Remster

Members
  • Content

    23,696
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by Remster

  1. Hmmm wonder why that might be Well, you are the one who interprets all my posts this way. Quite wrongly, might I add. Oh, get a room you 2 already! Remster
  2. So Charlie Sheen isn't sexy? Yucky. He scares the hell outta me. plus +1 I feel like I gotta run to the gyno for a STD test and antibiotics when I see him on television. How can a guy like him NOT have something catchy???!!! Hey. Be nice to Charlie. He only has extramarital sex with paid porn stars who, I am sure, get frequent STD tests. Well, them, and his ex wife. At the same time. I mean, he's not that bad... Remster
  3. From some one who didnt even know what the trial was about. I'll pass. So - in otherwords you lack the courage to answer. The more you insult me, the more it shines on who you are. Carry on. PS: if someone who knows more about this than Clint wants to have an honest discussion, post here and let me know you posted via PM, and I'll answer here. But really, Clint, before you attack someone, at least read up on the issue. I'm done with Clint's attempts at trolling. Remster
  4. From some one who didnt even know what the trial was about. I'll pass. Remster
  5. Which war was the US fighting in East Africa in 98? The one not relative to this discussion. But nice straw man. Huh? The guy is tried for charges relative to the bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, and it's not relative? WTF? I am glad that you agree with the verdict and that he will be able to be released in 10 years or so. But terrorism is terrorism, he should have been tried by a military tribunal. And you're the one who called a straw man?! BAWAAAAAHAAAA! I noticed that you didn't argue against my assumtion of your agreeing with the verdict. There's nothing to argue about. You obviously do not know even the vaguest details of this case, like, you know, that it was relative to the bombings in TZ and KN in 98. Why should I bother debating it with you? Remster
  6. Which war was the US fighting in East Africa in 98? The one not relative to this discussion. But nice straw man. Huh? The guy is tried for charges relative to the bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, and it's not relative? WTF? I am glad that you agree with the verdict and that he will be able to be released in 10 years or so. But terrorism is terrorism, he should have been tried by a military tribunal. And you're the one who called a straw man?! BAWAAAAAHAAAA! Remster
  7. Which war was the US fighting in East Africa in 98? The one not relative to this discussion. But nice straw man. Huh? The guy is tried for charges relative to the bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, and it's not relative? WTF? Remster
  8. Which war was the US fighting in East Africa in 98? Remster
  9. So it IS the 'oriental' thing... Grant worked on props & special effects for quite a few movies while he was with Industrial Light & Magic...maybe THAT'S why they wanted him...his QUALIFICATIONS. Who the heck is Scotty...I don't really watch that much TV. Scotty was on the 1st batch of helpers. She was a tattooed, cute looking welder. Swapping her to Grant for marketing reason would make absolutely no sense. I thought that was the girl they brought in while Kerry was away on maternity leave? I remember a very talented redhead that knew her way around a welder! It appears that you are confused. Remster
  10. So it IS the 'oriental' thing... Grant worked on props & special effects for quite a few movies while he was with Industrial Light & Magic...maybe THAT'S why they wanted him...his QUALIFICATIONS. Who the heck is Scotty...I don't really watch that much TV. Scotty was on the 1st batch of helpers. She was a tattooed, cute looking welder. Swapping her to Grant for marketing reason would make absolutely no sense. Remster
  11. Well, he did mention Muslims... Remster
  12. The people at that DZ obviously don't know any better. Some experienced jumpers should go there and teach them a few things. yes, that was sarcasm... :-p Remster
  13. Shame that it's completely lost on some. Remster
  14. Blasphemy! There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit. Wow. I was going to type the exact same thing, but didnt expect YOU to beat me to it! Remster
  15. You really think the cuts wont results in people being laid-off? I realize that how the puzzle is set up, but when you cut major spending, it will impact the workforce. If it was only that easy.... Remster
  16. The answer is going to be "I just posted it for discussion" Wendy P. Oh, I see... You're one of those liberals who wants to stop open discussion of the issue. Remster
  17. It's a fact, Bill. Don't you know what a fact is? Remster
  18. BAWAAAHAAAAA!!!!!!! Hey remster your rig is almost due for repack, just send it to me no charge! I rest my case! Remster
  19. And if they can come up with one comment that was made during their employment that show a potential for discrimination, they have a case (winnable or not is debatable, but courts will hear them), regardless if they have been given a reason for their termination or not. Look, I'm just telling it as it is in real life when managing people and working for a company that can be a target for suits. Remster
  20. See, Rhys: THAT is a dig! Remster
  21. AZ is a right to work state. Yet, to fire someone, you still need to cover your ass since some statute are federal. Remster
  22. The original aim of TARP funds was to buy the toxic asset that came from the bundling of various investments (mostly mortgages) into secondary and tertiary vehicles that became impossible to track. Had banks and government been able to identify those, the money spent to acquire those vehicles would have been gone for ever. Because it was impossible to use these funds that way, a good portion of the TAPR funds were used to prop up the banking and auto industry by direct investment. TARP never was meant to be a loan. It was used as one. You can thank the guy who inherited the mess for doing so. Remster