bdazel

So... are you declaring yourself an enemy?

And the fifth.

Where is the index file? I have only the avchd files from the stream folder. I think the rest of the info is gone, because I subsequently formatted the card.

And there's the fourth. Your blind assumptions reveal your naivety. Try again...

Oh, how sad. Now there's a third. The third being measuring your self-worth by what you can put on your resume.

So your school and/or parents failed you in at least two areas. That is unfortunate. But hey, thanks for making me smile.

Did you learn that nonsensical mantra in third grade when you should have been learning grammar?

I discovered this weekend that the cx100 is much less rain-friendly than my old miniDV cameras. I lost a video due to what looks to be corrupted files that I can only attribute to the moisture. The corrupted files play with obvious glitches in VLC, crash Windows media player, and crash both Vegas and Premiere.

Not dead yet, but dying of a slow, painful, cancer-like disease called liberalism. (this one's going to get me in trouble. )

The problem there is that you guys employ forgetful, lazy people. The correct solution is to fire them and replace them with people who aren't forgetful and lazy. Agreed. If I had that power, I would make that happen.

Ok... then I don't have to either. I'm not the one stating there is not a correlation. The onus of proof is placed on the individual making the statement. You stated there is a correlation thus the onus of proof is on you. Instead of getting bored you should just go back to being bliss (and ignorant) ... If I were in a courtroom, that MIGHT be the case. It would be dependent on many different variables. BUT, this is a simple online forum. Is there a rule book somewhere that I don't know about? If so, then you are correct, I am ignorant of your stated rule. As for bliss, well I am getting a kick out of how adamant you are to shoot down my comments - but not quite near bliss yet.

For what it's worth, when shooting in TV mode, I used to get the decent results with evaluative metering, then over-exposing by 1/3 to 2/3 stops.

I don't have to, I'm not the one stating there is a correlation. Ok... then I don't have to either. I'm not the one stating there is not a correlation. How long do you want to keep this up? I'm getting bored real fast.

And when someone is under the influence of marijuana at work they get fired. What is your point? lol. What's your point? Did I suggest anyone was under the influence of marijuana at work? Yes, you did suggest it ... ... it appears that you don't have to be under the influence of marijuana to be forgetful. Ah ha. There's where you screwed up. Effects of mj linger after the 'buzz' is gone.

No disagreement here.

And when someone is under the influence of marijuana at work they get fired. What is your point? lol. What's your point? Did I suggest anyone was under the influence of marijuana at work? Ha, ha. Stop massaging semantics. In Post 81, you clearly implied that the reason you had to clean-up other fuck-ups' fucked-ups is that their fuck-ups are the result of being addled from being fucked-up. ("At work"? Yeah, ok, we're idiots.) Wrong again. I clearly did no such thing. Re-read post 81. I think you are seeing what you want to see, rather than what is on the screen in front of your face.

Uh... not really. I said nothing about what is OK (whatever that means ). I said what affects me personally. Having to fix other people's screw-ups pisses me off and wastes my personal time. When the person is not there to screw anything up, then I don't have to fix it.

Fixed it for you. Funny, but wrong. You assume there is no correlation. Thanks for the smile though. Have you performed multiple scientific studies that prove there is a correlation? I doubt it ... stop blaming the drugs and start blaming the individuals. Have you performed multiple scientific studies that prove there is not a correlation? I doubt it ... Sometimes a little simple observation and common sense go long way.

And when someone is under the influence of marijuana at work they get fired. What is your point? lol. What's your point? Did I suggest anyone was under the influence of marijuana at work?

Nope. Not making that argument. In my experience when someone is drunk at work they get fired. When someone is hungover, they don't work, and then there is no problem to fix.

Fixed it for you. Funny, but wrong. You assume there is no correlation. Thanks for the smile though.

An example of how smoking mj personally affects me: For work, I often must spend extra time fixing messes created by people who were too forgetful or lazy or just plain scatterbrained to do the job right.

That sounds so nice. But I disagree. What you describe has merit as a long term solution (meaning many generations). But for now and into the near future the hatred (especially amongst terrorists) goes far too deep. And I stand by my statement that our popularity should not be used as a benchmark for our national security. I'm not arguing whether it IS or IS NOT, I'm arguing that is SHOULD NOT BE.

Those are the two most common definitions of communism. Please pick which of those you think the President fits and then please give examples of why. For example, show how the President has taken all property and made it communally-owned by the state. Or, describe how the President is the head of a totalitarian state that controls all economic and social activity. See also: Socialism Again with the black and white. Where did you pull those definitions, Webster? Have you read Karl Marx? If you can't make the connections on your own, then I fear we may simply have fundamentally polarized views of reality.

I see what you are saying. The entirety of my point was that our popularity level with the rest of the world should by no means be a major focus of this administration. It could however, be a secondary consideration, if in fact it may help increase our national security. But I think it is a serious mistake to use popularity as a benchmark for national security. Other nations will do whatever advances their own interests. It is not a question of whether they like us or not.