Deyan

PdF is pretty much out of business in regards to the sport gear. The 10 years since they've closed doors have already passed, so by law, they no longer have to provide service/spare parts. If your Techno 155 is past 40 repacks, you can try and find a rigger who has permeability tester and is willing to "burn his/her hands" inspecting it. The reason I'm saying that is that to my knowledge PdF has never published the permeability testing protocol. Without it, the person doing the inspection will open him/herself for liability should something goes wrong with that reserve. FYI, the permeability limit set by PdF is 5 CFM.

You are welcome! What I forgot to mention is that the average jumper spends 5-7 years in the sport which means that that rig will have 2-4 owners over its lifetime.

OK Jerry, I'll give you a very broad breakdown on what I would expect. Today I closed my 6000th reserve, so I consider myself experienced enough to have an opinion based on experience. Let's have a look at a brand new H/C system, 9 cell ZP main, and a PDR. The system is going to be used in Central/Northern Europe and it won't be abused with bad landings, packed outside, jumped next to the sea etc. around 200 jumps the kill line will need replacing 400-600 jumps a reline is expected. At the same time, a new PC and risers might be needed and maybe the chest strap will need to be replaced 700-800 jumps a new Dbag will probably be needed and maybe new leg straps and kill line. 1000-1200 jumps second lineset and again maybe PC, risers and chest strap 1500-1600 jumps, the main will probably be done at this point and the overall condition of the harness will be to the point where the MLW and/or reserve risers will need replacing too. If the harness is replaced, the cycle can continue. About 3000-4000 jumps is where the container will be worn out as well. And at that point you can sell it to a CReW jumper and they'll happily double that number! Just joking guys.... kinda. So without too much maintenance, I'd say 1500-1600 jumps is the useful life of a rig. 80-100 jumps a year for the average jumper equals 15-20 years. In those 15-20 years if you pack the reserve every 6 months on the date, and have 2-3 reserve rides, you'll be very close to the reserve needing factory check, so that sums it up I guess. I hope that answers you question.

Although there are a few countries in Europe with that 20 years lifetime of the gear, majorly of countries doesn't have limitations. And because EASA doesn't want regulate skydiving gear (and rightfully so) every country has it's own rules. So pretty much everything you say after "the Europeans" in regards to skydiving gear, will be incorrect.

Just so I'm clear, my idea is to get rid of it and not give it in the hands of some other non government body to be regulated . Like PIA for example. That's gonna be equally bad or even worse!

In the original state that came from the manufacturer?! Probably no more than 500 jumps. After you start replacing stuff, I've seen one with 5500 jumps in 15 years! And to be completely honest, probably the TSO label was the only part that was made at the factory :) ..... Just like the broom from the video above

Rob, What he is referring to is the comfort padding a.k.a Spacer foam is falling apart. I've seen it a few times only on Vortex rigs. Removing that will be equal to rebuilding the rig, which is economically not worth doing. To the OP, there's nothing you can do. Jump it as it is and wash your suit frequently, or burn it. It's just a Vortex.

IMO we should get rid of the TSO altogether. Since you can play games to first get it and then maintain it, what's the purpose of it, other than keeping the door closed for startups with a low budget? It seems a bit of an useless exercise. We will be better off without it. More players on the field will bring innovation faster and at lower cost. Just like the BASE industry. And IMO, the limits in the manual should be the correct ones. The question is, should the manufacturer recall the products with the wrong labels?!

If the Speed 2000 in question is made from the PN1 a.k.a the normal fabric, it will fit. If it's made from the V3 a.k.a low packing volume fabric , it will be too soft.

Two or so years ago I made a joke about the delivery times of UPT. I told a new jumper just after his AFF who wanted to buy his first rig, and he really wanted a Vector: " Go with V308 and PD126, you'll thank me later" He laughed.... Then he went with another brand. 60 + weeks later, he already had done around 400 jumps on his already "old rig" and was looking to downsize to 135 which is the tight fit for V308. We both laughed about the absurdity of their delivery times. If you finish AFF today, you can get a rig with PDR 113 and Valkyrie 75. By the time your rig is ready, you will be ready to jump that combo too

I have so many questions.... Why is weight important to you? For BASE jumping I kinda understand since you will have to hike with it (sometimes for hours). For skydiving though...?! If you want to cut weight from you future rig, forget about stuff like spacer foam, hip/chest rings, Cordura and you'll probably save about 6-700 grams. If the weight is the only factor you are looking at, the undisputed world champion of light weight rigs is a Power Racer. I believe the smallest I ever saw was 275/275 and it was like 6.5 kg with canopies...

I was referring to Vigil's PSB-8 Vigil R&D has confirmed that the electronics worked correctly and fired the cutter, but because of the absence of the knife blade, the closing loop could not be cut.

If it even had a blade...

IMO, it's a combination between the cap size, the side flaps being sewn too far in the corner, the pin cover stiffener too thick and tucked too far in. I've measured 70 mm being tucked in on one of the NexGen sizes. It's ridiculous! Being "freefly friendly" is important, but "reserve deployment friendly" is importanter. Pardon my French Interesting fact is that Aerodyne has 2 cap size RPCs (I believe 5 and 6 inches) and 2 types of cap shapes (flat one and concave), but unlike UPT they haven't published (to my knowledge) a guide which cap size goes into which container size.

Even if they were "full fit", but inside the allowed sizes, that's not supposed to happen.I know the rigger who packed it and I'm willing to bet that the canopies are the correct size, the loop was the correct length and treated with silicon. Now, you can say that the picture doesn't represent "a real life scenario" because the person on the picture doesn't wear the legstraps. To which I would answer, I'll never jump a rig where the reserve deployment depends on how tight you have your legstraps.

Yes. Because they were designed, tested and certified before Sept 2012. OM-7 is 4 years old canopy. If it was TSO tested it would have been C23f. The label says C23d which makes me believe it was a labeling error rather than the canopy actually being TSO certified.

My money is on labeling error. If it was TSO'd, would have been C23f and not "d"

The guy said he will make it. You don't need to remind him every two years....

You are welcome!

As much as I would like to agree with Jerry and BIGUN, the reality is sometimes manufacturer's rigger gets it wrong. For example, the manufacturer is located in a place where the humidity is very low. Low humidity could drastically increase the packing volume. You are jumping in very high humidity. Or, the manufacturer doesn't have hands on experience with certain model/size canopy and their advice is based on "we guess" rather than "we know for sure". And yes, this have happened to me on several occasions with different manufacturers. If I were you, I'd listen to your dealer. That's the person you've chosen to spend your money with and he/or she will be dealing with you if you end up not being happy at the end. With other words, your dealer is more interested in you being happy than the manufacturer. For that manufacturer, you are just a name on a .pdf file. Now I'm curious what rig/canopy combo you are interested in?!

Here are some questions for you. What model was the rig? Does it have a free fly tuck tab on the handle? If yes, was it tucked in? Did you get a proper briefing when you rented it? The reason I'm asking is, most modern rigs will come with some kind of freefly secure handle. Sometimes that handle will require a slightly different angle to be pulled out, or just more force. If you were not aware of it, I can see why you thought you were having a hard pull. Packing the PC in the pocket could also make a difference in the pull force. If I have to make a guess based on your story, I'd say there's nothing wrong with the gear. I spend about 20-30 min briefing people how to check and use the gear they rent from me. I explicitly tell them about the free fly tab and how to avoid a hard pull.

I have them, and can also make you a pair! However, I HIGHLY recommend you get rid of the reversed 3 ring risers. Here's why! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9RHMQZTSGQ

TSO is useless for that exact reason. You could certify something, then change it as many times as you wish as long as you log it as a "minor change". Vector Micron from February 2022 is exact same rig like 2 pinned Wonderhog from 1977 ..... In the eyes of the FAA

How about you are unconscious and your AAD fires..... because of your body position only ONE raiser cover opens.... How would you like a spinning line twist under your reserve?

What about the lockups after the ripcord pull? How is the cutter relocating going to fix those? Are you planing on changing the RPC cap to concave in order to accommodate for the extra thickness of the cutter? The rigs after the modification look like shit by the way.