Chaucer

And yet, you haven't provided a thing pointing toward that supposition except casting vague aspirations at various government agencies. Provide some real, compelling evidence for it and I - and presumably everyone else - will listen. Until then, you remain alone in the Vortex in this belief. And now back to our regularly scheduled programming...

Correct. No argument there. Correct. No argument there. I have done the same and received a similar response. No argument there. The government in general, and the FBI specifically, is commonly known to be hesitant when it comes to releasing public records. This isn't anything new or particularly illuminating. It's just how government, unfortunately, works. Mark Zaid had to literally sue the FBI for them to release the Cooper files. They are under no obligation to do so. Regarding the redacted transcript document, why would they refer to something that doesn't exist? There are no redacted Seattle ATC transcripts, so why would they even mention them? You keep saying this without evidence. The two transcripts were prepared by different people at different locations. Those differences are not evidence of anything nefarious. Those navigators worked aboard C-130s and C-141 which were transport planes used to drop men and material. Both navigators were also tasked with becoming drop experts so that when something went out the back it ended up where it was supposed to. Those two men were far more qualified to calculate a DZ than any civilian skydiver. Soderlind and Major Thomas Spangler looked at and used the exact same data and arrived at the exact same conclusion and identical DZs. So, where exactly is the evidence that the Seattle ATC transcripts were redacted? Or are you going to obfuscate again by listing your qualifications? Or refer me to the FAA handbook again? Or tell me to go back and look at your previous posts? Robert, you've been humping this dog for 15 years and still haven't made any puppies. Might be time to accept that you're a different species. (Metaphorically speaking, of course.)

* Please see post #63451

Again, none of this is evidence that the Seattle ATC transcripts have been redacted, altered or otherwise different from the originals. Moreover, you seem to be implying some kind of cover up by the FBIor FAA, but have provided even less evidence in that regard. As I have said, again and again, if you have evidence for a massive cover up in the NORJAK case that includes these mysterious redactions, please provide some evidence.

Resumes don't solve cases. People do. It is not the responsibility of the FBI to prove to you that they are complete. It is your responsibility to demonstrate that they are not. You have so far failed to do so.

As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, there is no evidence of redactions in the Seattle ATC radio transcripts.

This has been pointed out by you and only you. In 15 years, you have presented no evidence that the Seattle ATC transcripts are incorrect, inaccurate, or incomplete.

Those transcripts were released many years ago: https://norjak.org/files/

HEY FBI GIVE US THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OF COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN FLIGHT 305 AND NWA GROUND PERSONNEL SINCERELY, THE VORTEX

The FBI was so honed in to the skydiving community and the community itself then was so tight knit, that I doubt "one of their own" would be able to pull it off and either A. not be found out or B. not eventually spilling the beans.

B. A requires me to be under threat of death. C requires others to be under threat of death.

"Good bye to people I've trusted I've got to go out and make my own way I might get rich, you know, I might get busted..."

Sounds like you didn't enjoy the episode. Sorry about that. Cheers!

So, Cooper didn't sing the blues?