Hoolzen

Yepp, I guess that`s a good option if you don`t use the remotes, otherwise you have to deal with too different remotes, which could be a bit annoying :) Even better might be waiting for the AS200, which can be operated with the same remote as the AZ1. with both sonys the setup would be around an inch less in width compared to a gopro...

Ok UPDATE! I`m quite pissed, the AZ1 is _useless_ for dual use. I bought two an tested, first impression was great, for video use it`s really nice, remote works better than gopro etc... But when it comes to photo mode, Sony... argh... 11,9 mpixel works in single shot mode but when it comes to simple "1 pic per second" mode the AZ1 reduces the quality to HD (2mpixel)... No chance of changing this! As video device really nice, two cams in vid/photo config - forgett it... I asked at Sony and there is no update likely to be released to change this... why not? Because the more expensive AS200,which is supposed to be released in march is obviously able to.... thx sony...

Nailed it. urgh, details?

I somehow don`t get the point? simply put it on a metal base (or case) with the tripod screw and place this on a quick mount onthe glove?

Hey guys, is anybody using two sony AZ1 ( or AS100 ) for handycam with a remote control? Questions are: - can you start both cameras via remote control in their specific mode? so one starts in photo mode and the other one in video mode? - photos are taken 1 every second, right? - are there any major disadvantages ( in comparison to dual gopro which I had for a year) wich makes them useless for dual handycam use? thanks for your input guys. thought it fits in here better than in the camera forum, sorry if wrong. :) add: I do not need the screen on the remote. it`s mounted on my helmet, can`t see it anyway. I use the remote to hold the arm straight and prevent starting and stopping the sequence directly in the passengers nose...

Sadly enough, your wrong....... so then ?