Royreader8812

LOL, Assad is supported by his people. That is clear. It is also the number one reason he is winning. war hawks are fuming. You are just spitting out the stuff the news told you to say, because that is all you have. The most bewildering thing about your rhetoric, is you fail to see the failures of those pointing the finger. Remember, 15 years of war and turmoil in the middle east, $trillions and no successes. None. Just hundreds of thousands dead, millions displaced and now you have ISIS, refugee crisis, ruined countries. And Assad is the evil guy. well done idiots. Fuck off.

Why don't you tell us who has it then. I have stated that you, me, the international intelligence community and anyone for that matter, could never know for sure who definitely does not have it. Who used it, now that is a different story. The first question is always, who benefits. The least likely person to fall into that category is Assad.

LOL, so you want me to answer a question that not even the US intelligence services knows, and if I can't answer it. You will somehow twist that into a statement means Assad did it. You obviously do not understand the situation in Syria very well, so I am not quite sure how you can continue to ask me questions that I could not possibly know the answer to, leading up to some fucked up conclusion. They all might have it, for all I know. That is not the question here, the question is was it used, and who used it. Assad is winning the war, the rebels are on the run. Peace talks are about to happen and Assad has the support of a majority of Syrians as he is the only hope of retaining a secular nation there. But the idiots that think he is 'the bad guy', want a group of fundamental Wahhabi extremists to take over because Assad is such a bad guy. Tell me again how it would benefit Assad toi kill 70 civilians with chemical weapons...? The media is now showing footage of a little girl pleading for the war to stop, to justify going to war there. What kind of asshole falls for that shit? You are quite clearly a troll so unless you make some sort of sense or show that you have at least a reasonable understanding of the situation. you are not worth one more iota of energy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGq6aLTOF_I I suggest you all watch this if you wish to continue supporting this madness. This is a UN Peace council briefing after a visit to Syria last year.

You realise there are a number of groups in Syria fighting against Assad. If you think it is just the Syrian government (and Russia) vs ISIS... Then who the hell have the coalition been openly arming and training for the last few years. Do you read or watch the state department briefings? The Moderate rebels that hold the area where the gas was 'released' are allies of the coalition and your money is going to arm them. This is no secret. You might want to clue yourself up on the situation a little better before having such a stance on it. It is nice to see that there are members of congress th\t are stating exactly as I am. Because they are the ones that Trump would have to go through if he is drawn into this and the very same people that stopped Obama from doing so in 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXIJlyxCQyE&feature=youtu.be The anchor looks flabbergasted that he would say and think such things. He speaks absolute sense.

Well, what I would like is a thorough independent investigation to determine that. But with the dogma already set in stone and the policy to back up the knee jerk likely already in place, while the gas is still lingering in the air. It is probably safe to say the tax revenue of many of those in this disussion would be involved. It is akin to the WMD's dogma, but to bring Trump in on the game... I don't think it is going to work,but I am probably being g too hopeful there. But there are a lot of idiots out there. On one hand blaming wahabbist muslims for everything, and on the other not thinking they could have anything to do with this. And want to go in and arm them so they can tople the only secular government in the region. My personal beliefs is that wahabbism has more to do with money and united states foreign policy, than any of you in here would be willing to believe. The 'moderate rebels'are Al Qaeda > Al Nusra > Isis. These entities exist only to serve the foreign policy of the nation's that 'pretend' they are trying to stop them. Russia and Syria have proven that they are not as strong as what the western coalition have made them out to be. That is because they have been feeding them arms and backing them up the entire time. Only a fool would not see this.

Oh it came from the air.... Must have been Russia. There are not several nations illegally bombing in Syria at all, nor was the last chemical attack contained in a ground to ground missile... Great powers of deduction Batman.

Rubbish! They are already winning. And making your team look like amateurs. Only an idiot would believe it would be strategic to kill less than 100 people with chemical weapons, only to face the predictable backlash which in the form of the already widespread 'assumption' that they did it. But there are obviously plenty of idiots out there. Because people don't learn from history. But if course having wahabbist terrorists running the only secular nation in the region is a great idea. They don't have the ability to kill indesciminantly at all... Ffs. What a bunch of morons.

The many that haven't been there, have a vested interest in saying otherwise and run around with the rebels. There us absolutely no reasonable explanation that would suggest Assad and Russia would gain out of such actions. And a significant number of reasons that would benefit the rebels and the plethora of countries that are supporting them. The old Occam's razor.

and which one of those link is conclusive evidence that Assad was responsible? The accusations coming from the people funding and supplying the Rebels? That one UN spokesperson suggesting the evidence is pointing at the rebels, was part of the investigation team.

The replacement jobs don't even exist yet. The problem with societies around the world these days, is the false assumption that growth is needed for progress. In our world, an equilibrium in the economy is the line between recession and depression. There is more than enough resources for everyone, we just need to stop being wankers about it. It simply means our current societies will have to change somehow or another. More likely than not, unfortunately, it probably means violence and death on a large scale. The 1% that have 90% of the world's resources in their hands, will not be willing to give up the gravy train for the benefit of all. And for a peaceful resolution this is what needs to happen.

Good old Wikipedia eh, Did you edit it yourself before posting? Lol. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/6/syrian-rebels-used-sarin-nerve-gas-not-assads-regi/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10039672/UN-accuses-Syrian-rebels-of-chemical-weapons-use.html

So last time Assad was accused of 'using Chemical weapons on his own people' [sic], and the media onslaught backing up those accusations, were used as reason to feed the very people the war on terror was supposed to be killing with more weapons... The resulting investigation found without doubt that the chemical weapons were in fact used by the rebels themselves... The white helmets are also a good indication that the rebels are complicit, the white helmets only operate in rebel controlled territory. They are referred to a civil defense, but in fact there is a real Syrian civil defense that is od in rebel controlled areas. The white helmets and the rebels are part and parcel. The rebels are doing it tough at the moment, O'bomber is out, Trump is still in transition and Russia and Syria have them on the run. How would anyone be so stupid to believe without investigation, that the rebels themselves would not simply do the same thing they did last time. Or that Assad and Russia would use chemical weapons to have such a small impact on their offensive, only to receive condemnation from the world around. The most disturbing aspect of this, and this does not take away from the terrible tragedy of those personally effected, is the media in the west are very quick to point at Russia and Assad with no facts to base their stories on and with the history i have explained above. You would think they would have learned from the past, if they were at all interested in the truth. When the last investigation finished and it was found without a doubt that the rebels had used the chemical weapons, do you think the media retracted their accusations... did they then report in the truth that was found... Of course they didn't. We live is a cruel world full of stupid idiots and fucking assholes. Don't be one of them.

Fo shizzle Just don't use hearsay as evidence and if the investigation leads to another crime, then use the full extent of the law to ensure those responsible for crimes are bought to justice. Tunnel vision is not helpful in such an investigation. In politics those pointing the finger are often complicit.

Once again, any accusation is 'evidence'. Plenty of those getting thrown around. How about facts... Got any? Russia didn't need to hack anything or collude with anyone. The Dems screwed themselves with their own ego, the same applies to the media. Nobody believes any of them any more. People pretend to, like you. But you all know deep down that it is all bullshit. If there was factual evidence of Russian collusion. All things considered we would know by now.

LOL, I believe you will find that Americans are fat and relatively unhealthy , and Russians are generally in shape and healthy because of the quality of food. But we are digressing here. Right now the whole Russia thing seems to be taking a side step because the Obama administration was caught using intelligence services to surveil their political opponents.. Watergate was a break in, this is using the intelligence services. Should be the headline of the year.... But but... the Russians...

Surely you do not discredit the good old USA out of the #1 status? Or does corruption not exist in the USA? When corruption is in the realms of trillions, that makes Russia's Billions look like chump change, no? I am not suggesting Russia is not corrupt, you can still pay off cops and and essentially get away with murder there, if youu are in the know. But in the USA it is at a much higher level and dealing with much larger figures. China is definitely up there as well. They are learning the hard way about industrialization. This is why they need Russia so badly. Both countries are relatively new to the process of capitalism. So they actually have an excuse.

Ukraine is under the Rule of a regime that was put there with the assistance of the Obama administration. [sarcasm]Janet Nuland's cookies were the magic weapon in the violent coup [/sarcasm]. It is plainly obvious that Crimea was a objective for NATO and Russia outsmarted the process without having to use one single bullet. Your leaders are still furious to this day. Europe is dependent on Russia for survival at present, less and less so but that is the truth. Eastern Europe would freeze to death in winter without their gas. Russia was weakened by sanctions from the west. Russia which is not my country by the way, are diversifying their economy and in turn looking internally to supply their needs rather than depending on oil and gas exports. This process takes time. But so does Eastern Europe's ability to heat themselves in winter. For every European that is no longer using Russian oil and gas however, there are 10 Chinese being born. Time will tell what happens there, but China and Russia are in a good partnership with each other. One has lots of money and lots of people, the other has lots of space and lots of resources... these things complement each other well and their cooperation will lead to a strong bond that your leaders are quite worried about. The dogma that Russia has whittled away to nothing and is not a force to be reckoned with anymore, was destroyed by their superior results against ISIS. But in reality you are right, they are not as strong as the other countries supposedly fighting ISIS. The other countries are actually feeding ISIS and assisting them in their open plan to topple Assad. But because they lied about it, Russia made them look weak... this was very smart. Like this new chemical weapon bullshit you 'are about to be' getting all riled up about. Just another bullshit story to make the people defending themselves look like the bad guys. It always seems so convenient (for the likes of you) that Assad and/or Russia would use chemical weapons against their own people or indiscriminately start bombing schools and hospitals, when the support for western intervention is at a low. Nothing like a few burning kids to get the population behind them again, eh. Ukraine and Syria are both wars that are purely the result of geopolitical objectives of those that are using the United States and her allies as pawns. These people don't care about you, they don't care about your country and they will kill you if it means they will achieve their goals. Fortunately for you and me, they needs us alive to buy houses and stuff our faces with their (clients') products, so they can continue rule quietly. Be careful who you support. I don't necessarily support Russia or any country in this mess. But I surely can see the forest through all those trees. You just need to look further than the headlines. All the information is hidden in the text.

Nah,not at all. Goin into a war with no intention of winning and bleeding your country into unprecedented debt is ruthless. War sux, but if you are forced to go there, going in there and getting the job done and then going home is just better. Like I said, the real difference is that Russia set out to do what they say they are doing. No bullshit. The 'coalition' are only just trying to destabilise the region and could care less about the people that live there. Even though they use them as a reason to go in the first place. There is nothing more ruthless than that. What war has the US entered this century, that they are not still in or have a gimmer of hope of winning? Lack of capability has nothing to do with this.

Look, Russia is the only country apart from Syria that legally have aircraft in the region. There are several countries doing illegal airstrikes... Spin it how you want, Just ask Syria, it is their country. I don't think Russia is all innocent and is clear of corruption, I don't think any country is. However, right up until Aleppo was in its final days of being liberated, There were reports coming out of western media saying The Russians are killing civilians, a bloodbath it was described as. The white helmets are trying to save thee Syrian people... Fast forward to the day the rebels retreated from there, the only people giving aid to the civilians were Russian and Syrian troops... Guess where the white helmets were...? Not to be seen. what was mentioned in the media after that? NOTHING! People call RT a Russian Propaganda mouthpiece, but do you by the same rationale call the BBC an English propaganda mouth piece? How about the national news networks of other socialized countries? It was just made clear that the only network that is in the limelight these days, that does not do 'pre-interviews', is in fact RT. All of the major networks in western countries will assess what guests have to say, before letting them on. If their view is not withing the scope of the networks angle, then they are not allowed on, that is pure propaganda. Further more, what you will find if you google ISIS and use the tools to pick a date before September 2015 (when the Russians entered and annihilated them), you will see fancy video productions by them, of beheading and burning people alive... this was 4 years after the 'coalition' of supposedly the world's most powerful military forces had already spent 4 years trying to knock them back. After September 2015, you show me one fancy video of someone being killed by ISIS, you show me one fancy video of their new delivery of 50 Toyota landcruizers... A delivery the CIA and other international organisations of that ilk were 'unable to detect'... Toyotas that have US made weapons strapped to the back of them... FFS, how gullible do you have to be. What you will find though, is surveillance videos from Russia showing the convoys of stolen oil heading over to turkey to be refined... you will find videos of ISIS being annihilated and you will find videos of state department briefings talking about how this western coalition are arming Al Qaeda and Al Nusra under the name of 'Moderate Rebels' to try to overthrow Assad. What was the war on terror about again, and who were the enemy? Now they are you ally in Syria, while the enemy next door in Iraq? how the fuck does that make sense? Just for one minute you imagine if a group of US rebels were shelling in the US, trying to work towards Washington being armed by Russia, Iran and Syria... what would happen. The military would kill them and in turn would be... you guessed it, "killing their own civilians". I don't know what kind of stupid one would have to be to not see through all this, if they spend at least a small amount of time researching it for themselves. Taking this all into consideration, how can one trust the media either. So no, I am not a Russian spy, nor I am not a Russian ball licker or Putin Lover, they do some awful stuff to be fair. All countries are corrupt. Try to get your head around that one. They are all looking out for themselves. Syria is strategic to Russia's existence. But when it comes to the middle east, the fuckwits you are trying to support are most definitely in the wrong, are poor at carrying out their objectives and have had no successes there in the past 1.5 decades. The Russians went in there less than two years ago and have devastated the opposition to the Assad government. Even when this opposition have the backing of how many countries? 10? More? They are simply better at war than the west. Because they are not 'pretending' to do anything, that is the distinct difference. So back to the hacking and the lies from your propaganda... About time some facts came to the table don't you think?

Here is a clue for you. Sometimes those who are engaged in online conversation, are people at home, on a desktop or laptop computer with a cup of tea and a nice big screen and a keyboard... at this time they have time and a nice view of everything they write... at other times they are on a small mobile device, with fat thumbs, an aggressive auto correct,a cracked screen, no time and a on screen keyboard that takes up 1/3 of the viewing area and on an old website that is not as mobile friendly as others... Some people are better at reading between the lines themselves and don't tend to use ad hominem, they also might care less about perfect punctuation and are more interested in discussing the truth. while others when stuck for an explanation will used ad hominem to continue to argue against the person changing the subject at hand from the post they were discussing, to the mannerisms and past history of those they are trying to refute. The short answer is I have fat thumbs and could care less what you think of my spelling and grammar, you get the point regardless. if not, then you are not worth debating.

Fact 1: leaking classified information as a federal employee is a felony. Fact 2: Gowdy asked Comey in this video if this was the case. Fact 3: Comey agreed Your sarcastic "Got It", is weak at best. Are you guys really this weak? surely you have something substantial to have such an opinion... or are the tin foil hats affecting the affecting your thought processes? When were people so gullible? Germany in the late 30's?

LOL, This question is more of an answer to me. You are not interested in truth. I never said Gowdy is an impeccable person, nor do I have a strong stance on his involvement in the Benghazi affair, I am not a religious man and he very much is. It is safe to say I don't agree with everything he says, nor do I have much of an understanding of his career. However, I do know he is a seasoned prosecutor and in a position to question these gentlemen that have posed the assertion that the Russians hacked the election, through reports coming from the institutions they head.. His questions relate not to the Russians, but the leaking of classified information that is coming out out of these institutions, and into the media that is being used to prop up the rhetoric of the 'Russian hacking scandal'. When he asks Comey a question about the legality of this information coming out and into the media being a felony, and Comey agrees that this is the case... How does his involvement in the Benghazi affair, have anything to do with it? The 'fact' that the media and you and all the people crying wolf, seem to care less that criminal activity is being used at the highest level to prop up this whole charade, is quite telling. You lot have no interest in the truth. Still there are no facts pertaining to the involvement of Russia? Even though the NSA FBI and CIA are involved and leaking out information to pin it on them... LOL. Weak would be an understatement. This to me, shows that integrity is not as common as bias in this discussion. Your question is more a statement of deceit, for the above reasons. 2 + 2 = 4, no matter who says it.

OK lets test your theory that I am some paid internet troll from Russia and not a Skydiver interested in politics that happens to have opposing thought processes to you. Because in case you didn't notice. Not everyone is falling for this bullshit. Ask me a technical or social question about skydiving that would not be openly available to everyone/google, but something I should know if I have been a skydiver for over a circa 15 years and have more than 10,000 jump. Though I have been skydiving for a decade less than you, I have more than 6 times the jumps you have. It is safe to say that you should be able to strike some sort of question that I should be able to answer as a skydiver to clear this up so you can refrain from talking about me and some whacked out conspiracy theories, so we can stick to the subject at hand. Something that will not be in a manual or found in a google search. Lets lay this thing to rest please. Though my account is anonymous, that is within the rules. Personal attacks are not, and you and others making false accusations to shelter your weak assertions, is actually a waste of everyone time... You just make yourself look like an idiot. I really don't care, but I want to call you out on your retarded, baseless bullshit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIh-CadZweI Looks like all this bullshit is moving away from whether Russia had anything to do with hacking the election, and onto the fact that the Security departments have broken the law 'BIGTIME' by pushing the propaganda out and it does not look good for the story most of you here seem to believe. Please correct me if I am wrong.