• Content

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

  • Feedback

  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by DougH

  1. We are just about ready to kick off the New England season in my area. It looks like most DZ's are going reschedule safety day, or offer an online stream of some sort.

    As far as actual opening days I haven't seen any flat out closures, and I don't think you will see that unless it is government mandated. I have a bad feeling that this is going be a tough year for owners,and full time skydivers.

  2. 17 hours ago, hcsvader said:



    Anyway I'm literally sitting here watching Netflix with a bottle of JD chain smoking cigarettes eating McDs with a point of meth on the table just having recently returned home from Asia.


    Wonder what I'll die from?

    Well smoking and obesity are two risk factors for having a much more serious covid-19 infection, so I guess it is just a roll of the dice.

    I heard that local police stations are testing meth for covid-19 because it is one of the substances that has been shown to be contaminated. Make sure you tweak safe, go get it checked out.

  3. On 3/9/2020 at 8:29 AM, sfzombie13 said:

      another jumper said that was an old timer attitude and that doesn't matter, that separation is gotten by delaying between groups.  

    I started out by calling this other jumper an idiot, and they probably are, but the question is what do you mean about tracking up jump run, and what did they think you meant.

    It sounds like they were referring, not to break-off, when you track enough to get minimum separation from the jumpers on your group, and instead literally tracking up jump run.

    If that is what they meant then they should know that a premature canopy opening, or something else out of the ordinary like a canopy malfunction on opening will eat up that vertical separation from group delay in a nano second. Combine that with your movement relative to the other groups because of tracking, and you can get yourself a cozy coffin, or a rad wheelchair.

    If they mean tracking at the end of a jump, well yes, you track relative to your group center, and you should track just long enough to get the separation. IF you left proper delay between groups, and the group order was correct, then that type of tracking for separation shouldn't be an issue and your focus should be on a heading that gets you the best separation from your group.

    • Like 2

  4. I am not going to do much other than wash my hands and keep them away from my face. I have a newborn at home so I was doing that anyway.

    I did buy some N99 respirator masks for the slight chance that it becomes prevalent in my area and I need to be out in crowded places buying things. Staying home would be the best option if that did happen, but babies need things. I will use them for home improvement projects after this all blows over.

    The kid is supplemented with formula in addition to nursing so I may stock up on some extra formula. It will get used anyway, and that will reduce my need to be out and about in the slight chance that it ends up being common around me.

  5. I read in an article that in interviews he openly admitted that the rockets were totally unnecessary and were only meant for publicity purposes with the hopes of getting future funding for another crack pot idea called the ralloon, part rocket part balloon, that he intended to take up to the edge of space.

  6. Millions of dollar invested in a racing team and a driver could be pissed away with one twisted ankle. Instructor could fuck up, student could fuck up.

    I think that they are well within their rights to ban skydiving for their team members.

  7. The USPA group member affiliation means nothing in terms of safety. It only shows that they paid their annual dues. There are no inspections or other mechanisms to actually evaluate the safety of those operations. They could lose the designation, but that is long after a crash or a student dying because of poor instructing/student gear/etc.

    Your instructor made a good comment about aircraft maintenance being one of the areas cut back on, but I think that is more of a symptom of a ineffective DZO. Low funds and poor maintenance are both symptoms. A safety focused DZO isn't going to fly the plane when it isn't in the right condition, even if the money is tight and they have to send the tandems home. A smart DZO is setting aside the right reserves for maintenance so that won't happen in the first place.

    But MX isn't the only area of risk, smaller DZ's may also have green jump pilots that are earning their hours. I think that is of at least equal risk, because a good pilot can get you down safely when the rubber band breaks, and a poor pilot might panic and stall you in at the end of the runway. It isn't uncommon to have relatively new pilots with operations flying smaller single prop planes that aren't turbines. They should meet comercial hour requirments but sometimes just barely. The DZO needs to bridge the gap by getting new jump pilots good training from a more experinced jump pilot, and making sure that emergencies like engine outs are drilled. 

    When you get to bigger more expensive jump planes the insurance companies start demanding more hours and training.

    Your best way to start evaluating DZ safety is your eyes and ears.

    - What is the condition of the dropzone on the ground, does everything look well maintained?

    - How does the student gear look. Is it nice and new, or does it look beat to shit?

    - Do you get a good safety briefing, or are they super casual about having a new jumper visiting. What about inspecting your log book and your gear, do they give everything a good look, or do they not seem to care.

    - Ask them about the pilot, how long has he been flying jumpers. If you ask nicely you should get a nice response.

    - How is the plane loaded. Do the instructors and jumpers communicate well, work out exit order, or does everyone just pile on the plane.

    - Are there seatbelts in the plane, and are all the jumpers using them? I won't jump at a DZ without seatbelts. And you should really start to question when people don't use the ones in the plane and no one seems to care.

    - What do they do about the landing pattern. Is it set, is it discussed, or does everyone act like it is their own personal landing area and land however they want, it which ever direction they want. Are people swooping in the middle of the pattern.


    Safety comes from the deliberate actions and the tone set by the DZO or club governance. If they make safety their key focus everyone else will follow. If fun jumpers and staff aren't being safe what kind of tone is the leadership setting, and what else isn't getting done?

    • Like 1

  8. 16 hours ago, said:

    Cheers mate!
    I thought CF2 is a fully elliptical canopy 

    Yeah I've sought out few canopy courses/camps and I've already spoken with few coaches but I just want to get more opinions/recommendations from other more advanced jumpers. It doesn't mean I'll buy it though

    I did few jumps on Sabre2 and I found it very similar to Safire2
    Katana huh? What about the openings? Heard it's usually pretty hard and the canopy itself is not very predictable. Is that true?  


    Being fully eliptical matters much less than the recovery arc. The older stilleto is a fully eliptical canopy, but it is horrible for HP landings. You want canopies with steeper recovery arcs that allow for higher longer dives that give you time to make adjustments. You don't get that with a Crossfire2 a Safire or a Pilot.

    I asked about coaching because I am suprised that your previous canopy selections haven't been mentioned by those coaches. Were you just getting general canopy coaching, or was it coaching that was focused on HP landings? I get the feeling that you are learning the swooping part as you go, which isn't the safest or most efficient way to go.

    My head is sometimes stuck in older gear selections and I forgot to mention the new Fluid Wing canopies. I have been hearing good things about the Gangster as canopy for learning how to swoop, but it isn't first hand experince.

    Might be worth tracking down a dealer to see if you can get a demo for all of these potential canopies before you make another purchase.

  9. Safires and CF2's are both terrible canopies to learn to swoop on due to their short recovery arcs. 

    I don't know your experince beyond it just being 600 jumps so I don't want to go out of a limb and recommend something smaller or fully eliptical, but I will say that a sabre 2 in the same size as your crossfire is going to be better to learn on.

    I have seen solid progressions that went from a smaller sabre 2, to a same size katana and then on to a velo.

    Have you sought out any actual canopy coaching? A canopy coach would be the best place to get some advice on wings.

  10. If there was a club at one point there may be existing bylaws out there? I wonder if the old club was actually registered as an official organization with the secretary of state? Is the school a for profit organization with a DZO?

  11. You could reach out to sucessful active clubs.

    Jumptown in Orange MA

    Connecticut Parachutists Inc. in Ellington CT

    And I thought Orange VA was also a club, but I haven't jumped there in well over a decade.

    What are you trying to accomplish? Stand-alone club opening at a new airport? DZO looking to sell to a group of fun jumpers?

  12. 2 hours ago, dudeman17 said:

     But with modern canopies, the problem isn't a hard landing, but faster forward speed. For that, the slide-in may well be the better option.

    Depends on the type of jumper.

    A slide-in for students is not the better or safer option. Legs are more durable, and telling students to slide is inviting them to land on their less durable tailbone. Bad for the spine when things aren't perfect.

    Additionally students often have a more vertical aspect to their landing thanks to things like high flares. They aren't aware enough to evaluate when one approach is appropriate versus the other, so they should only be taught the PLF.


  13. If I had to sterotype across gender and race  I would say that all of female Indian students I take perform excelently, and much much better on average than the males in their groups. Not that it matters gender or race, doing the opposite of what you competently instruct is just what some tandem students do.

    We have a reasonable weight limit, so smaller instructors don't end up having to take the 285 couch dwellers to stay under system weight because we don't take them at all.

    I do think there should be some equity here, all the instructors should be able to take any of the students that walk in the door unless there are special indications, like a disabled passanger who should be paired with the most experienced instructor.

    I understand having a period for new instructors where you don't pair them with students at the edge of the weight limit, or who have a huge height diferential but eventually the kid gloves should come off and they should manage the same students as everyone else. Just my opinion.


  14. I am 5'6, and I make it work. I have seen smaller instructors.

    Would it be easier at 6 foot tall and lanky sure, but you can still handle most students.

    It is harder, you need to plan and fly your exits correctly, compared to the 6'2 bean pole who has much more room to get away with mediocre exits and poor student instruction. But so what, regardless of your height or experince you shouldn't just toss yourself  and the student out of the plane with no consideration given to the exit. Also as you get more experience you will have to work harder to shoot handicam footage.

    I think strength matters very much. If you are short and on the weaker side I would give pause and focus on getting strong.

    You should be able to fly and flare unassisted with the heaviest student your DZ allows after a long day of jumps. You should be able to deal with the uncoordinated student that is pushing against you as you make your way to the door. If your dz has a slide up door like a caravan or an otter you need to be able to operate the door with a student on the front unassisted. You should be able to get you and a student up off the foor from a seated position if you have a load where there isn't enough room on the seat/bench. Just a few strength criteria that I am making up in my mind.

    All of the things above can be made easier using smart techniques, but everything is easier when you are stronger.

    I can squat or deadlift my biggest possible student, that is far from winning any strengh records, but it makes getting through a day way easier.

  15. 23 hours ago, evh said:

    A black dot on your goggles or visor works perfectly well for anything from tandems to bigways.

    I really do not understand the reason for ringsights. All I hear is "if you are a professional, you should have one". I could be wrong, but so far I have not heard of any real benefits.


    You are able to compose shots better. They allow to you properly aim the helmet regardless of how the helmet might shift on your head, and how you are angled. That is compared to the orange plastic lolipops.

    Compared to a dot on a visor or goggles they do all of the above, plus it doesn't ever shift which can't be said about goggles.

    And I agree, you don't need it, especially in the age of people shooting with two super wide gopros, but I think if you give a good flier the option it will bring out the best in their product for tandem videos. 

    For outside still photos of formations it is night and day. It takes you from just pointing at the formation and holding down the tongue switch to being able to precisely compose the shots.

  16. It all depends on your use of the camera helmet. Is it going to be used only for outside video? Leave the ring sight on the ground for inside video.

    Is it going to be used to film fun jumpers, or are there paying customers? You are a pro if you are getting paid, and my thought processes is professional jumps deserve a professional setup.

    Video and still? What are you using for video? What size lense on the still camera?