carmenc

So the government should be able to arbitrarily clamp down on the ability to do anything that isn't essential? Well d'uh. The internet is a right. No. It is another convenience. What about healthcare? Convenience?

Since your calling a dead man a Liar please post your facts that he lied. You seem to have undeniable proof so lets hear it. As for the defamation lawsuit the judge changed the rules the jury was hung. They should win on appeal. Last I do not believe for a second you even went to see the movie, and if you actually went it was for no other reason then to once again show your anti Americanism. It will always be amazing to me the lack of respect shown to the men and women that make it possible for you to have the freedom have the opinions that you do. Me id prefer to ship you off to Iraq and let you see how far your opinions get you. How does his (or your, or my) freedom depend in any way on the invasion of Iraq?

How many record cold years have there been in the past decade?

Mosey! I LOVE moseying.

So.... what you're saying is that the universe may really be nothing more than some pimply-faced kid's vinegar and baking soda volcano ? I'm good with that. Could be an N-dimensional Monty Python sketch.

It didn't "resemble" the Nazi SS symbol, it was identical. Why are you trying to excuse the inexcusable?

I know a number of Morans. Huge family. Almost certainly pro-life. Not all of them. ourworlds.topcities.com/space1889/stories/sh-moran.html

Northern NJ is nuts! Average home today still costs $400k. It is not a cheap place to live at all! But for now it's home, even though my property tax is $6k Luck you. Mine's $9k.

Something like three hundred posts ago I told you that I agree there is a problem, I just disagree on exactly what the problem is. You think there is a problem with inanimate pieces of metal and plastic. I think there is a problem with violent crime, a problem with our mental health system, and number ofnother problems in our country. I don't think that we have too many rights or that any of them are too widely protected by the government. I'm willing to discuss solutions. It's difficult to discuss them though when youbare incapable of articulating a clear position. I've stated my position many times. It'd be nice if you could do it just once. I haven't seen you suggest a single idea for discussion. Did I miss something?

It's obvious. The climate is changing in ways we don't completely understand.

You didn't use the post as a change of topic, you used it as a response to the ongoing discussion - the whole 'set an example' thing made that clear. Again, nice try. Mike, the expression you are looking for is "red herring", not "strawman".

Has that happened to you, or are you just fear mongering? See you could do a freedom of information act and get the video from the car.... That would tell you if a light was out. But please... Tell me, have you been pulled over for a broken taillight and then arrested for "driving while X"????? I've been pulled over for a traffic offense that wasn't. Advised by attorney not to contest it since she said the judge always believes the cop in a "he said she said" case.

If they are driving, they need to carry a driver's license, just like anyone else. . But according to this: a NM driver's license doesn't count. Which brings us back to: So the state's claim that citizens don't need to carry ID is false, if they look Hispanic and drive in from NM.

What do they currently do to prove their citizenship? After all, the AZ police are already allowed (but not required) to question anyone's legal status. If their driver's license isn't proof that they are in the country legally, then they may want to carry one of the other documents listed. So the state's claim that citizens don't need to carry ID is false, if they look Hispanic and drive in from NM. What do you think might constitute "reasonable suspicion"? A tatoo on the forehead saying "Mexican"?

Never said otherwise, I just asked him to back it with more than a bumper sticker. And you know those types of charges have to be proven in court and are not just accepted. Oh, right. Just try challenging a cop's sworn statement that your brake light was out, or you were doing 33 in a 25 limit, before a municipal court judge.