allons2m

No. It’s unfortunate that your ignorance to the natural world impedes your ability to grasp such a concept. I find it amusing that you statement above starts with, intuitively; when clearly we are discussing a counter-intuitive concept. If you have value to add to this conversation please do. Otherwise, I suspect this will be my last engagement with a troll the likes of you. Joellercoaster is correct: No. (I'll emulate his succinct style this time and leave it at that.) I looked for some of the simplest examples to explain this concept. If you can't comprehend that free-fall = zero-g then I will stop trying. http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter11section4.rhtml

No. It’s unfortunate that your ignorance to the natural world impedes your ability to grasp such a concept. I find it amusing that you statement above starts with, intuitively; when clearly we are discussing a counter-intuitive concept. If you have value to add to this conversation please do. Otherwise, I suspect this will be my last engagement with a troll the likes of you.

I’ll open by saying that I’m no physicist, but I know that free fall is zero gravity. Sounds odd when there is so much wind resistance, but whether you are at terminal or not, if you are in free-fall, you are in zero-g. This is stated in the equivalence principal of physics. Being in a state of zero gravity in free-fall, I would speculate that blood would flow even more freely than it does when we are on the ground. “Counterintuitively, a uniform gravitational field does not by itself cause stress or strain, and a body in free fall in such an environment experiences no g-force acceleration and feels weightless. This is also termed zero-g.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weightlessness and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle