meat.missile

Delete me

JFC, another fallacy! How is it possible that after I call baronn out for all his fallacious comments, you would come in here and expect to get away with the same. It's pathetic, do better.

Going on an on can work when the persons argument isn't riddled with fallacies and false premises. When that was pointed out to them, they doubled down with more fallacious comments instead of correcting the original comments.

Billvon, aren't you a mod? No one is so stupid they don't know fallacy's make what they say invalid. Baronn is a troll. What is your PayPal, I am serious about giving you 5 bucks. There is one condition though, if you do bitch about this again the mods get to suspend you for ehhh a month. oh and if you dox me you get banned, I believe that's a normal rule.

2 more fallacies! YAY!

I find the Perris bunkhouse to be disgusting. Last time I was in there was 2 springs ago (2017) ago so maybe things changed. It has terrible ventilation, it’s dingy, it smells, it is hot, the kitchen area is tiny. They seem to always stuff everyone in one room instead of spreading them out between all the rooms. They are small, not much room to store gear. I would stay in an air BB or go to eloy.

True, however, someone needs to point out his crappy arguments so people less well versed in the subject understand.

Oh and let's add a little context to what baronn is complaining about. This is stolen from another thread. ~$0.75 per year, I take poops that cost people more than that. Actually, Baronn, I will give you $5 if you don't bring this up again till 2025.... so I don't have to read your crappy comments on the topic.

oh another fallacy, you are on a roll! I am only here to dismantle your crappy comments. I missed this fallacy first time around! Barron, try harder. You are now up to three different fallacies.

I know this will be wasted on you, but here goes. This is logical fallacy. This is the same logical fallacy. This is two things. First it's the same logical fallacy as before. Second it is not the responsibility of the USPA Board members to oversee a project that is ran by a different organization. This is false, they agreed to use member funds to help the project. If they agreed the use member funds to get the project to completion, member funds would be funding the rest of the project. Which it isn't, so you're wrong. Just because you don't know something doesn't mean no one knows it. This is false on two fronts. If you are talking about the USPA Board the voters provide oversight in the form of elections, reading/attending board meetings and contacting their representative member. If you are talking about the ISMHF, it is ran by a board of trustees. The reason there is a board is so they can have oversight on each other and generally there is someone that can replace trustees. Now just because I don't know if there is someone that can replace a trustee, doesn't mean that person doesn't exist. Last, if you are saying the USPA should have oversight on the ISMHF, well yeah, you are wrong there too. That isn't how that works. Could the USPA call them out on things? Sure, but that isn't real oversight. For there to oversight there must be authority. Again, just because you don't know something doesn't mean no one knows it. While probably sarcastic, it just shows how, uhhhhhhhh, your.... inability to use google, or general knowledge of history. This needs to be broken down. first, if you want to know how much has been given, why not look it up? It is public information, and has been posted here the last time you brought this up. Second, again, it is not the USPA Boards responsibility to manage the funds of a completely separate organization, the entire premise of that is ridiculous. Third, the where and what is simple, it is being used by the ISMHF non profit to build a skydiving museum. Last, if you came in here, made some logical argument, didn't say ignorant things, people might be on your side, but you don't.

There is so much crap logic and bad information coming from you (baronn) I don't even know where to start. oh it's you. Mods; I thought you guys wanted to stop trolling on here?

For my purposes it is there so the pilot doesn't get in trouble.

Oh no, I really don't care. Their post was just bad logic.

They are pretty cool.

Neither are, cranes, dams, chimneys, amusement park rides, electrical towers, Statues, trees, or wind turbines.

Which one do I talk to about getting a tiny round chest mount?

Any of you folks know what the smallest TSO'd chest mount reserve is?

Yep, it is the only TSO'd BASE rig that can take a chest mount reserve.* *to my knowledge. I thought Bilvon knew of another one.

It is also impact rated.

It's not a game. You can't just say that and provide no details. P.S. as this was in Europe, It was relativity safe and legal, but I assume you are talking about in the US. Edit: For anyone else reading apparently the BASEr is being manufactured again.

Just so everyone is aware. This can happen with half a step through. As you can see the right riser is also twisted.

What option?

BASEr are hard to come by. I cant think of any others.

Doesn't have anything to do with your first point, but whatever ends this interaction is good enough.

So vague.