BIGUN

Congrats, you're trending. :)

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/p8TArslrp3c

I've been trying hard for a couple of days and could not sell any of my cast iron. Guess that's not for me either. Wait . . . you said OnlyFans. Damn, I was trying OnlyPans.

Shit. Guess I'm gonna have to change my plan from "Social Media Influencer."

Trump?!?!?! Is that you?

Now, hold on - let's talk about this . . .

Well, ummmm, about that, are you saying that . . . nevermind

- or not.

That's called "Climate." They're talking about "Climate Change" which leads to "Global Warming." You do realize that a PERMANENT 1 degree change would have a significant impact on the world? The attached link is IMO the single best reference for those who "wish" to understand more of the basics of this impact. https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2865/a-degree-of-concern-why-global-temperatures-matter/ Brent, I'm not going to get into a long circular argument with you. At this point, you have enough info to re-orient your position and pick a new azimuth - or not,

"Cause I said so" is not an effective form of education, And it's my job to go submit FOIA and requests to DHS/DOD to support your position . . . ummm. Not so much.

So, you're googlefu works to own the libs, but not for, "My iPad has stopped letting me copy and paste links." https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=My+iPad+has+stopped+letting+me+copy+and+paste+links

You didn't post the article. You posted an excerpt which illuminated the point you were trying to make.

The "Vested Clause" of the Constitution gives the President the authority. The Supreme Court can override any EO that is not within the scope of the President's powers.

Yeah, but you were being less than forthright on the cause and my suspicion as to why you didn't post the hyperlink to the Reuters' article. There were resource, logistical and regulatory issues for not meeting the financial goals - of which some day-traders will tuck and roll. It's a first quarter report.

Keep in mind that someone, somewhere also calculated the percentage of those that would not comply with the mask mandates, so additional mandates were added. At that time, we did not know what we were facing, how bad it was going to be, if it was natural or manufactured, nor could anyone forecast the extent up to and including the end of human and/or animal life. I had no issue with every arrow in the quiver being used to defend against whatever this "was" to be, mask mandates, social distancing, accelerated vaccines, and lockdowns and will still maintain that the lockdown was a month too short. I am not a science guy, so for those with advanced degrees - we rely on them to guide us. Which they did. Were mistakes made; yes. But, we had to try anything and everything. And, to this day; I look around and think, "We made it through it." ~MINO

Effectiveness of N95 Mask in Preventing COVID-19 Transmission Plus if both parties are wearing masks; the transmitter and the receiver protection is doubled?

I get it, Joe. You want me to vote Dem. Beating that drum in every response isn't really necessary.

Rolling back the clock to a time when women couldn't vote is probably not a good plan.

You m' lady have made THE best logic statement for consideration. Someone came up with this in the 70's - It's all your fault if you don't vote. Well, Joe. It's not. If NOBODY voted there would still be an electoral vote and if they didn't vote, congress would vote. It's all part of the Illuminatus plan to own the world. Ya know, Latin for we be fucked while the light is on.

Retrospectively as in 40-50 years ago as compared with your analysis of the current. I will vote for neither.

Yeah, but they are merely MINO's. :) I'm going to share the following link. I find it interesting that it encompasses poll type/politician/institution in the dropdowns and then reports who did the research and who funded the research. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/joe-biden/ As to your points on JFK vs. Nixon, etc. We all learn by looking back "retrospectively." Unfortunately, that doesn't help in the decision making for future leadership. I've voted for Democrats - admittedly on a local level primarily because they were more fiscally conservative than their republican opponents professed. Anyway, I don't think either team has a good choice and am faced with not voting for a P at all.

No argument - especially on the two examples provided. However, when it comes to the nation's leadership; I'm going to do some research and come to my own conclusions.

Cry havoc . . .

So, we're not boiling frogs anymore?

And, she exiled to Russia and asked Putin to expedite her citizenship after receiving death threats, Uh huh.