-
Content
135 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Community Reputation
0 NeutralJump Profile
-
Home DZ
Perris
-
License
Student
-
Number of Jumps
2
-
Thought I'd pop my head in here to tell you it's Britney Spears' "Womanizer" video. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
That was frickin' awesome! "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
Those that said 90mph, check your math: Assuming the track is 30mi. long (for easy math) your driver has covered 60 miles, the first half in an hour, and the second half in 20 minutes. That's 60 miles in 80 minutes, or 45mph. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
The length of the track does not matter. The driver averaged 2 minute miles for X miles. After another X miles, the driver needs to have averaged 1 minute miles for 2X miles. Therefore, he needs to do 0 minute miles for the second lap. So freakflyer9999 is right. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
Since you asked, Time is Running Out (Muse). Although, now it's changed to Old Man (Neil Young). And since I took so long to find that video, now I'm on Rodeo Clowns (Jack Johnson). "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
I wouldn't expect him to explore every religion as that's impossible. Also as a U.S. movie I would expect him to focus on religions that are popular here. Too bad they go for the cheap laugh too often. I still look forward to seeing it though. Thanks for updating us. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
Do extremely religious people piss you off?
bjjman replied to skittles_of_SDC's topic in Speakers Corner
Refer back to post 128. That's a month ago and I've made my point. Moving on with life now... "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein -
As someone who's bitter because I've missed the pictures I've got to point out the irony in what you're telling him to do vs. your sig line: And right below that: edited to add smiley "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
Do extremely religious people piss you off?
bjjman replied to skittles_of_SDC's topic in Speakers Corner
Sorry God, I didn't realize you were watching the thread. My apologies. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein -
There is something wrong with you. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
Fuck yeah!!! To the OP: Tonic "If You Could Only See." edited to answer the OP "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
Do extremely religious people piss you off?
bjjman replied to skittles_of_SDC's topic in Speakers Corner
Got it. Though you seem a little confused. If they are mutally exclusive, then only one can be correct, but not the other. It does not quite mean "there'd be zero overlap" as that implies they could coexist. You also somewhat contradict yourself in that you imply quite possibly zero overlap ("in other words there's very little, if any, overlap"), and then in the following sentence state "...there'd be zero overlap - which I don't think is true." "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein -
Do extremely religious people piss you off?
bjjman replied to skittles_of_SDC's topic in Speakers Corner
Didn't you hear? The church apologized recently. It's all okay now. In all seriousness, I don't see where your point is relevant to mine. I never said the two don't cross paths, I was making the point that they each exist to answer different questions. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein -
And therein lies the reason for your sweeping generalization about living off $30k/year while having so much extra for savings. Your figures are 1/3 of the rent that I'm familiar with. A decent place around me is more like $1500/month. Can you really get a decent place in Dallas for $500/month? That's crazy. And no, moving to Dallas is not the answer. For most people that would mean starting over putting them in even more of a bind. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein
-
Okay, $2500/month, let's say roughly $1675 after taxes (just ballpark). After rent there's not much left to live on for the rest of the month. How the hell do you plan for that? Not eat? Skip rent? Live by candlelight? Move in with Mom and Dad? That sounds like bad planning to me. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Albert Einstein