skygeek

Someone mentioned before:

"Why didn't we know before it happened?"

Some had a clue

http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/august2004/082604alexwarned.htm

My question for the class is why did NORAD stand down?

Its always impressed me how we could be loosing the war on drugs. I mean we are fighting a war against people on drugs. And loosing! How can we expect to win any other war when we cant beat the junkies? The untold BILLIONS spent and we are no closer to anything but more citizens in Jail.

I know it makes me queasy.

What do you think of the idea to NEVER re-elect ANYONE! Would it make a difference?

Quote

These are both entertaining pieces, Though you have been publicly schooled by lawrocket in some way, remember that he is a self proclaimed libertarian and not a republican.

The Constitution is an amazingly effective document considering it's longevity. However the only way that it can sustain it's usefulness is through constant vigilance and action. It's not wize to subscribe to the rhetoric of any one particular political party for that reason. The U.S. govt. was forged to incorporate balance, That is the genius of it! The founding members realized that humans are easily caught up in their own agendas and belief systems which can snowball given the # of individuals that can be swayed one way or another. If a tipping point is reached a totalitarian regime is the result.

We all have a responsibility to maintain its balance. Why? because Freedom is at stake so if you like to do things like blather freely on the internet, pay attention.

For example, an interesting piece by Bill Moyers will air on Wed this week on PBS It may be dry and of a seemingly liberal nature and for those of us with A.D.D. it will be difficult to pay attention BUT the guy is onto something.

Maybe my post was misunderstood. I in no way ment to slam one party anymore than the other, because IMHO it took both parties to get us here.

Furthermore I think Lawocket did a great job updating the post.

The Constitution of the United States 2.0


As there have lately been so many changes to the basic functioning of the United States -- a shift of powers here, a whittling away of rights there, it seems a good time to issue a revised version of the basic operating document. This is the real Republican Contract with America.

We the Republicans of the United States, in Order to prevent any challenge to our continued Supremacy, free ourselves from the Confines of Justice, placate the Tranquil masses, degrade the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of War Profiteering for ourselves and our Friends, do ordain and establish Constitution 2.0 for the United States of America.

ARTICLE I
Section 1
All legislative Powers are hereby ceded to the Executive branch, though the Congress will still make a Grand Noise and wave their arms as if they give a Damn.

Section 2
The House of Representatives will consist of those best able to Lick the Boots of the Lobbyists and Corporations lining their pockets.

No one can be a Representative unless Fox News says that he is a Patriotic American,

Representation shall be apportioned based on numbers of people willing to Pay for the Privilege. The actual Enumeration shall be made whenever it is of benefit to Republicans.

Representatives will choose a Speaker and other Officers by how willing these Officers are to turn a blind eye to the Crimes of Republicans and how Loudly they will Declare the Daily Talking Points.

Section 3
The Senate shall... oh hell, just see Section 1.

The Vice President shall be President of the Senate and can use any Four Letter Word he wants in talking to Senators, so F-You, Leahy.

Section 4
Elections will be held whenever Diebold is prepared to provide the Right Results.

Section 5
Each House shall make a mockery of policing itself and shall be free to throw out all the Democrats they want, but Republicans who engage in Pederasty shall be protected.

Section 6
Republican Senators and Representatives will enjoy a Revolving Door of organizations who pay for votes, and give them jobs any time they are taking a break.

Section 7
The House and Senate shall apply a large Rubber Stamp to every suggestion issued by the President.

Section 8
The House shall raise all the taxes they want on the poor and middle-class so long as they leave the Rich alone.

The Congress will dodge all responsibility for decisions on War.

Section 9
The rules of Immigration shall be set in a way that protects Republican majorities.

Section 10
Any treaties are not worth the paper they are Written on.

ARTICLE II
Section 1
The President can do anything he wants, that's what's good about being President. Heh heh.

Section 2
The President can wear any uniform he wants and pretend to fly planes.

Section 3
The President and the Congress should split some beers now and then, but he doesn't have to invite any Democrats.

Section 4
Having sex is a good Reason to get rid of a President. Lying, being Incompetent, Wasting Billions, and getting Thousands of Americans Killed, is fine.

ARTICLE III
This Article was full of that Judge stuff, so we just took it out.

ARTICLE IV
We can declare any place we want part of the United States so they can call their stuff "Made in the USA," but don't go thinking they get representation.

ARTICLE V
Amendments to the Constitution will only be for Really Important Stuff, like how scared we are of Homos and Foreign People.

ARTICLE VI
You can ignore any part of this Constitution if it gets in the way of Profit or something that gets Republicans elected.

ARTICLE VII
People are supposed to be afraid all the Time, otherwise they do too damn much Thinking.

posted from http://www.politicalcortex.com/story/2006/9/30/22613/4078

Of course you didn't. Why would you want to be informed about the film in question? Its soo much easier to just sit back and slam it as another 911 nut job film.

The funny thing is the biggest part of the film is not about 911. Opps I guess you have to watch it to see that.

The important info in this film is not 911. But example after example of state sponsered "terrorism" in our recent past.

Whats the old saying? History repeats itself? no, Forget the past and your doomed to repeat it? ya maybe....

Welcome to the New World Order. Expect no Mercy.

So did you even watch it?

Its really easy to slam a film when you just say they are lying and provide no evidence.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,25689-1901558,00.html

Another article with more detail...

The supply of organs in China is severely restricted because of religious traditions that require the body to be whole when it enters the afterlife. Yet the country has carried out more organ transplants than any other except the US. Since 1993 China has performed 60,000 kidney transplants, 6,000 liver transplants and 250 heart transplants.

Thats alot of death row inmates...

All good info, based on fact as far as I can tell. Gotta love de-classified
documents.

An undercover investigation by BBC News finds that China has a flourishing trade of organs from executed prisoners. China is becoming the destination of choice for rich foreigners in need of organ transplants. One hospital said it could provide a liver for about $100,000.

China has more executions than any other country in the world. Officials told undercover reporters that executions increase prior to national holidays, so many organs are available around those times.


http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Video_BBC_hidden_cam_shows_China_0927.html

http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/blog.php?id=244

I think its all about to hit the Fan.

http://www.welfarestate.com/911/

Anyone got a snopes link for this one?

anyone?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4683371.stm

Here is an article from the bbc about it being re-examined for possibl links to cancer.

"Aspartame's ADI is set at 40 milligrams per kilogram of body weight. This is equivalent to 2,800 milligrams for an average British adult.

For an average three-year-old child the amount is of the order of 600 milligrams.

An adult would have to consume 14 cans of a sugar-free drink every day before reaching the ADI, assuming the sweetener was used in the drink at the maximum permitted level. "

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7936222&dopt=Abstract

Quote

This sort of thing won't stop until law makers and the general public are made to realise it's not a given right to own a weapon, but a priviledge, i don't care what the 2nd Amendment says, thats well out of date and open to misinterpretation anyway.

My reply is attached below:

Well you have a point there. The thing is my cousin is in tank repair so he's not likly to get shot at drectly but somhing lik DU might end up killing him anyway.

I wanted to bring the subect up to him as he is a very close family member of mine but I want to be really danmed informed when I do.

I have had the misfortune of seing other family members suffer from cancer due to Agent orange. And honestly I'd rather not bring up DU if it is a load of crap.

Ok guys can we get back on topic now?

Is DU a danger to our service men in the Middle east?

On this topic I dont really care whos fault it is, I just want to know if it is going to be another Agent Orange like issue.

Thank you for your time

http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.shtml

This article sems to agree with ya Bill ,and includes a diagram of the internal supports of the building.

My question for you is what happened to the 47 central beams? From the diagram it would appear that the central beams ran the entire height of the building some 1300ft into the air. If this is true we have 47 1300 ft I beams surrounded by the floors then the outside walls. If the floors started to collapse as you have described. Wouldnt some portion of those 47 1300ft colums remain standing?

I would have guessed that as the floors sheared off thier support that it would leave the core somewhat intact, Like a stack of records on a spindal.

What is your opion on this?

I have a question.


What about all the firefighters and rescue personal that, on video , you can see talking about the explotions going off in the towers as low as the 8th floor BEFORE the building colapes?

Or the Witnesses that said a bomb went off in the basement of tower 1 near the time of the first impact?

Would you belive people that were there?


We teach them to take their patriotism at second-hand; to shout with the largest crowd without examining into the right or wrong of the matter--exactly as boys under monarchies are taught and have always been taught. We teach them to regard as traitors, and hold in aversion and contempt, such as do not shout with the crowd, and so here in our democracy we are cheering a thing which of all things is most foreign to it and out of place--the delivery of our political conscience into somebody else's keeping. This is patriotism on the Russian plan.
- Mark Twain, a Biography

So your own Freedoms arent worth fighting for yourself? You want someone eles to do it for you? o I see...

Here is a very interesting read I found. On the study of DU rounds in 1977. Its kinda interesting how much we havent learned in almost 30 years.

http://deploymentlink.osd.mil/du_library/pdfs/1999071_0000017.pdf

Evaluations on this news site please?
http://www.sfbayview.com/012605/headsroll012605.shtml