KennyS1134

Members
  • Content

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by KennyS1134


  1. Hey guys and gals,
    I'm pretty new to the photography aspect of skydiving, and can't seem to get stable video [:/] I have a Rawa vision, with a sidemounted Cx150, in a cookie cage with an opteka .3x 37mm lens, and a top mounted T2i with the kit lens. I sent back a medium size because it was waaay too tiny, and got a Large. It fits really snug. I can wiggle my head and get a tiny bit of movement. I've put more padding in to counter this and it did not show any difference in flight.

    Even before I added the still camera, the video was noticeable shaky. I know I'm not just zoning out and letting my head bobble around in the wind. I really focus on good technique. At first I thought the camera was just loose in the box, so I put insulation in the spaces, which didn't help at all. Now that I'm jumping a still, the shakiness has intensified, which I knew would happen...just not this much.

    My settings are as follow: Focus=manual, wide angle lens setting on, steadyshot off. Am I missing something (I hope so)?

    I know there are plenty of jumpers with similar top/side mounted cameras that get really stable video....so it's frustrating when I have good still shots, and centered video....but shaky video.

  2. Dear Photography Gods,
    I have a Canon T2i with kit lens (lame I know), and was wondering what modes/settings would be the best choice for some super badass (and probably out of frame) skydiving shots. I have been playing around with it for 15mins, and so far the camera has defeated me. Once I regain my strength I'll try and tackle it again!
    I did a lot of research, in order to decide which camera best fit my needs, but now that I have one, the task of learning this discipline seems pretty daunting. I mean, there are soooo many different settings and modes. I've always admired skydiving photographers, but now I have an entirely new appreciation for all the work (and money) they pour into this discipline. Any advice or guidance would be greatly appreciated. Cheers!

  3. Quote

    Quote

    I would like to see something official that states changes to the grid affect existing records. At this point it is all a bunch of hogwash that again we need our decoder rings for.



    Ive read statements that USPA will announce updates/changes on their website soon. Seems like you need to learn and be a bit more patient, instead of searching for decoder rings:P


    The same patience that immediately posted new records...one might say this is just reciprocation. :P

    All joking aside, there are no sides to this "battle" I see already forming. Rather, just simply trying to learn all the facts. It seems most people in the community are rushing to catch up. This would be a nice place to get all the proper information, so we are all informed.

    Now who wants ice cream. ::counting raised hands::

  4. All RW formations will soon be retired, due to some formations only having one hand placed on an individual. The new protocol will require both hands to be firmly placed on one individual. That being said, the largest RW formation ever flown is a 6-way Cat/Sidebody. A special thanks to 5 Hour Energy for sponsoring the event.

  5. Hi Kenneth,

    No rules were changed at this last meeting and no records were retired. I was just on the USPA website because someone else asked the same question and the 68-way is still the current National Record.

    http://www.uspa.org/USPAMembers/RecordsAwards/ExistingRecords/National/tabid/144/Default.aspx

    Blue skies,

    Scott

  6. Quote

    Quote

    Someone messaged me by Facebook to tell me that the USPA has changed the rules relating to wingsuit records (again). Apparently, this means that the new California - arguably US - record for largest flock is a four way. (Either that or it is a hum drum ten way flock from Utah a few years ago; I am a little unclear on this...)

    Since I don't follow any of the record discussions, can someone explain to me what is different about the new rule (compared to the old) and why the change was needed?



    I saw that too, but can't find anything on the USPA site to confirm it.



    I just emailed Scott Smith, hopefully he can shed some light on this.

  7. Has anyone tried all the camera switches - bite, tongue, blow and have a clear favorite? If so why. I'm thinking about getting a blow switch (insert giggle) due to ease of getting multiple shots quickly. Any info would be greatly appreciated, cheers!

  8. I'm thinking about getting a semi stowless bag, and was curious how other wingsuiters felt about using them. I've only known 1 wingsuiter to utilize it, and he loves it. I'm just wondering if the forward speed of a wingsuit could negate the stowless feature? As in, having all the lines come out at once? UPT uses 2 stows and a tuck tab like feature. I've also seen some companies use magnets. I included 2 different brands below.

    UPT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5c-FW4KMPE&feature=related

    Magnetiz Lazybag: http://www.compal.be/LazybagEN.html

  9. Quote

    This thread went from weird sales pitches, to offhand jokes, to a lot of people hinting at a big elephant in the room that everyone seems to be curious about, yet nobody wants to directly comment about.

    Sitting back with popcorn to see where this goes...:S



    I'm glad you mentioned it first. I was just about to....

    I attached a picture of a certain someone flying VERY dangerous and careless in a Unicorn-RW flock. There is a laundry list of mistakes: Too close proximity to 'corn horn, possibility of handles being caught/pulled, under the influence of alcohol, utilizing a skydiving rig while proxy flying, trying to dock on the 'corn horn...etc

    I could be wrong, but I doubt it. This was found, once I zoomed in and enhanced the original photo, which is also attached.

    Lets learn from her mistakes.

  10. Quote

    Quote

    Quote

    Quote

    That's a pretty elitist viewpoint. Not all unicorns have those long and dainty horns that require special attention that you seem to prefer.

    Look at these two examples and tell me which one is more wondrous? And which would win in a bar brawl?

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Hht2oeFmIMc/TWNx_oA8spI/AAAAAAAAACg/xsdTCvBzv_8/s400/unicorn_rainbow.jpg

    http://www.giladorigami.com/P_Unicorn_Montroll.JPG


    I think the answer is clear.




    Clearly the First Unicorn will win, as the second one is made of paper, and even arguing that the first is a painting......Canvas owns paper. Jus saying.



    I know what a majestic unicorn looks like. I've owned 'Corns since late 2001, which are still grazing the skies I might add...so don't lecture me on the dichotomy of power and beauty. However, if you could send an email to the person responsible for the artistry of the origami Unicorn, I would be pleased.

    I never claimed to be an elitist, I'm still learning from these creatures everyday. I just feel that so many people want to get larger horned unicorns, before they are properly ready for such a task. $200 simply does not cut it.

    Given the pageantry and illustration of brawn on canvas, I will have to agree with both of you. However, that still doesn't answer how you're caring for these majestic beasts on $200. If you could post photos of your stable, maybe this could shed some light.

    I'm also currently working on a "Unicorn Boogie", complete with a sunset Unicorn RW flight through space and time.




    We here a Shorbicorns have been raising and processing 'corn meant for years. We have always been able to feed and stable our 'corns for much less than 200 dollars. As the only good part of the 'corn is the "actual" horn we must keep costs low to produce profit.

    see attached photos



    I am shocked, and appalled at how you operate Shorbicons. Conversational efforts are under way, at my business Unicorns Inc. Attached is a photo I took this morning, of me on my speckled unicorn (very rare). I am a wealthy business man, and would like to offer you a substantial sum, for the rights to Shorbicons and all of your magical steeds. Please consider this offer.

  11. Quote

    Quote

    That's a pretty elitist viewpoint. Not all unicorns have those long and dainty horns that require special attention that you seem to prefer.

    Look at these two examples and tell me which one is more wondrous? And which would win in a bar brawl?

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Hht2oeFmIMc/TWNx_oA8spI/AAAAAAAAACg/xsdTCvBzv_8/s400/unicorn_rainbow.jpg

    http://www.giladorigami.com/P_Unicorn_Montroll.JPG


    I think the answer is clear.




    Clearly the First Unicorn will win, as the second one is made of paper, and even arguing that the first is a painting......Canvas owns paper. Jus saying.



    I know what a majestic unicorn looks like. I've owned 'Corns since late 2001, which are still grazing the skies I might add...so don't lecture me on the dichotomy of power and beauty. However, if you could send an email to the person responsible for the artistry of the origami Unicorn, I would be pleased.

    I never claimed to be an elitist, I'm still learning from these creatures everyday. I just feel that so many people want to get larger horned unicorns, before they are properly ready for such a task. $200 simply does not cut it.

    Given the pageantry and illustration of brawn on canvas, I will have to agree with both of you. However, that still doesn't answer how you're caring for these majestic beasts on $200. If you could post photos of your stable, maybe this could shed some light.

    I'm also currently working on a "Unicorn Boogie", complete with a sunset Unicorn RW flight through space and time.

  12. Quote

    Quote

    spending $200 for a month to figure it out is worth it and the more cost effective route.


    Absolutely ridiculous, a Unicorn cannot survive off of $200.

    :S really? if you can't keep a unicorn alive for $200, maybe you shouldn't even be associating with these majestic beasts.

    You don't know the first thing about proper horn care. I dare you to look me in the eyes, and tell me otherwise.

  • Pricing on 2nd hand suits 20% from new price? Ive seen plenty of good deals varying from 250 to 500 Euros. The FlyLikeBrick website currently has a nice Phantom2 listed for 400,- and a SM1 for roughly the same in the 2nd hand section. Sellers may even negotiate price and get it cheaper.

    Although this is a nice alternative, it only allows for relatively small growth. Renting flying costumes aka wingsuits, gives a lot of people the chance to fly suits, they otherwise couldn't afford or properly fit into. Wicked has a fleet of wings, and has gotten more people wingsuiting in the midwest, than ever before. I've gotten to fly with a lot of people in rentals, that were happy just to be able to get their flock on. Even if they're not going to order a suit, they can still dedicate a solid month to gain skill and experience... which is the name of the game.

  • Hello, I just got all my camera gear in the mail yesterday, and am having some problems getting everything how I want it. The helmet is a Rawa Vision, and I have a sony cx150, with an opteka .3x 37mm lens that will be fitting into the cookie cage. Now, my main problem is side mounting the cage properly, so that I don't have pieces of the helmet or my nose showing up on film. Mounting the box on an angle seems to solve it, but then it's not straight on the helmet....or do I mount it with the lens sticking out past the helmet. I realize these are most likely stupid rookie questions, but I just really wanna have it done right and get all badass shenanigans documented properly! Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!