vortexring

Members
  • Content

    2,577
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by vortexring

  1. Not really, but perhaps somewhat more believable than the recent annual appraisal disguised as a summit. Welcome to the dark ages. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  2. I can only imagine he didn't have enough money to tell enough people how great he is and how bad the others are... 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  3. Despite the satirical statement, money often trumps everything. I think that also explains the real answer to the suppression. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  4. I'm now truly horrified for missing the opportunity to vote for this genius! Next time! 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  5. She's shocked how many voted for herself? You're demonstrating quite an active imagination. Which I fully support. It's healthy. Just this week she's covering up the terrorist connection of the Saudi's and forming a government with the spawn of Ian Paisley. Very true, but you're clearly forgetting to take into account how much money our country can make from the House of Saud, which therefore negates any of their terrorist connections (see Qatar as a reasonable example of deflection). However, she also hasn't been attending the funerals of any recently deceased terrorists. True, however she has just given a bunch of thinly veiled terrorists the casting vote in British politics. Having just read his manifesto, I'm with lord bucket head. Has she? Despite their electorate, I'm not quite convinced. On more serious note, can you bullet Buckethead's manifesto? I might just join you Quote 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  6. I am giving you a round of applause Brilliant. Thanks. It was either the badger or the chap called Edgar from the original MenInBlack movie.
  7. She's shocked how many voted for herself? You're demonstrating quite an active imagination. Which I fully support. It's healthy. Just this week she's covering up the terrorist connection of the Saudi's and forming a government with the spawn of Ian Paisley. Very true, but you're clearly forgetting to take into account how much money our country can make from the House of Saud, which therefore negates any of their terrorist connections (see Qatar as a reasonable example of deflection). However, she also hasn't been attending the funerals of any recently deceased terrorists. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  8. Her inexperience in comparison to Corbyn's was something her team hadn't quite anticipated. Their own attempts at a manifesto were also about as convincing as the Green Parties shambolic effort. Despite May often appearing something akin to a badger struggling with its human disguise, Corbyn (for me) still convinces around as much as a Sunday Sport headline. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  9. She's shocked how many voted for herself? You're demonstrating quite an active imagination. Which I fully support. It's healthy. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  10. I think she's shocked so many voted for the protesting weasel-faced terrorist sympathiser. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  11. Yet he's no Honey Badger. Far from it. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  12. Thanks for that Grimmie. Your explanation reminds me a little of a certain socialist politician over here, who seems to be working his popularity around a general (and national) political apathy, whilst massively ill-suited to the role as opposition leader. I think it'd be easy to claim there's more important things than spicy hot sauce, as you put it, but then it seems I'd also be wrong. Cheers. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  13. In context, I dunno. A majority from the 2nd March indicated a preference for Trump, which at least indicates some people here might vote for him. I'm just curious as to why. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  14. Well, thanks for sharing it, nevertheless. It remains beyond me why he could possibly be a choice, whatever ones political affiliation. IMO Trump's potential for disaster seems to transcend any well wished desire for a Republican majority. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  15. What an encouraging endorsement for those on the fence. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  16. Yes Quade, you're correct: SC is not a representative sample of the US population as a whole, so I assume you'll perhaps help me address and question the nation as whole? Or can I just ask the question here? I'm only asking - at best - for a couple of Trump voters opinions to be honest. Thanks for your opinion on the matter though - appreciate it. I gather you think some Republican voters are pretty hardcore Republican, and will therefore vote for their candidate whoever he or she might be? That makes some kind of sense. But it also indicates (potentially) a lack of rationality, on behalf of the voter. What if the candidate was - weirdly - Obama's long lost twin brother, for example? 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  17. Here's some media based opinions on the chap from several countries in case it might interest you: https://thinkprogress.org/what-newspapers-in-13-countries-are-saying-about-donald-trump-819e632616d2#.grs13epkn http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35702584 A poll here on SC - from around 270+ people - indicates he's considerably more popular for the vote than Hilary. Could someone (who's not insane) please educate me as to why you'd vote for Donald over Hilary? It's a genuine question based around the fairly common - and international - perception he's a bit of a nut-job, whereas Hilary is commonly perceived as being considerably more stable; far more experienced; better for America. The extent of his popularity in America genuinely surprises me. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  18. Right, because that worked so well in Afghanistan. Wait, no - Ok it worked so well in Iraq. Wait, no - Ok it worked so well in.... help me out here? Libya?
  19. News report here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/05/british-people-are-nasty-and-arrogant-says-wwii-flying-ace-chuck/ I was quite surprised reading this, at home in the UK. Especially as it seems more normal for us to be saying such things about them. I wonder what got his goat? 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  20. You forgot two key words... Negatory good buddy. Bear in mind gun nuts are often law abiding citizens themselves prior to committing atrocities. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  21. So you're saying kill the children first? Nope. I'm saying that the solution to gun violence is NOT more guns, any more than the solution to rising CO2 in the atmosphere is more cars burning gasoline. The teacher's likely to be the priority target whether they're assumed to be armed or not. 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  22. If a crazed teacher decides to start shooting people, do you really think a "gun free zone" law will stop them from bringing in a gun? However, if in the remote chance one of these legally armed teachers did go crazy and started shooting, one of the other armed teachers and/or school staff would be able to quickly respond and put a stop to it by whatever means necessary.
  23. One of today's articles describes 3 teachers who put themselves in harm's way. 2 left safety to go towards the sound of shots fired and if we can take on faith what the reporter wrote, were shot execution style. One other blocked the children in a cabinet as was shot for it. Can anyone argue that they would have been worse off armed, rather than sheep walking towards the slaughter? They had no options here, they knew it. They were just trying to buy time for a response, putting the children's well being ahead of their own. I wish they could have had better options than that. I wish they could've had better options too. :( But having armed teachers isn't the solution. What if it transpires one of the armed teachers is a nutter and runs amok? Arm the kids?? 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  24. What's the point if prolific gun ownership is the crux of the problem? Because it isn't the problem. When you start out blinded by reality, anything else that comes from that is pure fantasy. What is the problem then? 'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'
  25. Since prolific gun ownership is not the problem, you have no point What is the problem then please? You mentioned a few things earlier, yet other developed nations suffer exactly the same problems you described, as I pointed out, but without frequent massacres. I believe the other poster proved you incorrect in regards to frequency I believe the other poster has yet to provide the evidence. Whether he does or not, it doesn't detract from the simple fact the high frequency of US massacres. You've still to address my earlier question. Please do so; I'm all ears. You start from a flawed premise. Guns are not the issue Not that you care Well, could you be so kind as to tell me what you believe is the issue then? I actually do care; don't be like that...