stilletto-babe

Members
  • Content

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Gear

  • Main Canopy Size
    107
  • Reserve Canopy Size
    126
  • AAD
    Cypres 2

Jump Profile

  • Home DZ
    not quite yet
  • Licensing Organization
    uspa
  • Number of Jumps
    1500
  • Years in Sport
    5
  • First Choice Discipline
    Swooping
  • First Choice Discipline Jump Total
    1000
  • Second Choice Discipline
    Skysurfing
  • Second Choice Discipline Jump Total
    200
  1. WOW! Is any else disturbed by this? It seems that we have an individual who dropped her gear off w/a 3rd party, instead of taking it to a DZ(what, she was too busy?). She claims to be sure that the damage to her free-bag/bridle couldn’t have happened prior to her delivery. But she goes on to admit that she didn’t inspect(or evidently even look at), after allegedly pulling her handles( actually, just one Handle). At least two observant, and objective readers have pointed out that the gear appeared not to have been disturbed, any more than necessary to remove the AAD. Yet she, and dz.com are more than willing to post an individuals name, and that of a business. I guess their ( Vtskydiver, and dz.com) policy is much like the Better Business Bureau: “its not our job to decide if the complaint is valid. We just post the complaint in a public forum”. I’m curious : how many readers think this all occurred exactly like Vtskydiver says? And, more importantly: how many of you have decided, based solely on this uncorroborated complaint, that the DZ in question will not be getting your rigging business in the future?