starkmtn

Hi all, I'm looking to get a new Odyssey and was wondering if anyone has gotten one with the new SPYN system who can comment on how it feels under canopy vs. the regular padding? (I mostly do CRW so am way more concerned with the way it feels under canopy than in freefall - I have a different rig for freefall.) Thanks!

Is there an agenda available yet? "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

Gary, I was reasonably certain that the main question I wanted to ask (namely, what, if any, action USPA is taking regarding the incident with Rich Winstock) was not going to get answered in the GMM but was going to be the topic of Executive Session. I look forward to seeing a report out of how USPA decided to handle that, even if it's "The matter was discussed and no action was taken," in the name of accountability to its membership. "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

Pardon my french, but horse shit. I've been to far more meeting than you and it wouldn't cost time at all. Yeah, I'm calling BS on this too, as someone with experience on two different boards, one of which I'm still on. Now, we meet 9-10x a year, so we don't ever have as much on one agenda, but it's pretty damn easy (and I say this as one who served as secretary of my current Board for several years) to record who the ayes, nays, and abstentions are. Has it slowed things down by a few seconds each vote sometimes? Sure. But it's been worth it for the transparency, because we have vocal shareholders who demand it. Maybe if more of us demanded similar transparency from USPA, it would be done. And Para5, I don't doubt that you personally would be glad to share your views. But not everyone is. With as many directors as there are on USPA's board, it's a huge barrier to put up to ask each individual member to email every director to ask how they voted rather than to just publish the votes in the minutes. For example: I wrote to every single director about an issue that was on this March's agenda and was important to me. I got _six_ replies, only three of which actually indicated their own inclinations as far as voting would go. So even if a member is able to take the time to email all the directors, they aren't in any way guaranteed the information. Plus, that's a LOT of email to ask directors to answer. Why not just make it very easy for members to find out how the directors voted and what got said by whom in meetings (_including_ committee meetings, which is where the meat and potatoes are)? "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

Trust? The board should set policy and INSURE the staff enacts it. Chuck, I think we're agreeing to agree here. They _do_ need to trust their staff, or they run the risk of micromanaging, which is a poison to any organization. Of course, if they are given reason not to trust that the staff will enact policy, the staff needs to be changed. That said, I don't think that's the source of the problem with this current issue or many others that seem to be putting the interests of business ahead of those of the jumpers. "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

As one board member is now calling it, it's the USPIA. Assuming they meant it as an indictment, can you share that name, if only privately? I'm making a list of who will definitely get my vote next time around, and this person just went on it! "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

Thanks everyone for the help! :D "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

Craig, I'm in agreement with all you wrote except for one important point I'd like to make as a veteran of two different boards (one of which I still sit on) - the BoD should _not_ be in the business of running operations - that is the job of the staff. The Board should be _setting policy_ and trusting the staff they chose to enact it. Eli "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

So let's start writing to our RD's and the ND's and asking for streaming of July's meeting! "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

I'm glad someone has finally mentioned the fact that many magazines have been offering a (cheaper) digital option for years. Any analysis of the cost of lifetime membership that doesn't take into account this trend in publishing is, IMHO, flawed. If a lifetime membership could be had for the old price and a digital subscription to Parachutist, that would eliminated a big chunk of the cost of said membership. Did anyone bring this up at the BoD meeting? "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

Any old-schoolers know what this would be for? Someone signed my logbook "GE [number]" and we have a friendly bet that I can't find out what it means. :) "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

I'm looking to get in touch with anyone who organized or knew about the para-ski event at Mad River Glen ahead of time. Please send me a private message if you have any info about this event. THanks! "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

I'm going to reiterate much of what Nightingale said. A stalker is looking for engagement, and yes, blocking IP's and changing your email address count as engagement. They send the message "I notice you, and I am changing my behaviour on account of yours." I _highly_ recommend a book called _The Gift of Fear_ by Gavin De Becker. Here's a link: http://books.barnesandnoble.com/search/results.aspx?WRD=the+gift+of+fear Good luck! "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

One option is to be a volunteer while also holding another paying job for more money. The organization I ride with is a private one, and they paid for my EMT-B class and EMT-I class. The only catch is that you owe them a year after each class, which is a requirement easily enough met. I have to ride a minimum of 24 hours a month - I do two 12-hour shifts on alternate Thursday nights (so I only have to limp through one workday if I'm up all night). The EMT-B class is quite easy and should pose no problem if you got a H.S. diploma. It is alternately one of the most mundane and most rewarding things I do. You'll go to calls to lift old men and Fatty McFattys back into their chairs, but you'll also get to see babies enter the world and crack open cars to get people out. PM if you want more info. "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan

Chris Gay is not yet on DZ.com so I am posting this on his behalf. Please post feedback (I'll collect and forward). Thanks! ***begin forwarded message* Hello all, During the past few years there has been tremendous growth in the 2-way event on an international level; however, at the US Nationals we are seeing a decline in all CF events including the 2-way. This is a problem that, if not corrected, will very likely lead to the end of CF in the future, and certainly no chance for anything larger than a 100-person formation. I would like to get some feedback on a possible new division (working title: “Pro-Am”) that I am going to lobby USPA to create. If we have enough response from all you experienced dogs, then this new division may be a part of this or next years US Nationals. USPA has been reluctant to create a new division until our numbers justify doing so. However, I believe our numbers will not grow until/unless we have this extra division. There would still be an Open class. The goal of the Pro-Am division would be to have Open class jumpers bring newer jumpers to the U.S. Nationals to compete in 2-way CF. Here are my ideas for the "Pro-Am" division, and I am certainly open to any suggestions or changes to make it better for all of us: CF 2-Way Pro-Am Team Composition: Maximum 4 jumpers - Minimum 3 jumpers. (2 jumpers turning points, 1 video person, 1 alternate) Eligibility: During each jump, at least 1 of the jumpers turning points must be an amateur (as defined below). The video person and the alternate may be either from the Open class or may be amateurs. Definition of amateur: (this is the tricky part) An “amateur” shall be defined as a jumper who has never medaled at the U.S. Nationals in CF or has not been on a CF World Record. As you review this proposal, please keep in mind that we are trying to do this to INCREASE our numbers of new jumpers. Now I have two questions for the group: 1) Do you like this idea for a new division, or do you have any other ideas for another division that would bring more CF jumpers to competition? 2) If this division were created, how many Open or non-amateur CF people from this group would bring an amateur with them to compete this year? Best Regards, Chris J. Gay "You guys should just do CRW. There are so many more ways to get killed, it makes a CYPRES seem safe." -Kevin Keenan