judedude
Members-
Content
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
0%
Community Reputation
0 NeutralGear
-
Main Canopy Size
170
-
Reserve Canopy Size
175
-
AAD
Astra
Jump Profile
-
Home DZ
Gold Coast Skydiving
-
License
B
-
License Number
28430
-
Licensing Organization
USPA
-
Number of Jumps
65
-
Years in Sport
1
-
First Choice Discipline
Formation Skydiving
-
First Choice Discipline Jump Total
40
-
Second Choice Discipline
Freeflying
-
Second Choice Discipline Jump Total
8
-
Thanks for the input everyone. Point taken. I'm just going to order a new container and continue jumping the Hornet 170 for a while.
-
N/A
-
You're probably right about the container size not being a big deal. I am still trying to decide what I want to buy and may end up sticking with 170's. But, back to my main question... is there a transition in line length that occurs as canopies get smaller that adds an additional effect beyond loading? Or, am I getting a line of bull.
-
My factors are really just container size and comfort. I have a blast flying the 170. But, since this new rig will be with me a while, I'm considering dropping down one canopy size.
-
I was discussing with a more experienced skydiver my intent to downsize next season from a Hornet 170 to a Safire 2 149 or similar semi-elliptical 9-cell. He told me that, in addition to increased wing loading, there was a non-proportional transition in line length that would have a dramatic effect. But, he could not say at what size canopy this change first appears. For my modest jump numbers, I am a strong and safety-minded canopy pilot, comfortable in no wind in 100 degree heat. So, especially after doubling my jump numbers, I am not especially concerned about the slight increase in loading (from 1.08 to 1.2) going to the Safire 2. But, is this line shortening factor real? And, if so, is it a factor in my case? Thanks!
-
William is my AFF instructor and skydiving mentor. I was crushed to hear about his accident but am so very glad that he is awake and aware. Hang in there!