Yes, This is a post to gather information on preferences regarding F111 and ZP pilot chutes. This stems from what we have seen as a widespread move to ZP pc's, possibly following the popularity of ZP canopies. ZP canopies are certainly main stream and have taken over the sport canopy market for the most part. But is it a better pilot chute? We have discussed this with several manufacturers and have gathered some information we would like to share: * Due to the porosity of the fabric, F111 pc's inflate more smoothly with a better launch of the d-bag. * F111 pc's are less susceptable to premature deployment from slipping out of a BOC. This varies depending on the size and construction of the container and its BOC. * F111 pc's are more forgiving to slight imperfections in construction regarding symetry. As pilot chutes are hand sewn, and there are numerious after market manufacturers, there is a greater possibility for imperfections in cutting, sewing, etc. These imperfections, have the potential to effect the deployment of the bag and are enhanced when ZP fabric is used. * With the advances in F111 fabric, F111 pc's are leaving the factory as a less porus material than they were 15 years ago, and therefore have a longer useful life span than those F111 pilot chutes from the "golden ages." * Given the decreased porosity of the fabric, it is more likely that the mesh and/or bridle/kill-line will wear out before the F111 fabric will. Sizing is a whole other discussion. We are not stating that ZP pilot chutes are ineffective or 'bad' equipment, just some of what appears to be common misconceptions regarding F111 pilot chutes. Safe Swoops, Mary & Al (and to set peoples mind at ease, we filled out our profile). Life causes death....Everybody Panic!!
