing 'corn meant for years. We have always been able to feed and stable our 'corns for much less than 200 dollars. As the only good part of the 'corn is the "actual" horn we must keep costs low to produce profit. see attached photos I am shocked, and appalled at how you operate Shorbicons. Conversational efforts are under way, at my business Unicorns Inc. Attached is a photo I took this morning, of me on my speckled unicorn (very rare). I am a wealthy business man, and would like to offer you a substantial sum, for the rights to Shorbicons and all of your magical steeds. Please consider this offer.

Clearly the First Unicorn will win, as the second one is made of paper, and even arguing that the first is a painting......Canvas owns paper. Jus saying. I know what a majestic unicorn looks like. I've owned 'Corns since late 2001, which are still grazing the skies I might add...so don't lecture me on the dichotomy of power and beauty. However, if you could send an email to the person responsible for the artistry of the origami Unicorn, I would be pleased. I never claimed to be an elitist, I'm still learning from these creatures everyday. I just feel that so many people want to get larger horned unicorns, before they are properly ready for such a task. $200 simply does not cut it. Given the pageantry and illustration of brawn on canvas, I will have to agree with both of you. However, that still doesn't answer how you're caring for these majestic beasts on $200. If you could post photos of your stable, maybe this could shed some light. I'm also currently working on a "Unicorn Boogie", complete with a sunset Unicorn RW flight through space and time.

spending $200 for a month to figure it out is worth it and the more cost effective route. Absolutely ridiculous, a Unicorn cannot survive off of $200. really? if you can't keep a unicorn alive for $200, maybe you shouldn't even be associating with these majestic beasts. You don't know the first thing about proper horn care. I dare you to look me in the eyes, and tell me otherwise.