skypilotA1

Members
  • Content

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

Gear

  • Main Canopy Size
    Array
  • Main Canopy Other
    Array
  • Reserve Canopy Size
    Array
  • Reserve Canopy Other
    Array
  • AAD
    Array

Jump Profile

  • Home DZ
    Array
  • License
    Array
  • License Number
    Array
  • Licensing Organization
    Array
  • Number of Jumps
    Array
  • Years in Sport
    Array
  • First Choice Discipline
    Array
  • First Choice Discipline Jump Total
    Array
  • Second Choice Discipline
    Array
  • Second Choice Discipline Jump Total
    Array

Ratings and Rigging

  • IAD
    Array
  • AFF
    Array
  • USPA Coach
    Array
  • Pro Rating
    Array

Recent Profile Visitors

415 profile views
  1. I submit several license and rating applications a month for people in my region. I am finding new licenses are issued within a week to 10 days from arrival at USPA. That is with normal submissions. If you want and pay for expedited service, usually within 24 hours, that service is available. I am sure it varies a little based on the seasons, but I have never had a license submission take more than 10 days even during their busiest time. With the new on-line license and rating program, that time lag should decrease. Paul Gholson USPA Southern Regional Director
  2. Correct, same canopy, with the new extreme line set
  3. I have a Zulu 132 and a Zulu 152. I recently had the linesets replaced on both with the new Zulu Extreme linsets. I would have to call it a Zulu "moderately more interesting" than Extreme. Opening improved significantly, front riser pressure slightly less, not much more difference I can detect. Maybe the smaller canopies have a greater difference. It's better, but not a significant difference. Your opinions may vary.
  4. 6 Members to Run for USPA Central Regional Director in Special Election Skydiving News | Thursday, October 3, 2019 As of October 3, 2019, six USPA members will appear on the ballot in the upcoming special election to fill the remainder of the Central Regional Director’s term on the USPA Board of Directors. The election begins November 1, when Central region members with valid email addresses on file with USPA will receive an email to access the electronic ballot. The ballot will also be accessible by logging in to a USPA membership account at uspa.org and going to uspa.org/Election to vote. A paper ballot will also be mailed to all Central region members. The election concludes at 5 p.m. EST on December 2. Candidates (listed in alphabetical order): Lutz Andersohn Charles Crinklaw Bill Drake Jeremy Dubansky Wes McCauley David Munoz
  5. There is an in-depth description and explanation in Parachutist magazine. This was done, in part, to insure conformity to FAI rules. It is in Parachutist, it is on Facebook, it was discussed at length during the USPA Board meeting. S/L and IAD jumps count as freefall jumps toward a USPA license.
  6. Some people seem to making a big thing of this. It is NOT a new rule, it is simply explaining and defining the existing rule. A S/L or IAD has a freefall component, even if only a very short one. To take the example to an extreme, if the S/L jump used a mile long static line, there could be one minute of freefall. In another version, an instructor deployment at the bottom end of an AFF Cat A is simply an IAD jump. It isn’t a new rule, just defining the old rule specifically. One can read all about it in Parachutist. Paul Gholson S/L-I, IAD-I, AFF-I
  7. Generally it is the S&TA or DZO that will file an incident report involving serious injury or death. Under the new rule concerning AAD fires, the involved instructor or video person is required to submit the report.
  8. Your statement is incorrect. When USPA receives an incident report, the Director of Safety & Training strips the report of any identifying info (name, DZ, locale) and THEN the report is published. The original report is destroyed/shredded. That is how it is kept "Confidential". The USPA Board and Director of Safety & Training all agreed the BSR is required, incidents are not being reported. By your own previous statements, there are on average 675 AAD cutter heads supplied by CYPRES every year, and that does not count VIGIL or other AADs. Even accounting for military use and repairs (corroded/loose wires/etc), that is a HUGE number of AAD fires per year. We all just want to know the data, it may save lives. That is your answer. Paul Gholson, USPA Southern Regional Director
  9. I have owned Pilots of various sizes for the last 7 years, never a hard opening. We also have several Pilots in our student rigs, we live them, never an issue.
  10. "The question no one seems to want to answer - Why is collecting this data so important that it requires a BSR to get it? Aren't BSR's supposed to be about basic safety issues - things that can/have hurt or kill skydivers?" The answer is important because USPA doesn't know the extent of the problem. According to one source, CYPRES supplies on average 670 replacement cutters a year to the US, combined military & civilian. Even if the civilian percentage is a faction of that number, that is a HUGE number of AAD fires per year...and that is just CYPRES. And that number doesn't even include VIGIL fires. The AAD fires are simply not being reported. If the collected data indicates a pattern (like TIs with hand cams, AFF single instructor release jumps, or solo student practicing backflips), then some retraining may be in order. The extent of the problem simply isn't known, and this BSR may help save lives. So simply...the BSR is simply to collect data that may save lives, and there is no downside to reporting. Paul Gholson
  11. In reply to mxk, I was told "almost" all US-based Vigils are repaired and serviced in Florida. Very few were sent over to Belgium.
  12. I have been in contact with VIGIL. Apparently, this is their busiest time. They are aware of delays in unit turnaround. They are estimating 3-4 weeks turnaround times. One should get an email as soon as the unit is received. If no initial email is received, or no contact is made in 3-4 weeks, they suggest contacting them directly, during business hours. They promised to personally contact the owner if a problem developed. They responded to me personally within 24 hours. They seemed genuinely willing to help. Their contact info is: Vigil America Deland FL www.Vigil.aero 386-736-8464 Paul Gholson
  13. You will have no trouble. I have made recurrency jumps with people out of the sport 40 years, and no issues. Just get a complete briefing from an S&TA or head instructor, and perform EPs several times. Follow the BSRs, don't do anything out of your comfort zone, remember to breath, it all comes back to you. Good luck!
  14. To reply to (MakeItHappen) Jan's concerns, in order: 1. The initial motion from S&T Committee was not acceptable to the Full Board, the motion was rewritten, discussed, debated, voted on and passed. It was all in public, in full session. You and I, along with 20 other Board members were there. The version of the BSR passed was the version the Full USPA Board wanted, it included ANY AAD fire on a student jump. 2. Any BSR violation is subject to disciplinary action. Yes, if an AAD fire is not reported according to the BSR, there is possibility of disciplinary action, as with any BSR violation. It has been that way for decades. This is no different. Nothing has changed. 3. The incident report (if one cares to look under USPA.org/downloads) can indeed remain anonymous. The section at the end, where the person submitting the report, is to write their name, even says "optional for non-fatal reports". The language of the BSR also strictly states "no disciplinary action" if the report is submitted within 48 hours. No means no. 4. Your statement is not correct. There is always a possibility of an instructor being required some additional re-training, even if no incident. That is not in any way a disciplinary action. Many times I have required a Coach or Instructor to retrain if there was an issue. I have even required it of myself when I thought there may be a potential issue. The retraining might be as simply as "get some advice from 'Instructor A' on how they handled that particular issue, they have encountered it before". You could also call it learning. There was never a report submitted, and certainly no 1-6 action taken. 99% of all issues are handled at the local DZ level by the local S&TA/head instructor/DZO, and handled well. That is the way they should be handled. 5. Every Coach or Instructor takes a chance on being sued by any student at any time. That is the chance we take living in a free litigious society. This BSR makes no change, and has no bearing on the ability of someone to sue, or not to sue. My personal advice, if a Coach or Instructor wants to completely remove themselves from the possibility of a lawsuit, they probably shouldn't be a Coach or Instructor. The USPA Instructor Rating Manual covers this area very well, it is required material in any Coach or Instructor Course. Please remember everyone, USPA simply needs the data. The data might help us determine dangerous trends, develop new practices, and save lives. Paul Gholson AFF-I, USPA Regional Director
  15. The reason for the creation and passing of this BSR is simply to collect data from the field. Safety and training committee believes there may be lots of AAD fires occurring in the field unreported, or there may be few. The data collected is only used to measure trends or patterns, and ultimately make the sport safer. The collected data from a self-report may not be used for disciplinary action. One of the primary goals of USPA is to promote safety of the membership. The hope is this data may save lives, thus the creation of this self-report. Paul Gholson