EVickiW

Right. Was it a 'device' when you phoned Bruce Kitt, the head of NWA.org, asked him questions...and then posted the results on the internet without warning him in advance you planned to do that? You embarassed him you know. Then you asked me if I'd like to hear what else he said. Actually...I don't care but I could take a guess. ***'Don't call me anymore...' That's a joke. Not funny to Kitt I'm sure.

Actually, I'm not. And you don't. You simply dump your trashy insults here. Quality material? You wouldn't know what that was if a Book of Instructions was dropped into your lap by a sympathetic angel.

Well, no. I've said many times I hope you guys figure out something good on the case. I don't write for the 'Cooper community' or work for them either. That's a reletively small group, and the members range from nice (377, Amazon) to downright vindictive (Georger, who has been doing that to everyone for YEARS). I write for the general public. The reason you don't see any Cooper-related articles on other Cooper sites is because I seldom, if ever, post to those sites. Just Dropzone, mostly. Can you really 'own' an investigation? Sure you can, especially when it concerns a single individual such as Kenny Christiansen. Others can investigate him as well, of course. I just decided a while ago that due to the backbiting and hatred that exists in Cooperland, that it might be better to keep some things confidential until if and when you can verify certain items in that investigation. I consider some of the folks who investigate Cooper to be rabid dogs who occasionally eat their young, or who will go to any lengths to discredit anyone else investigating the case. Oh...we learned this lesson you can bet on that. I've had to take a lot of flak from those folks you call the 'Cooper community' who are a mixed bunch indeed. Dealing with them you almost have to throw out the baby with the bath water because some can't be trusted. And I don't think any of them REALLY want to know the identity of the hijacker because then their agenda...their work...their suspect, would be all for nothing. And this is their greatest fear. It's a convention where competition exceeds the search for truth, where the discussion is more important than actually identifying Cooper. I am REALLY looking forward to the interview this Sunday between AB staff and the witness. We've known this person for about a year and a half. Thank God we never revealed their identity publicly because the Cooper Sharks would be calling them now and scaring the shit out of them, or telling them in emails how crazy we are. If your little community is buzzing about this, I wouldn't be surprised although you should be worrying about other points in the case and less about Christiansen. Leave him to us. We're figuring him out quicker than you think. I really have to get going now, but I'll leave you with that. You may believe we 'hate' you or something but nothing could be further from the truth. We just don't trust some of you...big difference.

Because you are in Washington, you are required by federal law to issue a statement to the other person when recording a conversation. Washington is a two-party consent state. However, in Minnesota and Iowa, it is a one-party consent state. Any recorded comments between two people are not considered private and only one party needs to know it is being recorded or used outside of the conversation. If Kitt said something in yours, Decoded or KC's favor, would you still be upset about it? And...I would tell you all about my upcoming weekend and every trivial detail, but it is really nunya. Get it? Ever hear of over sharing? EDITED TO ADD: Why do you think Kitt would be embarrassed? I think you are embarrassed for touting him like you have been and then a phone call was made. Then the call verifies his feeling about KC, Decoded and you. Did you ask him permission to post his travel plans to Seattle along with his intentions to attend your slideshow presentation? Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Can we expect a screenplay? Looking forward to it. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

In 1997, was interviewed by KARE 11 in Minneapolis shortly after the story of Melvin Wilson aired on Unsolved Mysteries. After the editing, I watched the segment on the news. They cut and paste it so bad I did not recognize the original story...goes to show ya...The media is not always honest. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

https://myportal.bsd405.org/MySite/Public.aspx?accountname=BSD%5candroskor This could be their son. He has 31 years as an educator. If he started his career in his twenties, this would make him in his 50's. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Robert isn't going to answer it. He's going to wait until August 9 to announce it. But, those of you who don't live in Washington won't be able to attend and he's not going to publish his PDF for the public. Sorry, non-Washintonians. It sucks to be you. But, in reading those documents I think Dawn had power of attorney for Richard and later inherited his property, so I think that was her father. I thought this was Bernie's sister? how could the father's name be Androsko? where is the name Androsko coming from? Dawn is mentioned as power of attorney with a Elva Gesstman... A Richard L. Androsko died in a Washington Dept of Transportation work zone accident on August 28, 1984. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/safety/brake/memorial.htm Smokin99......Can you find anything on your end about this man? Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Here is an excerpt from an linked article about Tina Mucklow. .... after graduation she found work as a flight attendant, and eventually moved to the West Coast. “I mostly flew to Japan the last five years,” she says. http://www.eugeneweekly.com/article/tina-larson Flew to Japan for five years after the hijacking. Do ya think ....just maybe.....she would have recognized Kenny as Cooper on one of her trips overseas. They most certainly would have flown together at least once. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Blevins, What in hell do you think you are doing with the above claims? What evidence did you produce that put any war criminal behind bars? Personally, I would bet that you just copied something that appeared in the media in your article on Newsvine (which I have never read). Your apparent belief that you are an investigative reporter, or whatever, is soundly refuted by your irresponsible claims about KC and the other BS you insist on posting on this thread. On your claims about the war criminal, I'll bet that the law enforcement officials in a number of countries cooperated to do the investigating and prosecution. And you weren't working with or for them. Robert99 If you haven't read the article, how can you judge it? You just said you didn't even bother to read it. The article is a compendium of research I did on John Jemjanjuk, and is SOURCED where necessary. See...you would have known this already if you had actually READ it. At the time I wrote the original article, Jemjanjuk was trying to return to the US. I merely put all the available evidence against him into a single package, to show WHY he shouldn't be allowed to return. The two biggest reasons of course were that he entered the US under false pretenses to gain citizenship...and that he assisted in the Final Solution. It's just one of many illustrated articles I've done for Newsvine. If you read three of them a day, it would take you almost six months to get through all of them. His story was just one. Blevins, Your original claim above is that, "I once worked on pinning a frickin' lying-ass war criminal to the wall." Then you later state, "I merely put all the available evidence against him into a single package, to show WHY he shouldn't be allowed to return." Being a compiler of public media stories does not make you an investigative reporter. Did you discover a single fact that wasn't already published in someone else's public work? Or did you come up with a new interpretation of that public information? Did the US Department of Justice give you a citation for your outstanding efforts to assist them? I seem to recall that this specific matter was in the media for a number of years and I don't remember anything being mentioned about your efforts. Robert99 RMB may need a few more quotes.I took the liberty of searching for a few that really fit the program.....Your'e welcome! “When we don’t put the brakes on our self-absorption, we have nothing stopping us from total self-destruction. We become the fruits of our actions.” - Zeena Schreck, Beatdom #11: The Nature Issue “If pimps and thieves were invariably sentenced, all decent people would get to thinking they themselves were constantly innocent.” - Albert Camus, The Fall “The truth posed a great dilemma for a man who always had to be right, and yet, for all his grandeur, was often wrong.” - David Halberstam, The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War “It is the mark of the mind untrained to take its own processes as valid for all men, and its own judgments for absolute truth.” - Aleister Crowley, Magical and Philosophical Commentaries on The Book of the Law “When the healthy pursuit of self-interest and self-realization turns into self-absorption, other people can lose their intrinsic value in our eyes and become mere means to the fulfillment of our needs and desires.” - P.M. Forni, The Civility Solution: What to Do When People Are Rude “The pain of the narcissist is that, to him, everything is really a threat. What doesn't surrender in reverence is blasphemous to a high opinion of oneself - the burden of self-importance. The narcissist reconstructs his own law of gravity which states that all things and all creatures must adhere to his personal satisfaction, but when they do not, the pain is far more intense than it is for one who is free from the clamors of 'I'.” - Criss Jami “I bet it gets pretty lonely with only your ego for company.” - Alexandra Bracken, Never Fade Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Let me get this straight....You came back to this thread to tell everyone you're planning to have an event that pretty much everyone on this thread is expressly NOT invited to. But, it's other people, not you, who are rude on DZ. Got it. Dang it, Mark. Now what will we do that weekend? Since we are now labeled as mean, should we go downtown Seattle and trip people then poke them with sticks? Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

This morning...MSN.com and other news sources are telling the following story about NamUs and missing/unidentified skeletal remains found in Portland almost 30 years ago. In May 1986, loggers clear-cutting an isolated section of Portland discovered the skeletal remains of a man who had been dead for at least a half-century. Marvin Clark went missing on Halloween weekend, 1926. My point being...skeletal remains (along with personal belongings, shoes, etc.)were found intact after 60 years in the Pacific Northwest. There may be hope in finding the remains belonging to "Cooper". Read more: http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/04/case_of_oregon_mystery_bones_f.html#incart_m-rpt-1 In the following article, my Namus liaison, Janet Franson, was quoted in the last few sentences. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/30/investigators-seek-dna-to-close-126-oregon-missing-person-case/ http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mystery-oregon-corpse-could-be-oldest-missing-man-marvin-clark-n93241 Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

MarkBennett and I were talking about that. I really do not have a suspect. If Cooper is my Dad, then I will know what happened. If Cooper is not my Dad, then I will continue to wonder what happened to him. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Of all the suspects, Vicki's dad has the best match for this feature described by Mitchell. 377 To be fair...so did Gossett. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Are these witnesses that say he quit wearing the toupee after the hijacking, the same witnesses who remember that he skipped out on Thanksgiving dinner the weekend of the hijacking? Also, Ckret shot down the idea of Cooper wearing a toupee earlier in the forum. He basically said that no one mentioned that they thought he was wearing one. Much like I have a hard time with someone having colored contacts in 1971, I also have a hard time believing that Cooper could have worn toupee in 1971 and it went completely unnoticed, except by Mr. Mitchell, who was only a casual observer and had no reason whatsoever to remember anything about Cooper. After listening to Mitchell's interview given to the WSHM, I suspect that Mitchell was more than just a casual observer. He admitted he was a little confused that Cooper was taking ALL the attention of Tina. He looked and studied Cooper. I am not saying I think like a guy, however in his interview it is evident that Mitchell looked at Cooper and compared his physical features to himself. He was looking for a reason this young, attractive flight attendant would be attracted to this old man in his 40's. I can say women do this when they see a good looking guy with an average women..."the what does she got that I do not" way of thinking. Listening to the interview, he does not confirm Cooper had a toupee. He was attempting to describe his hair and appearance. It is unfortunate he was cut off by the museum staff and his thoughts about it were never explained fully. Here is the WSHM page with the link to Mitchell's interview. http://collections.washingtonhistory.org/details.aspx?id=122559 I think you meant to say (that Mitchell said): "the what does (he) got that I do not" way of thinking. not: "the what does she got that I do not" way of thinking. The issue was 'what does this old guy (Cooper) got' that I dont have ... not 'what does Tina got that I dont have'. I was speaking from a women's point of view. An example about women checking out other women and relating it back to Mitchell, because...well, who really understands the opposite sex? This is why I believe Mitchell really checked out Cooper...In the interview, he stated: Bill Mitchell: “He would open it up and have his hand in the briefcase sometimes, which I thought…I mean I noticed peculiar things. You know…” “What’s that guy doing? What’s that geeky guy, who’s got the attention of this blond stewardess, doing something like that?” I mean, you know, that, that didn't make sense. and So…he was slight, he had, I mean his hair looked, I mean I thought his hair…I mean I really picked on him ‘cause like I said you’re up in the plane for over three hours and nothing to do. And he had a white shirt, skinny little tie, you know, suit, and he didn’t look like, an executive and not to be getting all that attention.”. In addition the interviewer asked and Bill answered: Poyner: “…specific questions Bill? You mentioned his sunglasses. Now, was there any point, when you noticed him…did he always have the sunglasses on? Do you, or did you ever see him without them on?” Bill Mitchell: “Had them on the whole time.” Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Are these witnesses that say he quit wearing the toupee after the hijacking, the same witnesses who remember that he skipped out on Thanksgiving dinner the weekend of the hijacking? Also, Ckret shot down the idea of Cooper wearing a toupee earlier in the forum. He basically said that no one mentioned that they thought he was wearing one. Much like I have a hard time with someone having colored contacts in 1971, I also have a hard time believing that Cooper could have worn toupee in 1971 and it went completely unnoticed, except by Mr. Mitchell, who was only a casual observer and had no reason whatsoever to remember anything about Cooper. After listening to Mitchell's interview given to the WSHM, I suspect that Mitchell was more than just a casual observer. He admitted he was a little confused that Cooper was taking ALL the attention of Tina. He looked and studied Cooper. I am not saying I think like a guy, however in his interview it is evident that Mitchell looked at Cooper and compared his physical features to himself. He was looking for a reason this young, attractive flight attendant would be attracted to this old man in his 40's. I can say women do this when they see a good looking guy with an average women..."the what does she got that I do not" way of thinking. Listening to the interview, he does not confirm Cooper had a toupee. He was attempting to describe his hair and appearance. It is unfortunate he was cut off by the museum staff and his thoughts about it were never explained fully. Here is the WSHM page with the link to Mitchell's interview. http://collections.washingtonhistory.org/details.aspx?id=122559 Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Many sources say the first commercially available colored contact lenses debuted in the 1980s. Soft contacts were introduced in 1971 but colored ones didnt show up in the market until the 1980s. I've tried to find proof that colored hard contact lenses were available in 1971 but havent found anything definitive. Douglas Durham, an AIM infiltrator and FBI informant, was rumored to have used brown contact lenses in the 1970s to conceal his blue eyes and look like a Native American, but I cant find convincing proof or exact dates: http://www.dickshovel.com/dur.html Can anyone prove that brown colored contact lenses were available in 1971? I hope Snowman and other sleuths will take the challenge. 377 I found Sheridan's Google+ .....look at his "story". https://plus.google.com/114596102747766314935/about Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/04/16/don_draper_to_become_d_b_cooper_in_mad_men_finale_a_skyjacking_expert_weighs.html A recent article about the Mad Men DB Cooper plot. Geoffrey Gray was interviewed for this article (Geoffrey posted this on Facebook). Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Robert, I don't know how much clearer I can be. I believe that Marla believes her story, just as I believe the others are all sincere in their beliefs. I don't believe any of the currently named suspects are DB Cooper. I also don't see how you can take exception to my statement that you made up a story. I watched Decoded and read your book and nobody goes on the record saying "Kenny is the hijacker", much less how. As far as Geestman goes, it sounds like a lot of "he said, she said". The whole first part of your book is a scenario of how the DB Cooper jump went down. How is that not making up a story? I think there is a disclaimer before the jump scene saying it's a theory based on the available evidence. Of course, at that time (3+ years ago) we thought Geestman may have gone to Paradise Point. Later, we found out he had property in Oakville, and that's where he stored the trailer he bought six weeks prior to the hijacking. Just because no one confessed to being involved, doesn't mean they weren't, you know. The case against KC and Geestman is mostly circumstantial, and has some additional support if you look at Geestman's lies and how those lies are all about distancing himself from either the hijacking, or KC's financial transactions the year after the hijacking. The Decoded episode here ---->https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02WxlT8q8HA I do not see a disclaimer explaining a theory/hypothesis in the Decoded episode. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Robert, I don't know how much clearer I can be. I believe that Marla believes her story, just as I believe the others are all sincere in their beliefs. I don't believe any of the currently named suspects are DB Cooper. I also don't see how you can take exception to my statement that you made up a story. I watched Decoded and read your book and nobody goes on the record saying "Kenny is the hijacker", much less how. As far as Geestman goes, it sounds like a lot of "he said, she said". The whole first part of your book is a scenario of how the DB Cooper jump went down. How is that not making up a story? +1 Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

It would not matter. Your cell phone would be in airplane mode. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

I posted: RMB surmises: My entire post was just a reflection of you using an alias to friend Marla and "dig" up info to post here. I did not bring up YOUR screenshot of Marla's Facebook to hear all about her again. The post I put out there was your screenshot with the name Jane Smith as Marla's "friend". It is disconcerting, as you make it all about you......on everything. When it is convenient and suits your ramblings, you twist it around and hit hard on others. Just because Marla and I are friends on Facebook does not mean I believe her story. We would have all had a better chance to ask her questions because she came to this forum and then was run off. I was trying to make the following point: She accepted EVERYONE that sent her a friend request, but obviously did not accept YOU, Robert M Blevins. I never said I did not like you. You, again, are making assumptions. You may think I am defending her or believe all liars because I clicked a button on Facebook, or noticed your screenshots using Jane Smith as your alter-ego. More assumptions. Just because people debate or disagree with you, does not necessarily indicate people do not like you personally. I have never met you in person and have not made that determination. I met a few from this forum in November 2013. Met Shutter in January 2014 and 377 in June of 2012. I am sure the online version of me is much different than what they expected when they met me in person. If you use dialog on this forum as a precursor to how relationships in the real world may be, you would not be liked by anyone who asked you a question, disagreed with your theories, or tell you repeatedly that you "share" or "re-share" more information than needed to make your point. Then, when asked for information about KC, you do not have enough relevant information that would make or break KC as a suspect; such as the investigation of Geestman as a co-conspirator. If they did the deed together, what significant life changes did Geestman make? If Geestman was 50/50 in this crime, why didn't he loan his own family member the money that KC supposedly did? Did he buy a new home? Is he a wealthy man who invested his money in stock, coins, etc? Watching Geestman and watching his body language during the decoded episode indicates volumes of any involvement he may have had! Personally, if you looked up financial information on Geestman to substantiate KC as a suspect, it wouldn't get you very far. Right now all you have is "he said, she said". I know you claim you are done investigating these people, but your investigation into KC is not full circle and never will be complete without information about his "partner/co-conspirator". You may be perceived differently if you approached the case from all angles and investigated BOTH SUSPECTS thoroughly. Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

And sometimes, while you troll profiles on Facebook, you like to be called Jane....Jane Smith. http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=138986 Yes...that's right. I used that ID to take screenshots of Marla Cooper's Facebook page right at the time she went public. It was a fair amount of work. You see, Vicki...while everyone else was sucking up to her and the FBI was promoting her in the media as a 'viable witness,' no one here - or at the FBI - had the common sense to go to the one place where people post up the most self-serving shit they will usually do on the internet... Their Facebook page. I found out a few things. She was only trying to make a book deal, and based on lies at that. She told people the FBI would be closing the case soon, according to Eng. They haven't, and he never said that...I checked with the Seattle office. And other things. People on this thread check up and research things on me (and everyone else around here) all the time. I'm no different. You have to remember about Marla. She claimed comics on the wall. She said her family was all there. She gave a detailed scenario on how the hijacking went down, including the getaway. Problem was, no one in her family would back a single bit of her story. They still don't. She made fools out of the Seattle FBI. Because of HER, they aren't saying much publicly anymore. Pre-Marla, they even returned peoples' phone calls when they had Cooper-related questions. Now you are lucky to get an answering Email. Marla caused that. She hurt everyone who has, or is currently investigating the Cooper case. That is a fact. And when I was done I never used the Jane ID again. You may as well see the remainder of the screenshots again...

And sometimes, while you troll profiles on Facebook, you like to be called Jane....Jane Smith. http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=138986 Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs

Farflung's take (and poster) regarding Hugh Hefner. lol , I do miss FF. Me too! I was reminiscing! Melvin Luther Wilson - Missing Person since September 1971: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QLnFvk8Fs