dweeb

Gingrich says war on terror 'phony' Former speaker says energy independence is key By BOB DEANS The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Published on: 08/03/07 Washington — Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Thursday the Bush administration is waging a "phony war" on terrorism, warning that the country is losing ground against the kind of Islamic radicals who attacked the country on Sept. 11, 2001. A more effective approach, said Gingrich, would begin with a national energy strategy aimed at weaning the country from its reliance on imported oil and some of the regimes that petro-dollars support. "None of you should believe we are winning this war. There is no evidence that we are winning this war," the ex-Georgian told a group of about 300 students attending a conference for collegiate conservatives. Gingrich, who led the so-called Republican Revolution that won the GOP control of both houses of Congress in 1994 midterm elections, said more must be done to marshal national resources to combat Islamic militants at home and abroad and to prepare the country for future attack. He was unstinting in his criticism of his fellow Republicans, in the White House and on Capitol Hill. "We were in charge for six years," he said, referring to the period between 2001 and early 2007, when the GOP controlled the White House and both houses of Congress. "I don't think you can look and say that was a great success." .... "I believe we need to find leaders who are prepared to tell the truth ... about the failures of the performance of Republicans ... failed bureaucracies ... about how dangerous the world is," he said when asked what kind of Republican he would back for president. http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/2007/08/03/newt0803.html

More logical fallacies courtesy of Billvon. Has it occurred to you that this is basically a non-issue, that one (or maybe few) little lefties are pushing to create a dustup? I quoting you to get on record that you think there is nothing wrong with child molestation. You should work on your reading comprehension. Sorry, chief, but you're the one who thinks that child molestation is a "non-issue". Do you have children? If so, perhaps the North Carolina Child Protective Services would be interested in your point of view. I'm sure they'll think that child molestation is a "non-issue" as well.

Great family values they have there.

More logical fallacies courtesy of Billvon. Has it occurred to you that this is basically a non-issue, that one (or maybe few) little lefties are pushing to create a dustup? I quoting you to get on record that you think there is nothing wrong with child molestation.

This is just the Republicans finally admitting that Gore was right and that they should have listened.

Nice PA... now, take a look at the proven "lean to the left" of the national media - that is definitely a factor in your "proven list"... Your perception of a 'liberal media' clouds your ability to see the truth. [url=http://www.armchairsubversive.org/]Here's[/url] the link for the source of the list. If you click on the names of each of these fine, upstanding Republicans, you'll get a link to the articles from around the world that expose them for the pedophiles that they are. Why are you such a staunch defender of pedophiles?

These letters are going to show which Republicans begged to have Scooter's sentence mitigated rather than him being punished according to the law. Cool - does that mean that people can write in and get Sandy Burgler re-tried for stealing classified documents, too? Why are Republicans so hell-bent on destroying the constitution? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_jeopardy

I have a problem with those who call themselves 'Christian' yet don't follow the words of their bible. I have a problem with those who want creationism taught in schools and evolution removed. Other than those, I don't really care what they think or what they believe in. So you're indifferent on the gay marriage, abortion, prayer in school, or separation of church and state? Gay marriage? Why not? Why should straights be the only ones who suffer? Abortion? I don't have a uterus, so I don't have a dog in that fight. Prayer in school? Well, the Supreme Court already shot that down. Separation of Church & State? That was written into the constitution. You may have been around back then but I wasn't born yet. Care to divulge what your views are on these?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1322671659854901905

These letters are going to show which Republicans begged to have Scooter's sentence mitigated rather than him being punished according to the law. How does going to bat for Libby prove they value the GOP over national security? Was Libby convicted of breaking national security laws? If you don't know what the CIA leak case was about, maybe you should check with those ultra-liberals at Christian Science Monitor. They've done a great job explaining it in easy-to-understand terms. http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1028/p03s01-uspo.html

These letters are going to show which Republicans begged to have Scooter's sentence mitigated rather than him being punished according to the law.

I have a problem with those who call themselves 'Christian' yet don't follow the words of their bible. I have a problem with those who want creationism taught in schools and evolution removed. Other than those, I don't really care what they think or what they believe in.

Looks like we may be finding out soon.

Noted.

WASHINGTON - Confronted with strong opposition to his Iraq policies, President George W. Bush decides to interpret public opinion his own way. Actually, he says, people agree with him. Democrats view the November elections that gave them control of Congress as a mandate to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq. They are backed by evidence; election exit poll surveys by The Associated Press and television networks found 55 percent saying the U.S. should withdraw some or all of its troops from Iraq. Bush says Democrats have it all wrong: the public does not want the troops pulled out - they want to give the military more support in its mission. "Last November, the American people said they were frustrated and wanted a change in our strategy in Iraq," he said April 24, ahead of a veto showdown with congressional Democrats over their desire to legislation a troop withdrawal timeline. "I listened. Today, General David Petraeus is carrying out a strategy that is dramatically different from our previous course." http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,137382,00.html?ESRC=army-a.nl What the fuck?